Angelina Jolie Beowulf Interview
This video interview is awesome. Angelina Jolie speaks in an interview about Beowulf, as well as everyone’s favorite topic lately, her life as a mother to her and Brad Pitt’s awesome kids. I’m so excited about the release of Beowulf that I need videos like this to tide me over until I can see it!
(Source)
Technorati Tags: angelina jolie, angelina jolie video, angelina jolie interview, angelina jolie interview video, beowulf
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Angelina Jolie, Movies, Video
59 opinions for Angelina Jolie Beowulf Interview
heaven
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:06 pm
is it so bad to wish that she may be pregnant? she is the epitome of a woman… she’s normal like us, we go through stages in life, she made some decisions that does not conform to the norms of life. i find it funny that people scorn her because she is constantly changing herself for the better…. she had her moment to live for herself, now she lives for others… who doesnt admire that?
irma
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:25 pm
She looks really beautiful with or without make up. She is such a good mother, partner to Brad & humanitarian. I really admire her more . I guess, in no time, she will get pregnant again, for now, it is still early, the kids are still very young.
BlessBrangelina
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:28 pm
Thanks for the video, Sherry. Love the format of it and she wasn’t asked to discuss her personal life for once, that’s cool!
Passerby
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:31 pm
I really like Angie’s appearance in this interview.
The hair is really nice to the point that I’m going to try my hair like that tomorrow.
I love watching interviews instead of reading cause you can seee her use her hands and pauses. Like at the parks she’s thinking and what words are empahized.
Angie looks really content with her life right now. She’s smiling. and her skin is radiant.
MY IDOL GETS PERFECTER!!!
tia leona
Nov 13, 2007 at 10:30 pm
did u hear about zaharas real family wantin her back?!
Children First
Nov 13, 2007 at 10:40 pm
Hello everyone,
Thanks Sherry for your lovely site: It is always a joy to visit. I would just like to share with you guys my latest video. I hope you like it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFMjzd-zGvY
ligaya
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:21 pm
Ditto, BlessBrangelina. Let’s hear it for fewer personal questions, more on her work. She looks rested & relaxed here.
Thanks Sherry, you did it again. Which media did the interview?
ligaya
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:54 pm
Angelina has an article in the latest Economist!:
World must target crimes against humanity in 2008: Jolie
Tue Nov 13, 12:04 PM ET
LONDON (AFP) - Prosecuting the perpetrators of genocide and other crimes against humanity is the best way to prevent further atrocities, actress Angelina Jolie said, urging tougher action in 2008.
“Accountability is perhaps the only force powerful enough to break the cycle of violence and retribution that marks so many conflicts,” the Hollywood star wrote in The Economist magazine’s “The World in 2008″, out on Wednesday.
The actress, who is a goodwill ambassador to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), said she hoped the coming year will see the international community seek “true accountability” for victims, particularly in Darfur.
“Through accountability we can begin the process of righting past wrongs, and even change the behaviour of some of the world’s worst criminals,” she said.
In the full-page article seen by AFP on Tuesday, she said international tribunals like those set up after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda or following conflict in the Balkans have the power to change behaviour.
Jolie — one of a number of high-profile world figures to contribute to the publication — said she had met a teenage boy from Darfur on a recent UNHCR mission to a refugee camp in neighbouring Chad who said he wanted those responsible to be put on trial.
“I hope that the Sudanese government will hand over the government minister and the Janjaweed militia leader who have been indicted for war crimes (by the International Criminal Court in The Hague), and that the teenager I met in Chad will get the trial he seeks,” she added.
“I hope that those responsible for the atrocities in Darfur will be held to account, not only for that young man’s sake, but for the world’s.”
ligaya
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:58 pm
Jolie writes for Economist annual
Caitlin Fitzsimmons Guardian Unlimited
Tuesday, November 13 2007
Jolie: has acted as a goodwill ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
To her roles as Hollywood actress, UN goodwill ambassador and mother, Angelina Jolie can now add another - writer for the Economist.
The high-minded economic and political weekly has secured a sprinkling of stardust for The World in 2008, which is published tomorrow and contains predictions for next year.
Jolie’s piece on accountability for the atrocities in Darfur sits alongside contributions from several presidents, an exiled god-king, the head of the United Nations and other political heavyweights.
The annual spin-off to the Economist retails for £4.95 and covers topics ranging from global warming to the politics of Latin America.
Now in its 22nd year, the publication is sold internationally and will remain on news-stand shelves all year.
The field of high-profile contributors includes French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Mexican president Felipe Calderón, the Dalai Lama, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, and Korean-born UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon.
The Economist has also made audio interviews with the authors available to download as podcasts, available from http://www.economist.com/theworldin.
ligaya
Nov 14, 2007 at 12:02 am
Excerpts from the article are under moderation.
I’m totally stoked (archaic slang to most of you :-) )! What an accomplishment for Angelina! Already on popsugar the Angelina critics say this article was ghostwritten.
Lucy
Nov 14, 2007 at 12:57 am
Great interview. Thank you Sherry. You are awesome. Ligaya, Angie is very intelligent. She is indeed beauty and brains and talent. Critics and “trolls” want to put her down to get their 15 minutes of fame too. I bought the AMH DVD over the weekend. It was the last one on the Blockbuster shelf. Yes fellow pinays, I like some of the old stars like Susan Roces, Fernando Poe Jr. (R.I.P.) I even have a couple of VHS of Susan.
anamanzana
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04 am
Not ghostwritten - AJ has the capacity and probably one of the uniquely qualified people to speak on the subject because of her interest and many, many visits there….but probably edited - which ALL articles must have.
dianad1968
Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58 am
ligaya, popsugar is not much better than d’listed or perez. one of the moderators, molly writes the most snarky comments on angie. they live to hate there.
i remember in one of her interviews, cant remember if it was print or tv, she said brad reads all of her articles before she submits them. they are really a force to be reckoned with.
Aurora
Nov 14, 2007 at 1:35 pm
She’s so pretty in that interview. She looks radiant, her skin is glowing and she looks happy. I’m so happy for her!
MOZ
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:36 pm
I always visit the site, but never post. I really enjoy reading and seeing the latest of the Jolie-Pitt family! Unfortunatley, at work I cannot access videos with sound…can anyone be kind enough to type up a couple of the highlights of the interview?? I would be so glad!
cee
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Why do the rags like In Touch And L& S hate Angie so much? She makes Brad happy . She loves her children. This last hit about Zahara’s real mother wanting her back huts not just Angie but Brad slo. They both love Z and it is disgusting. I wish I could do something other than just not but those rags.
Janie
Nov 14, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Good interview, thanks. Also happy about the Economist. She also did a great job on an article for the Washington Post, so she is very talented.
Just as an FYI, People Magazine corrected their incorrect story about the “tear in the pants”. Good to know that some magazines are willing to correct mistakes on ocassion. Thanks again.
Mary Ann
Nov 14, 2007 at 5:06 pm
tia leona, I saw a mention of this also early this morning on a local NY station. They were quoting one of the gossip magazine’s. I have learned from this site and my own personal experience that only People gives accurate stories. And I have been looking on People on and off all day and have seen nothing. They said that Zahara’s mother claims she never signed any adoption papers. Zahara was in very poor medical condition when Angelina and Brad brought her to the States. In fact Angelina took her to her friend the ped. doctor in NY and she put her in the hospital. And if my memory serves me right Brad came back from that trip sick also. If any one was to try to take Zahara away from the Jolie-Pitt’s it would be horrible.
irma
Nov 14, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Lucy, like you I like Susan Roces & FPJ. Angie’s looks reminds me of Susan.
By the way, We are going to see Beowulf at IMax Theater on Saturday, Ligaya said it’s a lot better to see it on 3D so that’s what we are going to do (my husband & I), we are driving 45 minutes to go to Imax, it’s a bit expensive but it’s worth the money specially if it’s Angie’s movie.
Goonight everyone. Have to cook dinner Pancit guisado.
irma
Nov 14, 2007 at 5:18 pm
I meant on the movie “Changeling” that Angie reminds me of Susan.
K
Nov 14, 2007 at 6:47 pm
She does look like she’s gaining some weight, you can see it in her face. She looks healthier, however, why does her forehead look gigantic? Or has it always been that big? Kinda looks like her hair is receding. Maybe it’s the flat hair. Also, didn’t hear her talk about her family in this video. Not sure what you all listened to.
K
Nov 14, 2007 at 6:50 pm
awaiting moderation? why, because I voiced an opinion and it doesn’t agree with yours? Geez, so many people forgot what our country stands for : FREEDOM … which includes freedom of speech. Look it up.
Lili May
Nov 14, 2007 at 6:58 pm
Thank you for the video Sherry! I love it! Thanks to Ligaya, too for the excerpts from the Economist article! Angie wrote an op-ed piece on the same topic for the Washington Post a few months ago. It was very well written and the author was identified as Angelina Jolie, a Goodwill Ambassador to the UNHCR. To Irma, your pancit guisado is starting to make me feel hungry!
Sherry
Nov 14, 2007 at 7:56 pm
K - Many comments get flagged for moderation for no visible reason, based on IP address or key words that are frequently linked to spam. Some of my most common commenters get moderated for no good reason sometimes just because of one word. People often leave complimentary comments that get flagged because they use the word “sexy” but it has to be that way because otherwise you would not believe how many spam comments you would see on this blog - I know because I have to delete them all manually.
I try to put moderated comments through as quickly as I can but I’m always busy doing a lot of different things and sometimes I can’t get to it immediately.
Also, for what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s that uncommon for a forehead to appear bigger if the hair is brushed straight back from it.
irma
Nov 14, 2007 at 9:28 pm
Lili May, the pancit is good, my future daughter in law (An American) is here with us for a visit & she likes it. I was surprised, she never tasted any Filipino foods, this is her first.
Okay fans, maybe there will be another sightings of Brangelina tomorrow.
Saturday, My husband & I will watch Beowulf at Imax, I can’t wait.
Sherry
Nov 14, 2007 at 9:32 pm
Irma, I’ve never had Filipino food so I looked up what Pancit is and it sounds delicious!
isacutie
Nov 15, 2007 at 4:45 am
thanks for posting the economist essay, ligaya. i’ve been trying to get access to it and not succeeding. good for angie. she’s always been very articulate, so i really don’t believe the stuff she’s written are ghostwritten.
and sherry, yep, pancit is delicious and there are actually several types of pancit. and might i add, it’s nice to see so many pinays posting here. i’m assuming most of you are in the states so hello from the philippines.
isacutie
Nov 15, 2007 at 4:45 am
oops, my comment is awaiting moderation…i wonder why.
irma
Nov 15, 2007 at 7:05 am
Sherry, later I will give you the recipe after work, just running late for work but I promised I will. Thanks for the updates of the Jolie-Pitt’s.
804
Nov 15, 2007 at 9:05 am
Sherry, here’s Angie’s A Year of Accountability
From The World in 2008 print edition
http://www.economist.com/theworldin/international/displayStory.cfm?story_id=10120144&d=2008
804
Nov 15, 2007 at 9:06 am
A Year of Accountability
From The World in 2008 print edition
http://www.economist.com/theworldin/international/displayStory.cfm?story_id=10120144&d=2008
Diana L
Nov 15, 2007 at 9:59 am
Did anyone else notice that all of Veteran’s Day weekend Angelina wore a red paper poppy pinned to her ? Those poppies used to be sold on every street corner for Veteran’s Day. I was impressed and moved that she wore one.
anamanzana
Nov 15, 2007 at 10:06 am
Yes, let’s ALL contemplate and ask for accountability - in this country as well as in the areas that she speaks of in the article. Here in this country we have CEOS and heads of state that also need to be held accountable. VOTE in 2008 for change!!!
Mary Ann
Nov 15, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Hi Irma, I also looked up pancit to see what it is. My husband was born in Puerto Rico and I make alot of their foods, even though I am not Puerto Rican I do pretty good. They make guisado with different types of meats and serve over rice. Your receipe would interest me also.
Mary Ann
Nov 15, 2007 at 1:11 pm
I would like to discuss this terrible rumor about Zahara. I heard it on the radio this morning again and this time it implied that Angelina knew that Zahara’s mother hadn’t signed any papers. I know that Brad and Angelina do not pay attention to the gossip magazines, but this they should pay attention to. If untrue this is damaging to their reputations and they should consult their attorney’s. They both do alot of important good works. I for one do not think that she would proceed with something knowing that it was not legal.
dragonfly
Nov 15, 2007 at 2:21 pm
On Souliejolie there is an article that came out today on Reuters from the adoption agency in Ethiopia that backs up Angie and Brad and says that the adoption was completely legal and irrevocable. It also says that the grandmother already testified at the time of the adoption and brought witnesses to concur that Zahara’s mother was deceased and her father was unknown. The adoption agency rep goes on to say that these magazines are despicable because they offered large sums of money to get people to say these things, and the mags are exploiting the poverty of others to make money.
Ambeach
Nov 15, 2007 at 2:38 pm
this was posted on JJ’s site:
In other news, Angelina Jolie’s adoption of daughter Zahara in July 2005 was completely legal, the agency involved said on Thursday.
Tabloids reported earlier this week that relatives of two-year-old Zahara, including a woman who says she is her birth mother, want the child returned to Ethiopia.
“The court in Addis Ababa approved the adoption after studying the document her grandmother wrote … saying her daughter, the mother of Zahara, had died and she was too poor to bring her up,” Tsegaye Berhe, the head of Wide Horizons for Children adoption agency told Reuters.
“The grandmother brought three witnesses to court who testified that Zahara’s mother had died and that her father was unknown … The court also investigated the social status of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt before approving the adoption. [The adoption was] legal and irrevocable. The controversy is media hype by unethical journalists exploiting the poverty of the grandmother.”
In other words, reporters paid the relatives to raise the dispute.
ligaya
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:22 pm
Don’t fret, Mary Ann. Tab rag In Touch published it, so you know what that means. Below is the reliable report.
ADOPTION LEGAL, TABLOID SHENANIGANS
Ethiopian adoption agency backs Angelina Jolie
Thu Nov 15, 12:40 PM ET
ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - Angelina Jolie’s adoption of an Ethiopian baby was legal, the agency involved said on Thursday, rejecting reports that the child’s relatives want her back.
Newspapers have reported this week that relatives of two-year-old Zahara, including a woman who says she is her birth mother, want the child returned to Ethiopia. Jolie adopted Zahara in July, 2005.
“The court in Addis Ababa approved the adoption after studying the document her grandmother wrote … saying her daughter, the mother of Zahara, had died and she was too poor to bring her up,” Tsegaye Berhe, the head of Wide Horizons for Children, which conducted the adoption, told Reuters.
“The grandmother brought three witnesses to court who testified that Zahara’s mother had died and that her father was unknown … The court also investigated the social status of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt before approving the adoption.”
Tsegaye said the adoption was “legal and irrevocable,” and he blamed reporters who he said had paid the relatives to raise the dispute.
“The controversy is media hype by unethical journalists exploiting the poverty of the grandmother,” he said.
(Reporting by Tsegaye Tadesse; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Michael Winfrey)
ligaya
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Don’t fret, Mary Ann. Tab rag In Touch published it, so you know what that means. Below is the reliable report.
ADOPTION LEGAL, TABLOID SHENANIGANS
Ethiopian adoption agency backs Angelina Jolie
(Reuters)
(The article is under moderation.)
Sophia
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:26 pm
I wonder what this rumour is all about. I saw the picture of the young girl that claims to be Zahara´s birth mother, and she looks JUST like Zahara, it´s incredible. So it seems that she really is her mother, but how can it be then that AJ always said that Zahara was an AIDS orphan? If she was told that, then she should really reconsider the agency she uses for adoptions. I´ve read before that the agency she used for adopting Maddox was fishy, and has since been closed down, and it seems this other agency isn´t much better. I remember that there was talk (a few years ago) that she might have to give Maddox back. Now it looks like it was another fishy adoption. I wonder why this is. It´s terrible for all involved. I agree that there is no way one should separate Zahara from her adoptive parents, that would be traumatic. Also, from what her alleged birth mother says, she doesn´t seem very fit to care for Zahara, and also I wonder whether she would love her, since she claims she was raped by Zahara´s father. So hopefully everything will work out well for the Jolie-Pitts, but I find it appalling that this whole adoption business does not seem to have been conducted in a completely legal way.
dianad1968
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:27 pm
maryann i tried posting a link to a story showing that the authorities and courts in Addis Ababa have called this story bogus- that the grandmother of zahara told them that her daughter had died, and that she brought three witnesses to attest to the fact. go to just jared to see the complete article. i was unable to post it here.
i understand your frustration at the relentless negative press given to angie, albiet all lies. this is especially now because of all the positive news re: possibly GG and Oscar nominations, and other accolades she has received recently. and dont forget there is a portion of the public that thrives on these kinds of story. somehow in their limited view, this is angie’s karma for being with brad at jen’s expense. you just have to read the poster named sunshine, who on another thread on pittwatch somehow saw that on the RC on sunday in london, brad was not happy, and angie was trying to get brad’s attention, and so was working the RC with everything she’s got. never mind various reports that claimed otherwise. what i am trying to say, is that these are the people that the tabloids cater to.
i however, have faith that GOOD ALWAYS TRIUMPHS OVER EVIL, and angie and brad will be vindicated.
ligaya
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Of course it was done in a completely legal way. Angelina would never do anything shady. (It was published by In Touch, for gosh sake - that’s a major clue right there.) I’ve posted the Reuters article in which the Ethiopian adoption agency backs Angelina completely. It’s under moderation. If you don’t want to wait, you can read the article - just google it.
Neela
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:34 pm
Sophia, JustJared just posted an update on the story. Sounds to me that everything was done legally. And as Jared mentioned, it seems that tab reporters paid some people to “raise the dispute.” Besides, the magazine is a tabloid. The story isn’t really worth a glance.
dianad1968
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:36 pm
sophia the resemlance could be because she is zahara’s aunt, and not her mother. why not read the REUTERS article that ligaya referenced above before jumping to conclusions.
Molly
Nov 15, 2007 at 3:37 pm
I just lost a post. Let me try and repost.
The yellow press is at it again. This time re Z’s adoption. It’s been debunked here: http://www.freeanonymizer.net/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2FmcmljYS5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS93aXJlL25ld3MvdXNuTDE1OTA0NTk3Lmh0bWw%3D
Credit Just Jared.
Fans, we should be used to these smear campaigns. Whenever our couple has something great happening, rags and trolls lose it and go into overdrive.
Let’s follow the JPs and simply ignore. Let’s instead celebrate and be ecstatic at all the great things happening in all facets of their lives.
linda
Nov 15, 2007 at 5:03 pm
To me Angelina is really a beautiful person outside and inside. True she was wild during her younger years, if you can say it was wild compare to what’s going today to some younger celebrities. At least she don’t run over people or crash other peoples car. She never hurt anyone on her wild days except herself and maybe her mom, due to worries.
Mary Ann
Nov 15, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Linda, I think you hit the nail on the head. I agree about Angie, she never hurt anyone. Some of these young stars just do not seem to learn by their mistakes. And I am so happy that this terrible rumor has been put to rest. No one Brad and Angie looked so stressed this weekend.
Mary Ann
Nov 15, 2007 at 5:18 pm
correction: No wonder Brad and Angie looked stressed this weekend.
Sophia
Nov 15, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Btw, what exactly are trolls? I am not a native speaker, and come across this term quite frequently on this site. Is this a particularly nasty person, or does it refer to someone who critisizes JP?
Lili May
Nov 15, 2007 at 7:17 pm
Thank you 804 for the link to the Economist and to Ligaya and other wonderful fans for posting the Reuters article. I just can not believe how low these rags can go! Sometimes I am inclined to believe there those who will stop at nothing to discredit Angelina and Brad. It is so unrelenting and vicious there must be a lot of money involved - paid to the rags to muck up/invent dirt. If the AMH and AOJJ are not nominated for the GG & the Oscars, you can almost believe that there is a conspiracy against them.
ligaya
Nov 16, 2007 at 10:47 am
These are just my first impressions from the 9:30 pm show – full house (there was also a midnight show). OH YEAH, definitely worth seeing in 3D, and the IMAX 3D is superlative. Does the movie/story work? A resounding yes. You don’t have to know the classic story, and if you do know it – it’s interesting to see the changes the scriptwriters made. The first half is a little slow because it’s setting up the last half – which is a more than satisfying payoff. The movie asks: what is a hero?, what is a monster?, what is human? It’s very moving. My highlights: sheet of water in the opening credits, the running joke early on, Grendel’s mom, the DRAGON. The final action sequence must be seen to be believed.
Angelina has limited visual screen time, as does John Malkovich, but she is present throughout the movie either with her voice or characters talking about her. And her character is as key to the story as Beowulf. At the first sight of Angelina emerging from the pool (a la Marlon Brando in Apocalypse now and many movies since), the 75% male audience were moaning and cheering. It was really quite funny. With every reveal from her face to her breasts to her pelvic area to her heels and finally to the whole digital Angelina, dripping in chocolate gold, the fanboys reacted. Her face is Shiseido perfection. Angelina’s performance was spot on, literally pitch perfect. Totally seductive, not evil, it’s her words as much as her appearance that mortal men find impossible to ignore. It’s their souls they willingly hand over as she exploits their weaknesses and becomes the agent of their downfall. (I thought that this must be what anti-Angelina [h-word] believe Angelina the person to be.)
Sir Anthony is magnificent as always, Ray Winstone heroic, and Crispin Glover as Grendel is as pitiful as he is monstrous. Brendan Gleeson, Beowulf’s second in command, gives a wonderful performance. Beowulf looks nothing like Ray Winstone, Grendel’s mom looks totally like Angelina, and we recognize Sir Anthony’s & Malkovich’s faces & voices but they have different bodies from their own, Robin Wright Penn & Alison Lohman look nothing like themselves.
Motion-capture and 3D: The 3D is incredible/magnificent. At first, it was like looking at those toy stereoscopes (can’t remember their names – senior moment). Then it became naturally 3D like our real world. The switch from 2D to 3D is going to be like the change from silent movies to talkies. The motion capture is about 80-90% there. Some of the characters are a little stiff and not realistic, others Like Angelina we could swear was real not digital, galloping horses need improvement.
I think are awards worthy: animation, stirring musical score.
ligaya
Nov 16, 2007 at 10:49 am
I just posted a review of Beowulf from yesterday’s 9:30 show. It’s under moderation.
Molly
Nov 16, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Wow ligaya, you lucky girl. Thanks for the beautifully written review. Roger Ebert gave it 3 stars and liked it as well.
Another award for AMH: http://www.winfemme.com/
Kudos to our fav couple.
Lili May
Nov 16, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Thank you Ligaya for the wonderful review of Beowulf! I can’t wait to see it but I have to wait until Sunday. I will be working this Saturday on a proposal and I don’t know what time I’ll get done. I wish there’s an Imax theater near my place.
Lucy
Nov 17, 2007 at 12:13 am
Thank you Ligaya for the review. My son who is 15 yrs., my husband and I will see it tomorrow at our IMAX here in Irvine. It sounds very enchanting. Beowulf is one of my son’s assigned reading in English as a sophomore now so I told him I can’t remember the premise because I read it in high school and that was a long, long time ago. I could hardly wait. Thanks for the post Sherry!
BlessBrangelina
Nov 17, 2007 at 12:23 am
Thanks Ligaya on all fronts.
Unfortunately as long as Brad and Angie remain happy and are moving forward regardless of the hatred poured their way, the “inventions” will continue. They need to sue at least one or two of these inventors to make them think twice.
Am very happy that People retracted their story (torn trousers), but its already flown across the world and TOO late. None of those who passed it on will retract their reports.
Lucy
Nov 17, 2007 at 11:09 pm
Okay folks. My family and I just saw this movie. The IMAX was packed and this movie was awesome. Ligaya, thank you for the review. Angie was the most powerful character even though her screen time was brief. I guarantee you will love this movie.
BlessBrangelina
Nov 17, 2007 at 11:40 pm
My husband and I saw the 445 show and I agree Angie was the cherry on a pretty impressive cake. Everyone was blown away by the effects. I can see why she felt shy about implied “nudity”, everyone else had odd camera angles and clothes to cover them up. She didn’t. She had given permission on good faith, I guess.
The screening room was full. Lots of couples and a few older movie goers, not so many teens. There was a couple of young guys next to us who proclaimed to the whole cinema; “That’s Brad Pitts wife!”, when she first appeared. LOL.
Loren
Nov 26, 2007 at 6:51 pm
Children First - Thank you for the video, I do miss their little faces (quite a bit truth be told, smile) I have seen your video a few times.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: