Pittwatch.com: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Gossip

46 opinions for A Jolie-Pitt Movie Outing

• angela
  Apr 15, 2008 at 6:12 pm

  i love angie’s clothes. :)

  i agree. shiloh would’ve probably be running around the theatre if they brought her around. and i’m sure she’s enjoying her nap. it’s great that there’s no paps on the scene.

• Pamela
  Apr 15, 2008 at 6:16 pm

  I couldn’t agree with you more. One of my favorite interviews I watched with Brad was where he was talking about this sportscaster who had 4 children, and he said “I have 4 kids, and 2 are adopted…I don’t remember which two”. Brad commented how much he liked that quote and I have to say that it melted my heart too. My husband and I have a biological son, and we are adopting a baby girl in 3 weeks. I think this is one of the reasons I admire Brad and Angelina so much because they GET IT!! We tell our little boy that he grew in Mommy’s tummy, and his sister is growing in our heart…but we’re all one family.

• Matilda
  Apr 15, 2008 at 8:55 pm

  Can I just say how absolutely fantastic it is there were no paparazzi hounding them as they left the cinema? It looks like they didn’t even notice the girl who took these shots. You’re right Sherry, Texas is definitely good for them. I hope they’re enjoying their time there. The kids are probably relishing the chance to be dropped off at school without a fuss, and it’s nice Angelina can have a little less stress in her life especially while she’s pregnant.

  It’s funny that the discussion thread you just posted yesterday is already becoming pertinent again, Sherry :) I agree it’s not nice for people to say that Brad and Angie favor the adopted children, when it’s clearly untrue and an unfair distinction to make. Especially because it just happens that the *youngest* child happens to be the biological one. Maybe once the new baby arrives there will be another shift in their family dynamic, and Shiloh will become just another kid in the pack as far as the media is concerned. It’s doubtful but I’m sure the new baby’s arrival will help.

• BlessBrangelina
  Apr 16, 2008 at 12:52 am

  I agree it’s great that there were no paps to record this outing. Maybe the magazines are finally not buying new pics at premium, so it’s not cost effective for the paps to hang around.

  I hope it continues and she is able to have a more peaceful pregnancy. Let’s also hope that we have finally turned the corner on the “Open Season” that was declared on this family.

• Deni
  Apr 16, 2008 at 6:15 am

  It’s funny that there is always an outcry as to why Shiloh isn’t seen and I find it ironic actually. From what I read, people complain that the kiddies are in the spotlight and being photographed all the time and NOW Shiloh is kept home or ‘out of the light’ and people still complain because they can’t see her. Good grief! I say leave them alone.

  I’m happy that they are happy and healthy and still together and they are a great family.

• Brangelina Groupie
  Apr 16, 2008 at 7:20 am

  Real Texans are a private, mind my on business kind of people. I am not surprised the Jolie-Pitts are getting some privacey.

• kim
  Apr 16, 2008 at 8:28 am

  If you watch the news, I think we can all agree that Texans are private mind my own business kind of people. But then again it seem so are Utah, Arazona and also in British Columbia, Canada.

• Bee
  Apr 16, 2008 at 9:22 am

  Nice shots and very good to see them again :) I think too that they are enyjoing their privacy, wish them all the best.

  About Shi, the concern of some people may comes from the fact that we have seen Zee much more even when she was arround Shi’s age. But people forget that it is a different situation now, four young kids are more difficult to handle….

• ligaya
  Apr 16, 2008 at 9:58 am

  Chiming in:

  –Pamela, that’s so beautifully sweet about “growing in our heart.”
  –Deni, when it comes to making money, the tabloid media and 8ters never worry about consistency when it comes hammering the Jolie-Pitts.
  –Matilda, I hope so too. Lainey kids about Shiloh being the Chosen One (or Great White Hope according to others) and the coming baby as the Second Coming. The media has made that kind of division between biological white children and adopted black/brown/yellow children. There’s still plenty of prejudice and discrimination out here, and the h8ters have taken up Shiloh as their cause.

  Anyway, love seeing the kids watching movies in theaters instead of their private screening room a la most celebrities, or buying out the whole theater so they don’t have to mix with ordinary people.

• Sophia
  Apr 16, 2008 at 4:11 pm

  I think Bee is right when she says that we have seen Zee much more even when she was arround Shi’s age. Also while I completely agree you can´t take a 2-year-old to the movies (how out-of-touch with reality can anyone be to think you could!), it is still amazing how someone as young as Zahara can go to the movies. She is also still very young to sit through a long movie; most three year olds can´t (and shouldn´t be able to!) concentrate on a film for longer than 20 or 30 minutes (hence the recommendation that kids under the age of three don´t watch any TV at all, which alas is not possible in a household where there is an older sibling!)

• ligaya
  Apr 16, 2008 at 5:05 pm

  Let’s not forget that while there are generalities, there are also individualities. Most kids learn to read when they start school, but there are 3-5 year olds who read. Some are very physical and must be moving all the time, some are content to play quietly. In fact, I know adults like that - some have to be outside gardening/hiking/playing sports & would run screaming if forced to sit down & watch tv or read a book, and vice versa.

  Personalities are so different and may fall outside their target developmental ages - younger siblings may be more mature than their older siblings, and older ones may be more immature than expected. Some are very clingy and others resoundingly independent.

  I could go on & on - some kids & adults like to dress girly, some like it casual (this applies to both genders, BTW, just like some boys like to play with dolls and some girls like to play with trucks). And I think it would be hard to predict which sibling would have an affinity to music, chess or sudoku - it might be the bookish one, the flamboyant artistic one and/or the ourdoorsy/sporty one.

• ligaya
  Apr 16, 2008 at 5:23 pm

  And speaking of fashion, a Brad fashion video:

  http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/fashion/2008-03-11-celeb-style-brad-pitt_N.htm?POE=click-refer

  Celeb Style: Brad the dad cuts quite a fine figure; see video - USATODAY.com*

• angela
  Apr 16, 2008 at 7:29 pm

  thanks for the video ligaya. i like the part where the host said something like, brad is the only guy that can stand up with angelina in the red carpet - it’s so true. :)

• KELVIN
  Apr 16, 2008 at 8:58 pm

  HEY, IF YOU BRING SHILOH TO THE MOVIE. I BET YOU SHE GOING TO CRY . NOBODY CAN’T WATCH MOVIE. BRAD AND ANGIE HAVE TO GO HOME.BECAUSE SHE BOTHER PEOPLE. I DID TO MY DAUGHTER 1 TIME. I WENT HOME . CAN’T NOT FINISH THE MOVIE. WHO CARE. SHE STILL THEIR DAUGHTER.

• isacutie
  Apr 16, 2008 at 8:59 pm

  Always nice to read/hear about the family taking time out together. Unfortunately, like you said Sherry, there are those commenting again that Shiloh’s been left out. Geez, what do these people want?

• Deni
  Apr 16, 2008 at 9:50 pm

  Ligaya, thanks. I’m well aware of the media machine and how it works. I’ve worked in the business (behind the scenes) for 10 years in NYC. Just me and my two cents about how you can’t really satisfy anyone.

• Hannah
  Apr 16, 2008 at 10:08 pm

  I am with sophia and bee, Zahara has never seemed to miss any family outing due to her age (even when she was Shiloh’s age) so i guess people think why should Shiloh miss out but you know what it just seems so bad because they are in the public eye, im sure if i was in the public eye i would come under fire too as i always seem to have my youngest with me while my 3 year old is at kindy - i only go shopping when she is at kindy as it is easier so if Brad and Ange where just an everyday family out of the spotlight it would not seem so bad and im sure they take no notice of all the whoo haa or they would move away from the spotlight…

• tenika
  Apr 16, 2008 at 11:35 pm

  I Dont Have Any Kids And Even I Know You Cant Take 2 Year Olds To A Movie!!!! Sherry I Dont Think You Should Even Waste Your Time With The ” Wheres Shiloh?” Naysayers Because They WANT To H8te Regardless To What Logic/Reason Demonstrates

• BlessBrangelina
  Apr 17, 2008 at 12:08 am

  It’s your opinion Hannah and you are welcome to it.

  However I just want to know “or they would move away from the spotlight…”

  How Brad and Angie are in the spotlight, besides for work? Maybe you could recommend how they could do more to move away from it, other than fly to the moon.

  I haven’t seen them in Rodeo Dr, at premieres (not own), Book Launches, nor at famous restaurants where their picture will be taken.

  I have seen them walking to the shops with their kids, going to the movies and yet they are still headline news. How can they stop that! Be less in the spotlight…For a while now they have been very LOW KEY!

• Lucy
  Apr 17, 2008 at 12:20 am

  I am so happy to see them enjoying themselves like a typical family going to the movies. Don’t mind the critical people about Shiloh. Haters will always have something bad to say. Thanks Ligaya for the link. I enjoyed it very much.

• sarah
  Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43 am

  Sherry, I have a toddler and I would bring her to a movie theatre. I imagine you are a nice person. And, I notice that you are very biased in your reporting about the Jolie-Pitts. You are not even-handed, and in my opinion, honest about the treatment of Shiloh. It’s not like it is a secret - Shiloh’s exclusion. It is covered in the media. And it is OBVIOUS to anyone with two eyes and empathy (the ability to put oneself in another’s shoes). If you were constantly excluded like Shiloh, how would you feel? Would you do that to one of your kids?

• Lara
  Apr 17, 2008 at 5:40 am

  Being famous is a two folded sword. On the one hand you want the public eye because it is good for promoting movies and it gives attention to humanitarian work. Celebrities live from the press. On the other hand they resent the press when it comes to their personal lives. But ocne the press is alerted it’s just there, no distinction between private life and public life.
  That’ s the price famous people have to pay for a while. It is only a matter of a few years anyways as press attention decreases as soon as successors follow in the footstep of current celebrities and promise an even better income to the paparazzi.
  Best example Bruce willis and Demi Moore a few years ago. They were the golden couple then, now it’s Brad and Angelina. A few years down the line it will be someone else.
  For the time being they will have to put up with all the crazyness around them but it will stop. Perhaps sooner than they actually anticipate.

• Sherry
  Apr 17, 2008 at 6:26 am

  Sarah - If you have a toddler who will sit quietly in a dark theater for two solid hours, that’s great for you. I know for a fact that mine will not. She doesn’t watch anything on TV without running around and doing other things at the same time and she would lose her mind and start making noise or trying to run up and down the aisles, disturbing everyone. As a result, I have no plans to take her to see a movie for at least another year. I didn’t take my oldest either, her first movie was when she was about 3.5 or 4 years old.

  I don’t see any bad “treatment” of Shiloh. You can tell me I’m biased, but I really think that people who WANT to see something wrong are biased and slant everything to fit what they want, so we’ll just go around and around with that debate won’t we? Unless footage comes out of them beating Shiloh or locking her in her room for a week, I don’t buy the thought that they mistreat her or exclude her.

• kim
  Apr 17, 2008 at 8:08 am

  Sara

  Lets remember that Shiloh is not reported in the news but in the tabloids. Although if she was reported on a news program it wouldn’t surprise me since I don’t have any respect for the news programs anymore as they are biase to what sells and not reporting. And just to chime in I took my son to see his first movie when he was three and had to leave (bye bye $40). He did not go again until he was 5, and he still wanted to leave (we did not leave). At 8 he is much better but still does not enjoy sitting for that long. Just to be caty if your 2yr old will sit that long maybe they watch to much tv at home, and you should get them outside more.

• Brangelina Groupie
  Apr 17, 2008 at 8:25 am

  My 8 yr. old still won’t go to the movies. he wants to play outside. He would rather play with his friends than eat. The last time we tried to watch a movie we ended up leaving early. he hates being still that long.
  As far as Shilp is concerned, maybe the paps scare herm maybe there is more of a safety threat for her than the other children. I just don’t believe she is mistreated or left out. She is a pretty thing and they yell her name a lot and it might just scare the tar out of her.

• mélodie
  Apr 17, 2008 at 9:43 am

  it’s really stupid what people can say! shiloh is not excluded! we saw more Z when she was to, but not at the cinema! angie made some activities with maddox without Z, and people didnt say “Angie goes only with Mad, Zahara is excluded”. foe example, when they lived in Paris, angie went to some museums with mad!!!!

• Bee
  Apr 17, 2008 at 9:45 am

  Uh what a discussion, take it easy :)
  What I wanted to point out was, that we have seen Zee more often when she was younger because there were only two kids. But now its a different situation, with four kids. I think its great of Angi and Brad to go out with the kids without a big company of nannys or other stuff, just them and the kids. So under these circumstances it is understandable that they have not taken Shi to the theater. Wether or not Shi would have been quiet (she seems to bee a lovly calm realxed toddler but we do not know) I can imagine that four kids without a nanny are hard to keep calm in a cinema.
  When the new baby or babies will come then Angi and Brad problably will go out with Shi, Pax, Zee and Mad without the newborn one(s) but it does not mean they are less loved its just a different situation….

• mélodie
  Apr 17, 2008 at 10:04 am

  i don’t like to read the comments on other websites cause people say things that hurt me!

  oh, i just want to ask some people here (like sara) : what can i do with a girl from age 2?
  - go to the cinema: NO!
  - go to the swimming pool? No
  - go to the museum? NO!
  - go to the restaurant? NO!
  - go to the video-game shop? NO!
  - go to the park? yes, but they have a great playground at home (where there is no danger for the kid!)
  - go to the zoo? Yes : they did that last summer in NY and shiloh was there
  - go to make a walk? yes: they did that in NOLA
  - go to ride a bike? yes: shiloh was too with them

  i’ve 3 nephew from age between 1and 4: its impossible to make such activities with them: they are too young!

  plus: i remember that angie and brad share moments with shiloh; Do you want some examples?

  http://www.bradpittwatch.com/brad-takes-shiloh-to-the-set/

  http://celebrityjuice.com.au/2007/08/31/angie-back-from-iraq-and-in-zoo-2/

  http://www.gossipboulevard.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/shiloh.jpg

  http://www.angelinajoliewatch.com/angelina-and-shiloh-at-the-met/

  on the tatoo on angie’s arm there is a line for shiloh too!!!!!

• Ashley
  Apr 17, 2008 at 1:39 pm

  I find it interesting that Zee was taken to the movies when she was the same age as Shi. It was reported that they went to see “The Water Horse” I believe.

• lou
  Apr 17, 2008 at 4:55 pm

  I really don’t want to disrepect anyone’s opinion. However, why is it that judgement can be made when people don’t see that much of this family at all, any of them. How many times do they go out without photographers around, so how can anyone say that Shiloh is excluded “all the time”.

  The total time we have seen this or any other celebrity family can probably be counted in hours if not minutes, so to make a statement about “all the time” and neglect is not logical. We see a couple of minutes of their time in a couple of months. No one knows anything else about them or their activities, just because there are no pictures, does not mean they are not doing things together as a family.

  And please just stop with the judgement about Shiloh. Again, I don’t mean to be rude, but what is the obsession?

• gena
  Apr 17, 2008 at 7:02 pm

  SHERRY ,DON;T MIND THOSE KIND OF PEOPLE. THE ONLY TIME ,KIDS YOUNGER THAN 3 SIT STILL IS WHEN THEY ARE SLEEP. I HAVE FOUR OF MY OWN.ALTHOUGH THEY ARE ALL GROWN NOW. SHILOH WILL HAVE A TIME OF HER LIFE SOMETIME SOON SHE HAS SOME GREAT AND LOVING PARENTS. YOU WILL ALL SEE SOMEDAY, THAT SHILOH WILL BE ONE OF A KIND. BE NICE PEOPLE.

• Andrea
  Apr 18, 2008 at 12:54 pm

  Sarah I do not so much agree with you about taking a two year old to the movies but I do feel that if there is one negative thing said about these people then everyone goes crazy , you act as though you know them or something refering to there daughter as ZEE come on !!! and we all have to remember no family is perfect and that everyone makes mistakes even Brad and Angelina, I think you should give poor Sarah a break for just giving a opinion……that is why I never comment much on this sight…..but when I see people getting heat for a opionion I figure I would put in my two sense…..

• ligaya
  Apr 18, 2008 at 1:53 pm

  C’mon, fans & h8ters alike occasionally refer to people by nicknames - like Jen for Jennifer, Jackie for Jacqueline (Kennedy), Z or Zee for Zahara, Mad for Maddox, Indy for Indiana, etc. What’s wrong with that?

  It’s really understandable when a lot of people answer a post that repeats things that tabs & h8ters have repeated over and over again ad nauseam. Maybe the posters who do this are totally innocent of malice, but it’s just their bad luck if we Brangelina fans rise up in defense to set the record straight, much as X-fans rise to hers in other blogs I’ve visited.

  Sarah, you’ve accused Sherry of being biased; Andrea, I take your comment to mean you think that if a lot of people disagree with posts criticizing Brad & Angelina, then those of us who disagree with the criticisms are crazy & wrong. Please correct me if I have the wrong interpretation of your comment.

  Anyone who’s read this blog has to know this is a pro-Brangelina blog. Should we ask Sherry to add ‘fansite’ to “About Pittwatch.com: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Gossip”? I’m not interested in spending equal time dissing them (especially when I know from research that the abuse poured on them, especially Angelina, are untrue and used just to assassinate their characters) as in expressing my admiration - which they have more than deserved and earned.

  Once again, admiration is not blind worship. I’ll criticize Angelina & Brad if I think they warrant it. Her controversial statement about the surge & humanitarian aid which suddenly made her the right-wing’s darling was a topic that people could have various opinions on.

  Everyone correct me I’m wrong, but I believe that Pittwatch is a site for fans of the Jolie-Pitts, and I believe the overwhelming majority of the Pittwatch community are JP fans. Occasionally, there have been a few who disagree with this, but they didn’t stick around.

• ligaya
  Apr 18, 2008 at 1:56 pm

  C’mon, fans & h8ters alike occasionally refer to people by nicknames - like Jen for Jennifer, Jackie for Jacqueline (Kennedy), Z or Zee for Zahara, Mad for Maddox, Indy for Indiana, etc. What’s wrong with that?

  It’s really understandable when a lot of people answer a post that repeats things that tabs & h8ters have said over and over again ad nauseam. Maybe the posters who do this are totally innocent of malice, but it’s just their bad luck if we Brangelina fans rise up in defense to set the record straight, much as X-fans rise to hers in other blogs I’ve visited.

• ligaya
  Apr 18, 2008 at 1:59 pm

  Anyone who’s read this blog has to know this is a pro-Brangelina blog. Should we ask Sherry to add ‘fansite’ to “About Pittwatch.com: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Gossip”? I’m not interested in spending equal time dissing them (especially when I know from research that the abuse poured on them, especially Angelina, are untrue and used just to assassinate their characters) as in expressing my admiration - which they have more than deserved and earned.

  Once again, admiration is not blind worship. I’ll criticize Angelina & Brad if I think they warrant it. Her controversial statement about the surge & humanitarian aid which suddenly made her the right-wing’s darling was a topic that people could have various opinions on.

  Everyone correct me I’m wrong, but I believe that Pittwatch is a site for fans of the Jolie-Pitts, and I believe the overwhelming majority of the Pittwatch community are JP fans. Occasionally, there have been a few who disagree with this, but they didn’t stick around.

• Mary Ann
  Apr 18, 2008 at 4:12 pm

  Melodie, I remember a few months ago you were not sure if you would continue to comment on this website because you felt your English was not good enough. I am so glad that you over came that and your comments are well thought out and expressed. I believe that you are a very loving and caring person and I am glad you stayed with us. Ligaya, you are right as usual, this I believe is website for people who care about the Jolie-Pitts. No we do not know them personally, but are interested in them, their lives and their family. Nothing wrong with that.

• lou
  Apr 18, 2008 at 4:23 pm

  Actually, when the family went to see the Water Horse, Zahara was 3, it was just after she celebrated her birthday in January, so, again, Shiloh is not yet 2. Not the same age at all.

  I like others like to come here to avoid the silliness from the other sites as most here like and respect Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. No, we don’t know them personally, but neither do the people who don’t like them. Again, I don’t understand the logic of it being OK to trash someone you don’t know, but not OK to defend them.

  Of course, it is all just opinion based upon what is read or what they say. I prefer what they say to what is written about them without their knowledge or permission, as it is usually just gossip, and mostly not true, which, unfortunately, is what so many people choose to believe

  Please don’t change.

• isacutie
  Apr 18, 2008 at 7:56 pm

  Ligaya/Lou, you said it well.

• mélodie
  Apr 19, 2008 at 7:54 am

  mary ann: thank you very much.it’s because of great people like yout hat i love to come here and leave some comments!

  ligaya: i think too that this site is for brad and angie fans!

  love you all, it’s great to have people like you to speak with about my favourite family!

• Ashley
  Apr 19, 2008 at 8:56 am

  actually it was right after Christmas (12/26) that they went to go and see “WaterHorse” so she was still 2… check the archives

• le
  Apr 19, 2008 at 9:23 am

  ok, I find all yours comments very interesting and worthly to be read.
  I like this site because it’s seem all of you are honest people.

• Shiloh
  Apr 23, 2008 at 10:48 am

  They said they invented the name Shiloh?
  I am 26 years old, i don’t think so!

• Shiloh
  Apr 23, 2008 at 10:50 am

  Oh ya and its Frank Lloyd Wright’s “Water House”

• Andrea
  Apr 25, 2008 at 8:58 am

  You guys are fierce and I do disagree because The Jolie-Pitts and there family have nicknames for there kids and themselves, and in any other website you never see them it is very personal to them, SORRY, you act as though you know them and it is weird, I wonder what Brad and Angelina would think if they read this stuff,, acting as though you know them and you do not it is crazy!!!!this will the last time I comment…you are all nuts!!!!!

• Sherry
  Apr 25, 2008 at 9:09 am

  What are you even talking about? Most of the celebrity sites I visit refer to “Shi” and “Madd” and Princess Z even. Magazine articles have used Angie instead of always writing Angelina. Many sites use nicknames for all kinds of celebrities, calling Jennifer Jen, or Gwyneth Paltrow Gwynnie, and so on. It’s hardly some sort of weird phenomenon here on Pittwatch. It’s pretty much everywhere. And also really not a big deal.

• carrie
  May 26, 2008 at 3:41 am

  i dont get it shiloh isnt even at the cinima yet every comment is about her and how she is ecluded yet if brad and andelina were too take maddox and pax and shiloh out without zahara no-body would be going oh no wheres Zahara or if they were too take zee,shi, and madd they also wouldnt be going wheres pax and ect..!

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Entertainment
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture

• Social Web
• E-mail