A Therapist’s View of Brangelina
This was sent to me by an anonymous source - if anyone has an online credit, I would be more than happy to post it.
Angelina and Brad are Married Copyright 2006-03-19 By Dr.Grace VanBaden (pseudo-name in order to keep confidentiality rights of patients), Therapist to the Stars, Los Angeles, California
Yes, they are – at least in their minds. They wear rings, travel together, have 3 children and try to live a “normal” life, so why are we as a society so obsessed at witnessing their life? Maybe because in some strange, distorted way, they want us to? It’s called “Celebrity Exhibitionism” in professional lingo. Let’s be honest – if they really wanted to live a “normal” life (and what that means exactly nobody knows), all they had to do is take off their sunglasses in the dark, use a regular rented car rather than a limo, live in deluxe hotels where there are no paparazzi hang-outs, or just go somewhere where nobody would know them – and yes, there are places like that (call me if you need directions!). Celebrities enjoy that attention in some way, otherwise they would have not chosen that profession in the first place. And those who really want to live a “normal” life, can always move to Montana (Demi Moore) or Australia (Mel Gibson). But most of them, if not all, come back after a few years – must be getting lonely, living that “normal” life……..
Tags: Angelina Jolie, Brangelina, Brangelina WeddingWhy are some of us pitying Jennifer Anniston? She is a beautiful woman, has millions in her bank account, all the time in the world to spoil herself? Maybe because many of the women identify with her? How many women are left behind every year for a younger woman? How many are being cheated on at work? How many get divorced and then 5 minutes later, their ex marries another? It happens to a high percentage of all marriages….divorce for all kinds of reasons. But maybe Norman, Jennifer’s dog, was right all along when he was taking a dump almost daily in Brad’s closet? Maybe he had a sixth sense about this relationship? Trust your dog’s instincts! But please don’t pity Jennifer – there are so many women who do not have the opportunities like she does….not to mention all the wives who get left behind with children to cake care of and never see their exes again. She gets to see hers every day in the news!
Brad, you are the morphing king – he now has dark hair and sideburns like Billy Bob, wears nothing but dark clothes and a black cap…Brad always manages to start looking like his girlfriends – a narcissistic, perfectionist trait or rather a part of an actor’s personality?
Angelina has found a man she can control – perfect for her therapy with getting over disappointments with men, starting with her own father. Brad follows her around like a happy puppy dog to all her UN assignments, stops smoking for her, takes care of her children, and leaves his wife…it’s a great example for all men to live a healthy life with their girlfriends. It was nice that Brad waited for the divorce to be final, before announcing and for the world found out that the women he claimed “was only a great friend”, carried his child.
Angelina is a strong independent woman who does a lot of good work with her celebrity status. No doubt about it. And just because she had an affair with a lesbian woman when she was younger (didn’t we all?), does not make her bi-sexual. It’s called experimenting with you sexuality. However, it is to hope that it does not develop into a fetish, her love for Asians (Maddox does look like her lesbian lover a bit?). Kissing your brother publicly is also not a crime, but much more a typical provocation act by Angelina to break the rules….and get attention? Isn’t it part of an actress duty to live out their personal life as public? You cannot just become famous, make millions, and then want to keep your life private. It would have been nice if celebrities, politicians, actors and other public figures would use that power for good things more often than bad ones. So, I vote for charity work being a better choice than corruption and drug scandals.
And now, let’s talk about Michael Douglas – he has a nerve talking. Having marital problems for years with his ex-wife (does sex anonymous ring a bell?) and then marrying a much younger woman himself….don’t throw with stones when you live in a glasshouse yourself. And carrying adopted children around, as he says, should be an honour to anybody. I wish more single mothers (and couples of course) would have the opportunity to adopt children, but it seems to be a privilege reserved to jet-setting celebrities like Angelina Jolie, Meg Ryan, and Sharon Stone. And please, all your single celeb moms with adopted children – don’t just be selfish - help other single moms to being able to adopt as well by establishing a charity or foundation and by changing the laws about this. It is a disappointment to some degree that Angelina let Brad adopt them so quickly, just because she has had bad luck with men according to her and she was such a poster child for single moms being able to do a great job alone. In a case of a divorce, she would have to fight over custody, even though she was the one adopting these children in the first place….but as independent as Angelina is, she might have provided for some secret legal clause to cover that issue hopefully.
Back to Brad and Angelina – a little over-the-counter advice - if they really want to give their lovely children a rather normal life, then let them stay in one place to develop healthy relationships with other children – its called socializing. Travelling from place to place, even in style, is still not the same as having play dates with regular friends and going to pre-school. No “normal” kids can approach them when they are constantly surrounded by bodyguards. No parent love can make up for the needs of learning how to play well with others.
+++
Copyright 2006-03-19
By Dr.Grace VanBaden (pseudo-name in order to keep confidentiality rights of patients), Therapist to the Stars, Los Angeles, California
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Brangelina, Brangelina Wedding
67 opinions for A Therapist’s View of Brangelina
Patricia20
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:41 am
hello…well i agree they are married at last in their minds..
well they are in Paris is it?
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:48 am
Well, still in France anyway. Ugh. LOL
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:50 am
If they really want to keep it private, they could have gotten married in some little place in France while everybody was looking in Italy ….I have a feeling they did it already.
Annie
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:51 am
I sugget this therapist should see a THERAPIST … to seek treatment for his/her ENVY!
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:54 am
Ha ha ha - it is interesting to read between the lines, isnt it - how about this comment - “And just because she had an affair with a lesbian woman when she was younger (didn’t we all?), does not make her bi-sexual. ” Ha ha ha ;) Didn’t we all??
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:55 am
Great article!!! No envy, just valid observations and actually stimulating opinions - a fresh view.
Annie
Mar 25, 2006 at 8:03 am
The therapist is twisting facts. Michael Douglas never said that”carrying adopted children around, as he says, should be an honour to anybody.”. He actually said something (in GQ) like “leaving a beautiful woman to hold ORPHANSfor Angelina”.
Actually this therapist is an apologist for JEN and MIchael Douglas.
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 8:56 am
Dee- I´m sorry but I don´t agree with ypou. What was that about Angie controlling Brad. A little biased don´t you think? I can´t believe people are still believing Angie is controlling Brad in this! Can´t they see they have a healthy relationship where they are a team and there´s no one dominating or engaging in a submissive role in the relationsgip?
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 8:59 am
Annie - ITA with you. I sense this therapist is actually slapping Brad and Angelina pretending she´s praising them. Why is she sounding like she´s justifying Angelina´s past when she seems actually throwing the “fetishe” issue on her face?
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:02 am
Diane,
I dont think its meant in a bad way…on the contrary, why can’t it be ok for some men when women are in charge? I think its obvious that Angelina is a strong woman and Brad a more passive follower (now he wants to become an UN ambassador as well) - nothing wrong with that if it works for them. I agree with you on having an equal sharing relationship as an ideal - but who has an ideal relationship? Lets be real!!!
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:06 am
Sorry are you Dee from Tam´s board?
Because I don´t agree with that PV, so simple as that! They are making him sound he lost his personality. Just she´s a strong and independent woman, that doesn´t mean Brad had to follow her everywhere like a puppy. He has his own tastes, goals and stuff, he has interested in hbhumanitarian aspects much before hooking up with her.
And BTW, I didn´t say they had an ideal relationship. Please don´t twist my words.
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:17 am
No, I am not Dee from Tam’s board. I did not twist your words - I said I agree with you on the concept of an ideal relationship. I accept your PV - hope you can accept mine. I like both Brad and Angelina. I happen to think, after meeting both, that Angelina is a strong woman and Brad a passive type man. I think it might work for them just fine. We can like people with all their strenghts and faults - nobody is perfect!
And just for kicks check out this link:
http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/2006/01/27/brad_pitt_is_a_chameleon.html
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:20 am
Like you said Christina - read between the lines. I loved your sentence there. I sense this “therapist” is on team Aniston… I´m so sick of the theory of Brad morphing into his girlfriend´s tastes: it started with Juliette Lewis, than it was Paltrow (Yuck), Aniston and the golden locks, and now Angie. There is no evidence he wants to be a Goodwill Embassor as well, he´s just with Angie like anyone in a relationship should support his/her partner. Like I said he was long before working in humanitarian aspects (The One Campaingn, the stem cells research, I´m sure Christine knows much more about this than me), actually I believe this was another ruture point betwen him and his previous wife. They didn´t share the same interests. Now they are saying his clothes are dark just because Angie is always dressing black… please… He doesn´t have to be cut and clean all the time, he´s not making a movie and he´s not going down a red carpet. And the final part of the article, is actually an insult to Angie and Brad. If she let him adopt the children, giving them the “Pitt” surname when she isn´t yet married to him, that involves a lot. Implying she might be doing this with some sort of “secret legal clause” in tow is disrespectful to this couple´s level of commitment. Again she´s implying Brad is just a babby-sitter rather than their father.
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:47 am
Ok, I´m sorry Dee. It´s just that you use the same username of other person in JJ and Tam´s board hence me asking. I thought you were the same person, who actually lives in the same place as I. Forgive me the misunderstanding.
Of course I understand your POV. It´s just that by reading that therapist article, I had a very clear idea that she was talking down Brad on that article by “poisonly praising” Angelina.
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 9:49 am
I dont think this therapist is on any team - and definite not Aniston’s ….maybe Norman’s team? Woof woof :)
Opinions, observations, pro and contra comments…some very valid points….I think its just meant to stimulate thought.
JLS
Mar 25, 2006 at 10:19 am
Dear friends of Brad,Ange and Pittwatch:
If this “article” was written by either a therapist or even an educated person, I’ll eat my hat! My husband is a psychologist and I have a Master’s Degree in English. The statements she/he makes in the writing are so full of grammatical mistakes it’s laughable. In addition, she says things no psychologist or well-trained counselor would ever say. The problems in both areas are so numerous it would take far too long and take up too much space to point them out here. Please, please don’t give this any credence. The writer has made a fool of herself and doesn’t even recognize it. If anyone wants me to do a thorough dissection of the article, ask Christina for my email address. I’ll be glad to do it. How this ever got to be accepted as legitimate I will never understand.
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 10:40 am
LOL I thought this might “inspire” some conversation. Let me just say, that this article was written by a “therapist” that wishes to remain anonymous, and was sent to me from someone who also wishes to remain anonymous. Always take these things into consideration, and don’t take anything too seriously anyway. :)
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 10:41 am
I agree - dont take things sooooo seriously….maybe its a dog therapist :)
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 10:43 am
LOL Dee - or just a therapist in her own mind! People LOVE to stir things up in the world, this is one persons attempt. Find the humor and move on. :)
JLS
Mar 25, 2006 at 11:07 am
Christina, you hit the nail on the head. Written by a “therapist” who wishes to remain anonymous and sent to you by someone who wishes to remain anonymous. Lots of laughs here guys so Christina offered us a lot of fun this morning.
Keishcoggins
Mar 25, 2006 at 11:31 am
They are not a couple! She is crazy and obsessed with entrapping thru those kids.
bamz9LOVE
Mar 25, 2006 at 1:03 pm
If this person is a therapist, then I’m rocket scientist. It sounds like the wannabe couch pilot is a envious dolt.
bamz9LOVE
Mar 25, 2006 at 1:12 pm
Dee, this person has simply taken every negative observation made since Brad & Angelina have been together, and strung them into one long piece of anti Jolie-Pitt crapola. There’s not one thing here “and some almost word for word,” that haven’t read already. Of course if it fits into what some believe about them, then yeah, I can see some finding it unbiased, honest, and true.”
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 2:22 pm
ITA bamz9Love. That´s why I can´t take things so lightly! All I´ve been doing is to efut awful remarks from BAMZ haters in all places and even some pseudo BAMZ fans on another board!
Diane
Mar 25, 2006 at 2:44 pm
Everyone should just let Brad and Angelina do whatever the hell they want to do. I myself think that they’re an amazing couple. I’m sure they don’t enjoy the cameras in their faces, but it does come with fame. They also appear to know what family is about. The kids are always with them. They’re great humanitarians. Brad seems like the kind of man any woman would want at her side. Forget his looks. He is a good man. Enough said.
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 2:56 pm
Got y’all stirred up this morning, didn’t I? Hee hee. :)
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 3:09 pm
Huh! Apparently there´s another DIANE here! Please don´t gt all mixed up guys! Lol!
Dee
Mar 25, 2006 at 3:17 pm
Not to get away from the too serious questions….does anybody know the brand of jacket M is wearing…with the furry hood…its too cute….
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 3:18 pm
BTW: this leads me to a question I´ve been meaning to ask you Christina since the beginning and I always forget… :)
Is there any registration process in PittWatch? This way the each of us could maintain his/her username and wouldn´t be able to post with any other… I ask this because so many people are complaining at JustJared they are not the authors of some comments there which appear signed as such. :(
Pearl
Mar 25, 2006 at 5:28 pm
You know before there was Angelina(God Bless Her). There were and are many people who have
adopted children.Over the years many have adopted in America.
The death of Adult family members from AIDS has left a void. African and other children third world children need to be adopted.
They are the worlds future, and as quiet as it is kept they can grow with love and compassion or
become future terrorist.
There are religious groups that will use children,to raise them to be their soldiers.
We who believe in freedom have to guide those we can reach to be soldiers of love and not hate.
There is a much bigger picture than the Pitt and Jolie thing. Open your eyes and see. Open your minds and think.
We all fight to win or we just lay on our asses and bull_.
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:38 pm
Registration - well - you can try under Meta in the right hand colum at the bottom registering - whre it says Log in (I think…it doesn’t say that for me), honestly I am not sure what it will do. But, if the occasion ever comes up that you need me to remove a comment by an imposter, you know you can email me. Let me know what it does when you try to register…
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:41 pm
Ok, I set it so you can register - there is a setting I can change that says “Must be logged in and registered to comment” but I am leaving that turned off for now. There certainly may be a time where I need to turn it on though.
Diana
Mar 25, 2006 at 7:55 pm
Ok thank you Christina! :)
Christina
Mar 25, 2006 at 8:02 pm
My first registered user! Woohoo! :)
Marie
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:33 am
The most important rule for a therapist is to make no assumptions or judgments about people’s behavior and situations. The second important rule is that a therapist must then gather enough information FROM THE CLIENT to understand the his/her/their situation, values, reasoning, choices, etc. How this “therapist” can say the things she does about people she’s not even met is beyond me. No, no! Bad bad therapist!
Diana
Mar 26, 2006 at 7:19 am
Lol! Thank you! :)
Dee
Mar 26, 2006 at 10:01 am
Aren’s we judgemental ouselves? Anybody, even a therapist, can have opinions, views and commentaries about people…as long as they are not telling secrets their clients told them. And why assume its a psychotherapist? Maybe its a music therapist? Or a physical therapist? Geeeeeeeeeeee whiz…………………..
Diana
Mar 26, 2006 at 10:44 am
Marie Says:
March 26th, 2006 at 6:33 am
The most important rule for a therapist is to make no assumptions or judgments about people’s behavior and situations. The second important rule is that a therapist must then gather enough information FROM THE CLIENT to understand the his/her/their situation, values, reasoning, choices, etc. How this “therapist” can say the things she does about people she’s not even met is beyond me. No, no! Bad bad therapist!
Great comment Marie. As a therapist she was not abiding by those two rules you´ve mentioned. It´s not ethical. She is entitled to her own opinion but by the moment she addresses a personal opinion as a therapist she must be unbiased. She cannot make personal remarks clearly tending to one side.
Dee
Mar 26, 2006 at 1:12 pm
Massage therapist must gather enough information from the client? :):)
Susie
Mar 26, 2006 at 1:51 pm
You are kidding right Dee? I assume so with the smilie face there.
It’s only logical that a person who would call himself/herself a “therapist” and talk about the lives of people would be some form of psychologist, psychiatrist, etc.
Of course EVERYONE has an opinion, or else there would be no comments at all, BUT if you are going to say I AM A THERAPIST AND THIS IS WHAT I THINK. Then by all means, people can comments on those words and whether they make sense or not coming from a supposed ‘therapist’.
If it’s just another commentary, then don’t label yourself a ‘therapist’ and then judge them. The assumption is that you are basing those judgements with your ‘therapist’ hat on.
bamz9LOVE
Mar 26, 2006 at 2:46 pm
40 Susie said:
“If it’s just another commentary, then don’t label yourself a ‘therapist’ and then judge them. The assumption is that you are basing those judgements with your ‘therapist’ hat on”
Applause!
ita
Diana
Mar 26, 2006 at 5:29 pm
Why do I think this person, this so called therapist is having a good laugh at our expenses?
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:16 pm
Because she no doubt is, Diana. I wrote a long critique of the article and submitted it here but I think Christina may have considered it too long and too negative. Don’t know for sure but it definitely was both. Ms. Pseudo-name(as the fake Dr. Fraud spelled it) fooled a few of us and certainly riled us up! We need to drop her and move on. We’ve given her far too much attention. If my critique ever appears, you’re going to have a big laugh over that last statement!
Diana
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:24 pm
Oh I´d love to read your critique JLS. If you don´t mind, maybe you can send it to me via Christina, she could email me your text.
And it´s like you said. I think sometimes we let ourselves tie up by refuting every singgle negative comment that comes across about BAMZ and sometimes there´s no use. They keep coming and coming no matter what you say, no matter all you try to explain them, refuting all the points and you find yourself devoid of energy and the haters keep going there with other names and other “pseudo-articles”. I must confess that I´m not going to Just Jared anymore because of that. Everytime one clicks on a BAMZ thread, you find more than 500 posts of pure hate.
Christina
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:27 pm
JLS, I emailed you - just to let you guys know, we have a list of words that are normally used by spammers that the software will just automatically nuke the comment. They are all “spammy” words and nasty ones too - but I know bamz had a problem posting as well as JLS, and I expect that they had a word in there that caused it to go in the nuke. Could be the end of one word combined with the beginning of the next word- but I sent the list to you, JLS, and to bamz the other day, and if you all figure out what word it might be, I will take it off the list! Hope this made sense - I am running around here tonight like a chicken with my head cut off - I will be back in full force in the morning - hope you all had a great weekend!
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:28 pm
I forgot to ask if any of you read the report about JA planning a wedding to VV this summer at Oprah’s lavish Chicago estate? It says she wants to outdo B&A and do something on the order of a Liz Taylor extravaganza. Perhaps she thinks the gorgeous wedding will make up for the bridegroom who can never measure up to the gorgeous Brad Pitt!! If anyone finds out anything please let us know. As always, we of course have to take every gossip morsel with several grains of salt.
One more thing—-there is more about Brad’s bruises. Does anyone think there may have been a family brawl? I simply can’t imagine it and so so hope it isn’t true. I couldn’t see the bruises or black eye in the pictures but other viewers claimed to be able to.
Still love the Jolie-Pitts. And kudos to Christina for all the work she does for us!!!
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:41 pm
Thanks Christina and Diana. Sadly, my critique was written off-the-cuff and I have no way of retrieving it. However, I am one of those computer-challenged people and if you know how I could “get it back” so-to-speak, I would more than gladly send it to you, D. I can’t imagine any word I used that would have been disallowed. I don’t swear, curse or speak in any way (that I know of) that even the TV censors would delete. Very strange! It was so long I don’t think I could begin to remember it but I guess I could try to write a new version. If I do, Diana, I’ll send it to you via Christina.
Christina
Mar 26, 2006 at 6:51 pm
I’m so sorry JLS, I wonder if there is a comment length that makes it trash the comments. Like I said though, it may have been the end of one of your words combined with the letters of the next word that caused the problem. I will see if there is something I can do about that so it doesn’t happen anymore. I despise losing your thoughts, and I am so sorry (and to you too, bamz!).
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 7:17 pm
Diana, just so you’ll know (I emailed Christina about this), I found the word on C’s list that caused my comments to be nuked. . .a synonym of the word “embarrassed”!! Can you imagine that after all the vile language that appears on so many blogs? I’m going to try to re-do my critique just for you because I’m immensely flattered that you would want to read it. Mostly, I took the article and showed how her descriptions of clinical words such as “narcissistic” do not match the official definitions in the Diagnostical and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—the official text used by all psychologists,psychiatrists and therapists in the U.S. I also examined in a very professorial manner her misuse of the English language. It seems to me that a person who is capable of graduating from a Masters Level program at any college or university would, of necessity, be able to use proper language as well as logic in writing a copywrited article. Don’t you agree? Actually, my little essay made my husband laugh so maybe if I can re-create it you will enjoy it!
bamz9LOVE
Mar 26, 2006 at 7:19 pm
JLS said:
“One more thing—-there is more about Brad’s bruises. Does anyone think there may have been a family brawl? I simply can’t imagine it and so so hope it isn’t true. I couldn’t see the bruises or black eye in the pictures but other viewers claimed to be able to.”
What makes you think this?! I could never in a million years fathom fisticuffs between Brad & Angelina for any reason. If it is really true that there was bruising etc “regardless of his rep’s denial”, I still would have a hard time believing domestic violence occurred. This is really disturbing to me (”can you tell?” lol)
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 7:31 pm
Dear, dear Bamz9Love:
Please forgive me for even thinking the thought much less putting it in writing. Of course I don’t believe it and I don’t blame you for being disturbed. I spend hours defending these two on the various blogs so I know how you must be feeling. I guess I had just read it in so many places today and wondered if anyone had any thoughts on the subject. Obviously,I don’t think there were fisticuffs between them. Shame on me. I think I’m exhausted from spending so much time on the web today. If you read the earlier comments here, i spent almost two hours writing a critique of that so-called therapist and it got nuked because of my use of a very innocent word.
Bamz, I am a big fan of yours so hope this wont create a problem in the future. I see your name everywhere supporting and defending the Jolie-Pitts and I appreciate you more than you know. Forgive?
bamz9LOVE
Mar 26, 2006 at 9:12 pm
Oh please, no apologies here! No need at all, I just didn’t know if you found something that had “legs” saying the possibility was there. Please, if anything I should have worded it less frantically lol. You and I suffer from the same malady today, “blog-iteus”, and after reading some of the things I have, it’s a wonder I’m sane enough to type this lol. I appreciate your kind words, and your posts which I enjoy immensely. I love this site immensely! I sincerely appreciate Christina providing this wonderful place to share with others are support for the Jolie-Pitt clan.
JLS
Mar 26, 2006 at 9:28 pm
Bamz:
Thanks so much for your response. I hate upsetting people that I admire. I, too, appreciate your posts. Do you visit JJ anymore? It’s almost impossible to read through all the awful stuff people write there and the thing I love about Pittwatch and C. is that the people here are kind, seem to be almost all supporters of BAMZ and, in addition, they can express themselves with intelligence. They seem to be more accurate observers of the J-P scene and draw sensible conclusions.
Did anyone catch the repeat of Angelina on Actor’s Studio tonight? She has so much more maturity and poise than. . .well. . .other interviewees I’ve seen.
Goodnight, friends. It has been an interesting day in the Jolie-Pitt world. Diana, I’ll do my best to re-write the critique of the Dr. Fraud (my new favorite name for the fake “therapist to the Stars!!) article and will send it to you via Christina.
Christina
Mar 26, 2006 at 10:20 pm
Just to let you know, I changed the settings here so everything will come through me to moderate if it has one of those words in it - and I got rid of the word that JLS thought might have been the problem. Although, I do want to say that it isn’t a bad idea to get in the habit of at least highlighting and copying your longer posts before subnitting them, you never know when your computer, or our servers will hiccup. But let me know if you all have any more problems with posts disappearing - I hope the problem is taken care of now! Have a great night, I really am going to bed now. :)
Dee
Mar 26, 2006 at 11:44 pm
I thought the bruising was maybe part of the Judo training with Little M? Nobody ever answered me on the question about the jacket?
Diana
Mar 27, 2006 at 5:29 am
Thank you JLS for all the hard trouble you´re having. I was indeed curious to read your text as you write so eloquently (something that I unfortunatelly lack*blushes*) and I´m sure your text was very pleasant to read. So do not worry if you cannot retrieve it.
Also Christina I noticed that yesterday I had to write twice my post commenting Marie here in this thread. I didn´t know what happened but it vanished as well, or wasn´t even submitted. I cannot remember what was the exact words on it, so I had to write it again and so there is.
Diana
Mar 27, 2006 at 5:36 am
JLS - regarding the news about JA marrying with VV this Summer, I saved a Life and Style scan yesterday, about her marrying sooner than the expected. Not that I believe it, but it was n interesting reading about how she suddenly is putting all her efforts on a fast marriage with VV in order to beat Brngelina to the altar. Tell me something if you´re interested in reading it.
If Christina is interested also I can post here or wherever she wishes to, or even email you.
JLS
Mar 27, 2006 at 10:48 am
Diana, I would very much like to see the article you scanned from Life and Style about the VV/JA supposed wedding. Thank you also for your kind words about my writing. I’ve worked on the re-do of the critique but as I said, it is long and is taking some time. I’ll send it to Christina today or tomorrow. By the way, I don’t mind if you have my email address. If you want it, you can ask C. for it and she has my permission to send it to you.
Diana
Mar 27, 2006 at 12:02 pm
Thank you JLS. In that case I will send the L&S scan to you directly through my email and you can have mine as well! :)
bamz9LOVE
Mar 27, 2006 at 1:38 pm
JLS, JJ is probably where I go as much as here. I’m “Original jpf” there.
Susie
Mar 28, 2006 at 12:02 am
Ohh wouldn’t it be a total HOOT if she married within days of Angelina giving birth? In an attempt to bump BAMZ off the cover of the magazines. Now that I can see happening.
Susie
Mar 28, 2006 at 12:04 am
Oh wait probably wrong section to comment in about a VV-JA wedding.
kelli
Mar 30, 2006 at 11:52 pm
keishcoggins—–didn’t your parents teach you….if you don’t have anything nice to say , don’t say anything at all!!! We are here to share our love of THE BRAD—play nice. And for the record YES THEY ARE A COUPLE AND WHAT A HORRIBLE THING TO SAY ABOUT ANGELINA!!! Hey are you related to Michael Douglas?
ai
Mar 31, 2006 at 1:57 pm
Very clever to pass yourself as therapist and give credence to your opinion. Nice move! Aren’t therapist suppose to sit with patients before they come up with analysis since it is very irresponsible to do so prior to sitting with patients? By the way, where did this therapist got his/her/it’s credentials, is it in “Norman’s” psycho sch for the dog?
laura
Apr 1, 2006 at 7:01 am
hmmmmmm well put I thought..
laura
Apr 1, 2006 at 7:12 am
p.s I dont think Jennifer is going to get married …she does not seem like the type for a shot gun wedding .. I cant see her with that guy anyway…they look all wrong for each other but then again ..there is more to love then looks!..J seems to take relationships very serious….I also think its good to not get too involved in this Brad and angie thing as if they care what you think anyways… ha ha…I put it this way I wouldnt freak out if I saw a star and break down crying…just yesterday I saw the black eyed peas while traveling back to London…I have seen alot of stars in Nevis…when we use to live at the four seasons hotel there…I just dont get the whole deal with this..hmmmmmmmm how to put it adoration love…not sure if that is the correct term…I find it a bit high schoolish….but that is just my opinion…..I dont mind if anyone one else agrees with that as we are all entitled to live our own lifes how we see fit…and as far as spelling mistakes go…we all make them…….do ignore mine…I am just a person…grammer was not my thing …..
Mellia
Apr 6, 2006 at 11:43 am
All I can say is that some people will believe anything they read huh? Obvious to me at the get this therapist was a fraud. I guess just another JA fan trying to up her gal by discrediting AJ & BP.
SO onvious. Sure wish the best for Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt. I hope JA can just shup up about them as well. Not an interview goes by she doesn’t make reference to Brad. She must still love that guy.
Thank goodness catherine Keener cut her of at the chase before Jen could open her mouth and drag it on…& on..&..on.
What does your therapist say about JA? Hmmmmmmmmm?
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: