Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt at Beowulf London Premiere
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt were at Vue Cinema in Leicester Square, London for the London premiere of Beowulf on Sunday. Angelina looked stunning in a black shirt, sexy black leather pants, and awesome open-toe heels. I am also seriously loving her eye makeup, wow!
Brad Pitt looked great as well, in his trademark casual clothes and hat, and there were plenty of smiles for fans and cameras along the red carpet.
There are plenty more photos of Brad and Angelina at the Beowulf London premiere below the cut and they are gorgeous pictures!
(Source)
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Angelina Jolie, Angelina Jolie Pictures, Appearances, Brad Pitt, Brad Pitt Pictures, London, Movies
130 opinions for Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt at Beowulf London Premiere
Rach
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:02 pm
wow they both look amazing in these pics! Glad we’ve had quite a few to look at lately..always love seeing them together. Thanks!
Tixinhajolie
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:07 pm
so hot!!!!
they are so in love!!
AF
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:09 pm
No one else has posted these photos- great job!!. Brad looks a little tired, but overall they look good. What do they have pinned to their shirts?
Sherry
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:11 pm
AF - they’re both wearing poppies in honor of veterans who served in various wars. Today is Rememberance Day/Veteran’s Day.
just me
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:19 pm
Love,Love them…Looks like our Angie is under the weather..This is not her best look..Her nose is red..I hope she’s not sick or it could just be from the cold weather. Even though this is not her best in my opinion, she is still really gorgeous, so is Brad( a tad tanned..nice!!).
AF
Nov 11, 2007 at 3:29 pm
Thanks Sherry for the info re: the poppy..To Just Me - I agree this is not her best look, but she’s still beautiful. I wish she would just let her hair down more naturally, straight and long like Gwyneth Paltrow . She would look stunning, younger and less severe. Does anyone agree?
Bee
Nov 11, 2007 at 4:15 pm
Thanks for the info about the poppies, at first view I thought she is wearing something flowerish that the kids created ;D
They look both stunning and in love. I like the leather trouser Angi is wearing, it fits perfect to her and to the movie as well…
levnette
Nov 11, 2007 at 4:32 pm
oh well, i do not want to see her with hair like ms. paltrow circa ‘60.. no no!! this is fine.. not her best but it’s better than TGS premiere, right??
Cathy
Nov 11, 2007 at 4:48 pm
I saw them! I was there:-)They were BEAUTIFUL!!!
P.S. People in the UK have been wearing the poppies for the last two weeks and I found it soo cool that Brad and Angie joined in so quickly
koko
Nov 11, 2007 at 4:51 pm
she is too skin now! what going on .i liked her better when she has some weight on. she has everything to make her happy but why she is losing beauty everyday like that
Monet
Nov 11, 2007 at 5:09 pm
Is Angie sporting a baby bump in the last pic. Brad DOES have a great tan.
Jane
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:00 pm
Anyone else notice the gum on Angie’s left shoe heel? Opps! Angie is always beautiful and Brad is a delight to look at. :)
Lisa
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Canadians wear poppies too for Remembrance Day on Nov. 11th. I love both their outfits.
I Love Them
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Lately, Brad has this look when his picture is being take, like “Oh God!! I hate this. Oh, well, I’ll just stand here”. Does anyone else see that? Am I observing an angry father? He said “My two year old gets histerical”, and “I get worried when the paparazzi get in the kid’s faces” (or something like that).
fan
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:19 pm
thanks for the pics sherry-angie as always is a knockout-bradley isn’t looking to bad either.
quiet no more
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:29 pm
does she have a cold? or is it just chilly in london? cause her nose looks a bit pink
laura
Nov 11, 2007 at 6:45 pm
i am soo glad that brad looks like his gotten in some r and r time! he needs sleep sleep sleep…they both look like they left time for pampering and rest…..good move!
I adore these two!
And Brad is still (20yrs strong) the hottest male actor around…and the most multi-faceted actor and the best looking, sexiest, hunk of gorgeousness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bunga
Nov 11, 2007 at 7:55 pm
i aggre most with monet, doesn’t she pregnant? look at her boobs… if it’s true than would be # 5
maxie
Nov 11, 2007 at 8:20 pm
Maybe she has been crying.
Passerby
Nov 11, 2007 at 8:25 pm
Thanks Sherry!!
I’m proud to call them my favorite celebrity couple especially when they show their support for others in a public event like this premeire.
Angie does look tired in these pics but who can blame her living life the way she does.
I am so ready to stab Brad’s hat with a really sharp Knife. I really miss his hair. I wonder why he’s wearing the hat all the time now.
lori
Nov 11, 2007 at 8:44 pm
Brad’s coat is very nice, looks classy and stylish both to me. He dresses more like her in the colors she favors and he looks very nice in these pictures. I actually think they both do!
cee
Nov 11, 2007 at 8:48 pm
They look amazing as always and so much in Love. I am sure they are missing the kids even though they enjoy the alone time. Angie looks healthy and hot in that outfit.
boogaloobaby
Nov 11, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Molly — I posted a response to your reply to my post in the “Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie at Beowulf Premiere” board. In the event that you don’t go there again, here it is:
================================
Thanks for your kind words. I like what you have to say [in your reply], too.
When I was going through the past postings, I came upon photos of BP with his eldest boy, Maddox, as they were going to some “fun” kid place in New York City. There was a photo as they were descending the stairs. It was a long-shot, which captured the horde of papparazzi in front, beside, and in back of BP and his son. When I saw that photo, in my mind, I exclaimed, “WTF!!!”
It is a testament to their parenting skills that Maddox has learned to not react, build [what appears to me to be] an invisible wall that blocks them out. Nonetheless, that type of blatant invasion of their privacy and private-space is too much for a child, who did not ask to be a celebrity, to bear!
Yes, the photos of BP and AJ are absolutely lovely–the children are beautiful, well and appropriately dressed, well behaved; and the parents are expressively loving and caring towards them. But, if I never, ever see another photo of them, because the razzi, and the publications that pay them, has developed a sense of ethics, I would not mind in the slightest.
boogaloobaby
Nov 11, 2007 at 9:08 pm
Clarification: If I never, ever see photos of them AND their children in their private moments/family time.
I love the photos of AJ and BP at public, red-carpet events. Their children should be off-limits to the razzi’s lenses.
sofia
Nov 11, 2007 at 9:14 pm
go to just jared and there is like 3 pics of them kissing that is odd. They look hott
heaven
Nov 11, 2007 at 9:50 pm
http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/32197/
there’s also this lovely pic : http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/77847049.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193C1906FA8287CA61B40E19BF4FC4D48EF591E7EC1A351FC8B
a little closer… :) http://photo.wenn.com/index.php?action=preview&id=2680013&session_id=u9lqbngspfcqfcm9vuuunj3qe2
these are the 3 best pics ever…. hihihi every little pda they give each other in I absolutely love….
and sometimes, maybe the light may be playing tricks, but i do see the bump. hihihihi
Gracie
Nov 11, 2007 at 10:49 pm
umm, i went to justjared.com and didn’t find the kissing pictures. but I did see one kissing picture on wireimage.com. They were locking lips!!
naty
Nov 12, 2007 at 12:14 am
thaks sherry for the update, angie and brad really support each other although they look so tired, they are lovely. i love angie make up im so in love with her.
Deana
Nov 12, 2007 at 12:18 am
Damn! Billie has the bluest eyes! I know we’ve seen that black suit on him before, but it really does “suit” him. They all look Fabulous! I agree, my first thought was that Angie had been crying, but I know London weather can be a bit nippy and it is cold/flu season. Hope the kids are ok!
Cheers
Deana
ligaya
Nov 12, 2007 at 12:55 am
Thanks, Sherry. They’re absolutely beautiful - and they’re both wearing red poppies!
IMO, Angelina on her ugliest day would be miles ahead of me at my most beautiful best (after hours in the salon highlighting & styling my hair, getting my makeup done by a professional who does makeup for local fashion show models, mani & pedi, & new dress). I mean a day when she’s horribly sick from some kind of bug, with lanky/stringy/greasy hair, runny red nose, with spit-up and other kid-related stains on her clothes, broken fingernails, and ratty sweat top & pants. (Actually, I’d love to her in a movie looking like that.) It’s her genes & bone structure. She’ll grow old beautiful - like Lena Horne, Tina Turner, Gena Rowland, Vanessa Redgrave, Julie Christie, Sophia Loren, Jeanne Moreau, Catherine Deneuve. It’s her grace, self-confidence, and ease.
And of course, there’s her inner beauty radiating from within. Angelina won’t lose that even when she loses the perfection of her looks now and even when she gets old.
ligaya
Nov 12, 2007 at 1:45 am
Project Runway’s Tim Gunn has a column called “Style Tips.” He was asked “what celeb embodies fashion perfection?” Tim: “Angelina Jolie really understands how to navigate the world with style and grace. She exudes confidence and is always occasion-appropriate. She looks just as great picking up the kids at school as she does on the red carpet.”
Lucy
Nov 12, 2007 at 1:54 am
Although I don’t pay much attention to details when I look at their pictures because I know they are more beautiful inside than the way they look outside. Brad looks more serious and he probably wear the hat because it is a style for guys. Colin wears the same type hat all the time. Of course, Brad looks more handsome than Colin or the bodyguard. It’s his eyes, they are the most expressive pair. He looks serious here, bet he misses the kids.
Sophia
Nov 12, 2007 at 4:14 am
AF, I agree that she mostly looks very severe, and too wish for a younger, less conservative hairdo. (She looks beautiful with her hair short or shorter like in her new movie).
Is it my imagination or does Brad look fairly unhappy to acually be there? He looks unnerved. I guess they must have been freezing. It´s so cold in Europe; I cannot imagine wearing open-toe sandals and no coat.
I´m always amazed these people don´t catch a cold.
Jolie forever
Nov 12, 2007 at 4:52 am
ummmmmmm Sofhia and lucy¡¡Maniston what???
Angie the best..Te adore
Jolie forever
Nov 12, 2007 at 4:53 am
puff ok ok ok ok,see you forever
Maria
Nov 12, 2007 at 5:21 am
Sophia, it’s your imagination (your wish?) or you need glasses.
If he didn’t wont to be there, he would go. They go to each others premieres because they wont to be there and suport one onother.
Maria
Nov 12, 2007 at 5:26 am
koko
She is as skinny as she always been. Except during the filming of the 2 Tom Raiders when she went through a especial programe to gain some more muscular mass.
Rogue
Nov 12, 2007 at 7:42 am
HORRIBLE MAKE-UP
http://www.spymac.com/details/?2298811
anamanzana
Nov 12, 2007 at 9:17 am
I agree with the posters who are seeing “an unease” - this is not their best, but what a surprise to see them in London after such a busy time in L.A. for AJ. and Brad with kid duty…I remember when my kids were younger how I’d feel super self-conscious going to adult parties or events. It’s a huge shift, and I would go as far as to say that I had more fun and comfort with the kids than out with adults. It’s a long way to travel for a premiere, and I assume the JP’s are back in L.A. today. WHEW!
KC
Nov 12, 2007 at 10:01 am
The unease is because her pants split up the back! She is uncomfortable.
Mary Ann
Nov 12, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Star has a stupid story this week about Angie and the bodyguard. So this shows that story is a bunch of BS. As for her nose being red, Brad is tanned and maybe their house is on the beach in CA and she had sunburn on her nose. Where ever they are living I am glad the kids are having a little bit of privacy. Just think when we do see pictures of them they will all look so changed. Love Brad’s coat, really cool.
stephw5
Nov 12, 2007 at 3:59 pm
the news on AOL is that her pants ripped. and they were being so rude in their posts about her nose being red, saying that perhaps she was so skinny because she was snorting coke. i checked the weather in london yesterday and it would have been in the 30s last night and she has no coat on. it infuriates me how judgmental some people are! speculating about her lips (which i know are real!), her relationship, her motives for adopting from other countries, how she feels about her children in general, and WHY she does everything she does. even for all her money, perfect looks, and brad, i would not want to trade places with her!! being hypercriticized on a daily basis by a mob of nobodies would NOT be a lifestyle i desire! God bless ‘em!!!!
kit
Nov 12, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Brad says his cap is “to hide a very bad hair… it’s for a film I’m working on right now”, I think I also read somewhere that he had to have a streak in his hair for a role he was playing - could that be the film he’s working on now called “Burn after Reading”?
You can watch his interview with Diane Sawyer on - Brad Pitt Good Morning America, Part 1, 09-20-07 at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YpAmdrDlZI
where he also says “the thing I’m most happy about for my kids is that they have a mother like they do because she is amazing”.
I am so in love with this couple, their love for each other is so wonderful to see.
In Part 2, he talks about fatherhood and the passage of time, Part 2 also shows a clip in which Angelina describes him as “a great partner, a great man”.
lori
Nov 12, 2007 at 4:34 pm
I wonder why she would choose to wear a sheer top with no coat on when the weather was in the 30’s?
stephw5
Nov 12, 2007 at 5:24 pm
she is probably trying to dispel pregnancy rumors with the tight clothes and no coat. i also got to thinking… people are talking about her makeup or lack of… the last time i remember seeing her in tight, black leather pants was when she and BBT had a “ffest” (for lack of any other better way to put it!) in the back of their limo on the way to the mtv awards many years ago. perhaps brad got lucky on the way to Beuwolf!
dianad1968
Nov 12, 2007 at 7:36 pm
stephw5, i understand your frustration with the media reporting on angie. the good thing is, she says her and brad do not read or listen to any of those gossip magazines or television shows, so they are not affected. these people who thrive on these kinds of things, and who live and breathe hatred for this couple have very sad lives if you ask me. they cannot bear to see someone like angie, who by her own admissions, had some quite youthful indiscretions, and somehow have turned her life around for the better. added to that she is beautiful, and then has Brad, who unless you were blind, you can see is deeply in love with her. they would have preferred if she like britney, lindsay and such, had continued living her life like a car wreck, where everyday you were waiting to see when she was going to crash and burn. nevermind that at her worst, angie was never like the aformentioned starlettes. but she surprised them, and have turned out to be someone who can get an audience with people in power, and that galls them. she has shown them that it is not where you come from, but where you end up that matters.
by the way she gives the most awsome interviews. more power to angie and brad.
stephw5
Nov 12, 2007 at 8:34 pm
ooops! Beowulf.
Deana
Nov 12, 2007 at 10:49 pm
Stephw5!!! hehehehehehehehheehhehe
I loved the outfits that everyone was wearing, but I have too admit, it made her look likes shes lost weight again. Damn, to have her thin hips, Its hard to believe that woman has had a child. She loves her leather, and it loves her. The black leather dress she wore to the M&M Smith premiere was to die for! And I think every since that unruly fan grabbed Brad around the neck in Italy, he’s very weary of large crowds at the big premiers. He did say that one of his biggest fears is something happening to Angie.
Hugs to All!
Deana
GemStone
Nov 12, 2007 at 11:30 pm
I’m not loving these pics of these two. Usually, I love thier photo’s together but, I don’t think they flatter the twosome. But, I LOVE that they are both wearing poppies. As a member of the Armed Forces, love it!!!
tanya
Nov 13, 2007 at 1:45 am
Brad and Agelina look amazing as always love you guy’s. so what do you think JenniferAniston fanatic.did you agree that Angelina is stanning than jennifer. and i like the way Brad hands in the butt of Angie. Brad keep doing that only to Angie .
irma
Nov 13, 2007 at 8:04 am
Nothing can be compared to these two lovely couple, they always managed to look so beautiful on the red carpet. They are probably back to their home in L.A with their kids. God bless the Jolie-Pitt’s.
regina
Nov 13, 2007 at 8:21 am
thank U very much for stunning pics! U’ve done great job =)
and, by the way, thank U for everything U do it’s wonderful!
liliwaton
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:14 am
what a beautiful couple..classic look for angie and brad just looks great with his ensemble..lovely..lovely!!!
Peaches
Nov 13, 2007 at 9:49 am
I would have to say that AJ’s nose is probably a little pink as it has been very chilly the last few days here in the UK. I won’t go outside without a coat, hat, scarf and gloves so Angie is one brave lady! :)
Angefan
Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12 am
I think Ange looks hot ! She is coming around full force- HOT and Sexy. The looks that made her famous. Everyone that is posting that this is not her best look, needs to remember she is in freezing cold temperatures without a coat and trying to sign autographs, look nice for the camera, covering split pants and oh yeah- gum on the bottomn of her shoes. Are you kidding me? Wouldn’t we all wish we looked this pulled together under those circumstances?
She is so beautiful…. even in her skinny and no make-up days. When you blessed with her genes, not much can make you make you think
” not her best look”…..
That is all I want to say.
lori
Nov 13, 2007 at 1:08 pm
gena, you said, it is odd for me to comment on her not wearing a coat and a sheer top in 30 degree weather? That is odd? Maybe some people do prefer cold over warm weather, maybe you are right, I have never read before where she did that, so I guess I missed that article.
lori
Nov 13, 2007 at 1:09 pm
I do love Brad’s coat! I would love to buy my son a coat like that.
ligaya
Nov 13, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Angelina’s OB-GYN, who presided over Shiloh’s birth by c-section - capably assisted by the local staff - said after the birth that the c-section was necessary because Shiloh was in breech position. If I remember right, the breech position is the most common reason for c-sections.
Laurie
Nov 13, 2007 at 3:27 pm
Angie looked “stunning” and Brad looked “great as well”??
You should just change the name of this blog to joliewatch.com.
Enough Angelina; more Brad!
dianad1968
Nov 13, 2007 at 5:12 pm
ligaya, you are right about the reason for the c-section. shiloh was breech. i remember at the time all the hateful people were saying nasty things about angie, and that the reason she did not have a natural birth was because angie had a STD. my god when i remember these things, cannot help being amazed at the absolute amount of hatred there is in the world today. and especially women against each other. all because she is a beautiful accomplished woman.
dianad1968
Nov 13, 2007 at 5:42 pm
sherry, i hope i am not in violation of the rules of the board, because i posted yesterday, and my comment is still awaiting moderation. also one from today.
i appreciate all the hard work you do to keep us abreast of all the latest jolie-pitt family news, and would hate to think i am doing something to upset you.
thank you.
lori
Nov 13, 2007 at 7:28 pm
BlessBrangelina, I saw that, and also saw the gentlemen holding her coat for her, but I would assume the Red Carpet walk was longer than 5 minutes? At least they are here in the U.S. So I still think it must have been cold in the 30’s, especially with a sheer top on! Didn’t see Brad taking his coat off!
lori
Nov 13, 2007 at 7:34 pm
I have looked at several websites to see how the theme goes and what demeanor they are. This is the only site I have observed where the Webmistress “tackles” anyone’s opinions as Brangelina stated. It is unusual, and does appear that Sherry takes some comments personal instead of professional.
I have looked at a site called Babyrazzi also that was brought to my attention, not often for I think it is usually about celebs with children, don’t know for sure, but I have never seen where the Webmistress has commented. Of course I have only looked at it for about 3 weeks now.
ligaya
Nov 13, 2007 at 7:53 pm
lori, you don’t read my posts so you won’t see this :-) . You’re full of b.s. Is this what you mean by respecting Sherry? Sherry unprofessional? Puh-leeze. Sherry is the most objective, non-personalizing mod/admin. I know. She’ll have her own opinion, and she’ll say when she agrees/disagrees - that’s not the same as taking “some comments personal instead of professional.”
Sherry
Nov 13, 2007 at 8:04 pm
Lori, then you clearly haven’t looked around this very network. The network that houses this blog, b5media, fully encourages us to interact. I can’t answer every single comment because there are far too many, I have other blogs to tend to, and I have family duties, but I do try to pop in regularly. In fact, I recently stated on the blog that I was hoping to interact more here.
Many, MANY of us on b5media interact with our readers. It’s part of what makes it fun. I’m not a journalist, part of blogging is to create a sense of community which is exactly why I’m making a bigger effort to respond when something urges me to. I do it on my own personal blog so of course I would do it here. Otherwise this just becomes another news site and there may as well be no comments at all.
Sherry
Nov 13, 2007 at 8:05 pm
And also, after reading that over, I have to say that when my network encourages me to interact in the comments, it would actually be unprofessional of me to NOT respond in the comments.
Sherry
Nov 13, 2007 at 8:16 pm
dianad, no not at all! Sometimes certain key words make a comment flagged for auto moderation and I have to go manually approve them (or delete the ones that are actually spam messages trying to sell things). I just had a really busy couple of days so I only got to them this evening, sorry for the delay!
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 3:31 am
Sherry, you are doing a great job maintaining this site. I’m sure many of us appreciate that you are able to share your opinions just like the rest of us. You don’t have to defend yourself just for posting your opinion; you are just doing what many of us are doing here. I am a tad annoyed that others think you have to censor yourself because you are the one running this website and a few other sites while still tending to your family obligations. It isn’t like you are running a professional online publication. It’s just a blog :), and your blog at that, and hence, go ahead and address and reply to any comment. :)
I assure you that most us of do not think you have crossed any “unprofessional” boundaries. In fact, I and many others like it that we are able to interact with you in a more personable manner :)
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 3:33 am
Sherry, you are doing a great job maintaining this site. I’m sure many of us appreciate that you are able to share your opinions just like the rest of us. You don’t have to defend yourself just for posting your opinion; you are just doing what many of us are doing here. It is a bit sad that others seem to think you have to censor yourself because you are the one running this website. It isn’t like you are running a professional online publication. It’s just a blog :), and your blog at that, and hence, go ahead and address and reply to any comment. :)
I assure you that most us of do not think you have crossed any “unprofessional” boundaries. In fact, I and many others like it that we are able to interact with you in a more personable manner :)
sunshine
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:21 am
They look nice in those pictures, but it looks as if Angelina has been crying in those pictures. There are other photos on the WENN, site where clearly she does not look happy. What really surprised me more than anything is that Brad is without his ring. he always wear that ring on the right ringfinger. not only that, The previous premiere he had the anti-ring on. You know the one, nothing is set in stone. I am sorry, but I think there is something going on here, that will call for an announcement in the next couple of weeks. I do not think it will be in favor of Angelina. This is only my opinion, but I think she was very sad on this night.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:26 am
Care to bet on that sunshine? :)
Seriously, why overanalyze a bunch of pics. Not attacking you, but that was some stretch of an analysis.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:28 am
Also, England’s known for their very cool and somewhat cloudy/damp weather. I think it’s safer to assume that she was cold that night.
sunshine
Nov 14, 2007 at 11:32 am
Well, Neela, I am not a betting or gambling type of person. However, I don’t think it is a gamble on sure bets, so yes, I would be delighted to take that bet. I must say, I am not crticizing, but I think there are way too many signs to disregard. Go over to the WENN site and look at all the pictures, and then we can talk. The weather may be cool, damp, and cloudy, so why would a person take off their coat if they were cold?
stephw5
Nov 14, 2007 at 12:47 pm
sherry, what you SAID didnt offend me. it was the people who felt the need to “protect” you from me that seemed so silly. but no worries. im gone. the only reason i saw all of this was because of the emails. i am going to cancel that. life’s too short to argue about such silly things!
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:33 pm
sunshine, why did angelina take off her coat? maybe because she wanted to show off her outfit??? that’s one possibility. perhaps she also got a bit stuffy wearing it. i tend to do the same thing on cold weathers. look, it is still too much of a stretch to assume any “trouble” is brewing between brad and angie. if you’re talking about the rings as signs, well, they may have sentimental value, but at the same time, they are also just accessories. if actions speak louder than words and if you want to consider signs, then, look over the most recent pics from the premieres in london and la. if there were any trouble between brad and angie, then, i don’t think they would be as close and as affectionate as they were on both nights. also, i doubt they would have been all good smiles, not to mention, brad probably would have been a no-show if they were having problems. they probably wouldn’t have even gone out to dinner before the london premier. lainey, from laineygossip, just posted a recent blog/article on one of the premieres (i believe the london one), and she cites the palpability of pitt porn that night. don’t take this wrong way, and i’m sorry if i do insult you, but your assessment sounds like it came from life & style or star magazine. just remember, that these are just pics. we’re barely scratching the surface as we look at their pics on the internet. we don’t really know anything about them.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:34 pm
sunshine, why did angelina take off her coat? well, maybe because she wanted to show off her outfit??? that’s one possibility. perhaps she also got a bit stuffy wearing it. i tend to do the same thing on cold weathers. look, it is still too much of a stretch to assume any “trouble” is brewing between brad and angie. if you’re talking about the rings as signs, well, they may have sentimental value, but at the same time, they are also just accessories. if actions speak louder than words and if you want to consider signs, then, look over the most recent pics from the premieres in london and la. if there were any trouble between brad and angie, then, i don’t think they would be as close and as affectionate as they were on both nights. also, i doubt they would have been all good smiles, not to mention, brad probably would have been a no-show if they were having problems. they probably wouldn’t have even gone out to dinner before the london premier. lainey, from laineygossip, just posted a recent blog/article on one of the premieres (i believe the london one), and she cites the palpability of pitt porn that night. don’t take this wrong way, and i’m sorry if i do insult you, but your assessment sounds like it came from life & style or star magazine. just remember, that these are just pics. we’re barely scratching the surface as we look at their pics on the internet. we don’t really know anything about them.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:34 pm
sunshine, why did angelina take off her coat? well, maybe because she wanted to show off her outfit??? that’s one possibility. perhaps she also got a bit stuffy wearing it. i tend to do the same thing on cold weathers; sometimes, i get too warm under my coat, especially when i’m bustling about. look, it is still too much of a stretch to assume any “trouble” is brewing between brad and angie. if you’re talking about the rings as signs, well, they may have sentimental value, but at the same time, they are also just accessories. if actions speak louder than words and if you want to consider signs, then, look over the most recent pics from the premieres in london and la. if there were any trouble between brad and angie, then, i don’t think they would be as close and as affectionate as they were on both nights. also, i doubt they would have been all good smiles, not to mention, brad probably would have been a no-show if they were having problems. they probably wouldn’t have even gone out to dinner before the london premier. lainey, from laineygossip, just posted a recent blog/article on one of the premieres (i believe the london one), and she cites the palpability of pitt porn that night. don’t take this wrong way, and i’m sorry if i do insult you, but your assessment sounds like it came from life & style or star magazine. just remember, that these are just pics. we’re barely scratching the surface as we look at their pics on the internet. we don’t really know anything about them.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:37 pm
Oops, Sherry, you may want to delete 2 of my triple posts. I guess I hit the submit button one too many times. My Internet’s running slow .. .
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 2:45 pm
Sorry for the triple posts. I think I became too happy with the submit button. My internet’s slow.
By the way, Sunshine, since we don’t know anything that goes on in the JP’s personal life, we can also assume that Angie may have been teary over something that’s totally unrelated to her domestic partnership. Perhaps it’s something related to her work as a humanitarian. Who really knows.
Anyway, I hope I didn’t offend you any. Your assessment was just interesting to read.
sunshine
Nov 14, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Neela, no offense taken. I was not sure of what you were talking about with the magazines, but I pulled it up. I guess I was not the only person that noticed how Angelina looked. For the record, I did not see that article before I submitted my post. I bases my assessment on some men are creatures of habit, and when you look at the photos of Brad that seems to stand out quit a bit about the rings. Now, if you go through, even this site, and look at that ring finger, you very seldom see him without the ring. If you looked at the pictures for the dinner, Angelina looked extremely unhappy in that one, moreso than at the premiere. It kind of remind me of how she was hugging on BBT, and kissing all over him in front of the cameras, and a few months later she stated they were getting a divorce. It just seems as if she is very sad and appears to be over compensating on the red carpet and he do not appear to respond in the same fashion. Look at her pictures there is so much sadness in her eyes, and that did not come from the tabloids.
They are under a great deal of stress. Relationships are hard for anyone, but when you are torn apart for every little thread, every little sentence, and every little hair out of place, it will take its toll. I think that it is just too much for anyone, and I think they will soon give an announcement. Don’t forget about the beach scene with Brad and Jen, when they were just on vacation, Jen was crying and the next thing you knew, here comes the announcement.
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 4:40 pm
It’s all good, Sunshine.
I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. I’m choosing to be optimistic, especially considering I am just a spectator. I’m sure just like any other couple they do have their rough patches, but at this point, I think it’s still a safer bet to say that these two are harmonious and happy to be together. I do have to say that I don’t think Angelina is overcompensating. In the LA premiere pics alone, it was Brad who was also all over her. And by all accounts of fans who had attended the premiere, the two are very much in love.
Clearly, you and I are viewing the pics much differently. And I have to say, I am not overanalyzing them. I’m sure some share your views over the pictures, but I know many also share mine. Your assessment or the way you have dissected the pics may not have come from a tabloid, but hehe, no offense, and again I apologize if this comes off as an insult, but I think InTouch would love to have you on their writing staff. Teehee. Sorry.
In these instances, I think we should just wish them the best and not look into the negative side of things. Unless of course you are rooting for a demise in the partnership, then, I think I can understand why you are making these assessments.
Besides, who are we really to judge? No matter how much we insist on our views and how much we presume and analyze, it’s not going to change the fact that we don’t know anything about them. I, for one, will only believe anything about their relationship if they themselves mention something about it. Again, I think we should just wish them the best. It’s been some time now since Brad’s divorce, and Brad and Angie now have a brood, and so, we should wish success for their family. :)
Neela
Nov 14, 2007 at 4:43 pm
And I also have to add that Angie and Jennifer are two different people with distinct personalities. So, it’s not really fair to compare the two relationships.
sunshine
Nov 14, 2007 at 5:24 pm
I agree with you 100%, to agree to disagree. However, much respect here for you and your opinion. I do believe in wishing people the best, and because the beginning started with such great promise, I truly hope it work out for them. My comparison with Jennifer, was not about them being alike, it was the fact that you mentioned, or someone mentioned why would they be smiling on the red carpet. Basically, I was saying the same scenario took place with them and when you thought things were getting better it ended. With all that being said, I respect your feedback. However, once again, I am not offended at all. I am a psych nurse, so I have a tendency to look at the behavior of people and not just the words that come out of their mouth. As for the magazine, I could only make it better, because most of them are crazy and will say anything and everything with intent to hurt, and that is something I would never do. Peace.
ligaya
Nov 14, 2007 at 6:08 pm
“The weather may be cool, damp, and cloudy, so why would a person take off their coat if they were cold?”
Sunshine, maybe you missed my post on the Brad Maneuver thread:
“I doubt that stars & models are under contractual obligation to dress skimpily in cold weather. But this is one of those things stars have to do - freeze in the cold so the photogs can get great pictures. As a veteran red carpet watcher for decades, I haven’t seen too many or maybe even any bundled up stars. We all want those great pics of their lovely gowns, jewelry, purses, shoes, etc. I don’t think the designers who lend the gowns, jewelry & accessories would be happy if the public couldn’t see them.
So the stars all suffer in the cold weather. They’ve mentioned being frozen and RC interviewers sometimes mention it too.”
Janie said in the same thread: “As far as why she did not bundle up, I am sure Versace wanted those pants to be seen and photographed, like was said above. “
dianad1968
Nov 14, 2007 at 6:16 pm
sunshine, re: your angie and bbt reference, she left him because of maddox. his actions after the adoption was not what angie expected from a father. she has said that she did not think he was invested in being a father to maddox.
angie and jen are two different people. if angie was unhappy with brad, you can bet your last dollar she would not be on a RC pretending otherwise. that is not angie’s MO. somehow you really seem to want an annoucement of a break-up. sorry, you are too transparent.
sunshine
Nov 15, 2007 at 8:18 am
Oh, dianad1968, I beg to differ. Take a better look at those pictures and I think they tell a whole different story than the Angelina that you are describing. It looks to me of a woman that may possibly be losing a relationship and not quite ready to let go. It look like for the first time in quite sometime Brad is regaining his life and that may be with or without Angelina. She seems to have a total different agenda on that red carpet, and that is trying to get Brad’s undivided attentions, and she gets a peck on the cheek. I am only giving my opinion, and I like what Neela say about agreeing to disagree. It’s all love baby, Peace.
ligaya
Nov 15, 2007 at 2:50 pm
About agreeing to disagree, I think of it as an exchange of opinions/information, and when it’s been discussed enough, both respecting the other person’s right to their own opinion. Somehow, to me, that doesn’t include ending it with ‘by the way your opinion sucks’ although probably not in those words, at least not on this blog. It’s WHAT a person says AND HOW she says it. The respect has to be there, usually with a little give.
Also, agreeing to disagree doesn’t mean, IMO, that all positions/opinion are equally right. There’s a continuum from “completely false” to “completely true” to a mix of both truth/false in between.
dianad1968
Nov 15, 2007 at 5:04 pm
i did not realise brad had lost his life, and has just now located it. will the speculations ever end about this couple’s life together? when they are serious, then they are not in love. if they smile and are loving, it’s all for PR, or in this instance angie realises she is losing brad, and is hanging on for dear life. never mind that there is documented proof that brad has called angie his love and that she is the nucleus of his family. it is sad and pathetic.
Molly
Nov 16, 2007 at 12:07 pm
dianad1968, another day, another alter ego! ^^ They can’t be paying too well at HQ, so completely out of their league. : )
Stefie
Nov 16, 2007 at 6:21 pm
It’s amazes me every time I see these two together: they are just so perfectly beautiful together. It is like heaven made them for each other. They are made for each other. LOVE JP
Stefie
Nov 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm
In response to Diana1968 comments:
No one knows what Brad went through. But having a family and children of my own and coming of age myself, I know that money and fame can only carry so far. Then, you look at the final analysis and know what matters most: family, children, love, happiness, contentment.
lis
Nov 17, 2007 at 1:59 am
hmm, seems to me that sunshine just doesn’t like angelina. i guess if you are biased against a person to begin with then, you will only see what you want (or don’t want to see), and it is obvious that sunshine only wants to see failure in an otherwise healthy relationship. it also doesn’t matter if you’re a psych nurse, sunshine. you are still a human being. you are prone to mistakes, judgments, misinformation, and prejudice. and like others have said, you are looking at pictures. you did not observe them first hand at the event.
sunshine
Nov 19, 2007 at 2:58 pm
lis, you are so right, i believe we all are looking at pictures. Now, far be it for me to disagree with anyone, but when you look at the Wenn picture website it shows Angelina acting a little more insecure than the pictures that are displayed here. Also, thank you for knowing that I am human, meaning that I am entitled to my interpretation of these pictures like everyone else. I must say these pictures do not look like a happy Angelina, and Brad, who always wears a ring seems to be about to call it a rap on this relationship. But, he is a grown man, he is entitled to do what he want just like the rest of us. I would just like to say happy Holidays to you all, wishing you a very blessed and happy Thanksgiving. Peace.
Sherry
Nov 19, 2007 at 3:07 pm
The reason I hate when people analyze a relationship based on pictures is that it’s one moment in an entire lifetime of moments. There could be any reason for the things you mentioned.
-maybe Angelina was reminded of something sad, something about her mother or missed her kids, or any other non-relationship issue that made her look mildly unhappy in certain shots.
-maybe she was just really bloody cold and wishing she was at home in pajama pants and a sweatshirt.
-maybe Brad takes his ring off before showering and they were running late and he forgot to put it back on. I take mine off when I’m baking biscuits or making meatloaf/meatballs because it gets all gross otherwise. Sometimes I forget to put it back on for two days and I’d hate to think people around me automatically assume there’s trouble in my relationship just because my ring is off.
And finally, you know what? They’re human. Maybe they did indeed have a rip-roaring argument on their way over. Maybe they were really upset with each other and then had to smile for cameras while still stewing at each other. So what? It drives nuts when people think a celebrity relationship is about to fall apart because of a fight. My husband and I argue about all kinds of things. We’ve fought in the car, I’ve cried, and then we’ve walked into a party and we’re all smiles even though we’re ticked off at each other. And then later we apologize, and we make up.
Why do so many people think that arguing means a relationship is finished? People who think that way must have some awfully perfect relationships.
/soapbox
:)
Neela
Nov 19, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Oh my god, Sherry. You’ve made the best points! Dang. I really couldn’t agree with you more. I hope your words will get people thinking first before jumping to conclusions.
Neela
Nov 19, 2007 at 11:26 pm
Actually, I’d just like to add that it is a tad annoying that Angelina is the one being picked on again. Once again, she is the one being painted as “the insecure” one. Oy vey. Time and again, this woman has proven that she is fierce and has confidence, with or without a partner. Although it is just one person’s opinion, it is still ridiculous to be dissecting these pictures to bits.
sunshine
Nov 20, 2007 at 12:23 pm
If I offended anyone on this site, I truly apologize because that was not my intention. I see things a little differently, and feel as though Brad is no longer with Angelina. Also, I think there is some truth to him and Jennifer.
Lis
Nov 20, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Ah, sunshine, your last post explains it all. You’re still hung up on that old tandem, so you do only see what you want to see. Sorry pal, time to get with the times. Everybody else has moved on, and Brad and Ange have dispelled any negative rumors or views about them so many times. You may still be in denial but Brad is clearly in love with Angie. Not only has he proclaimed that love in recent interviews, he has shown it many times on the red carpet. You’re just grasping at straws now, and will buy any story a 99 cent tabloid will tell you. And it seems to me that you’re just trying to stir something here. Sad. Just sad.
Chae
Nov 20, 2007 at 4:24 pm
*cough* sunshine=delusional *cough*
Chae
Nov 20, 2007 at 4:37 pm
LOL. Look at Brad “no longer” with Angie. http://www.souliejolie.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=24919&st=100
His arms wrapped around her and his face beaming at her are sure signs that he is “not” in love with her anymore. Unbelievable. Oh wait, those are displays of deep esteem and love for one another.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 1:52 am
Time will tell. But, no need to be mean about difference in opinions. I saw a tearful Angelina on the red carpet, and when you watch the video on youtube it is even more clear that he is just not into her, No pun intended. Since then, have you seen any pictures or sightings of the two of them? Now, believe it or not, I am not hung up in the past, I just look at the behavior. Now, Brad’s behavior shows someone that is losing interest in this relationship. You can listen to his words, but his actions say anything but I am so into this relationship.
If you go through a couple of pictures here on this thread, go back to the boat ride, for goodness sakes, he totally ignores his own baby, but once again that is just my opinion. That made it very clear to me that he is no longer emotionally attached to Angie or the kids. Before you start to jump on me, just take a look at the boat ride in Chicago.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 2:25 am
Here is the video, as he pretty much spend 2.5 seconds on the carpet with her, before pushing away from her. This is just my opinion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPaa9yvPVJc&feature=related
I saw this picture here. This is not the past, this was very recent and he ignores his baby and Angelina.
http://www.pittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jolie-pitt-family-boating-6.jpg
http://www.pittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jolie-pitt-family-boating-10.jpg
http://www.pittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jolie-pitt-family-boating-14.jpg
http://www.pittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jolie-pitt-family-boating-13.jpg
When he gets off the boat, there is a sudden interest in his daughter.
http://www.pittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jolie-pitt-family-boating-15.jpg
Now, believe it or not, in the beginning I was their biggest fan. Then I started noticing that maybe he is not treating Angelina no better than he treated Jen. As a woman that survived this type of behavior, it is just unacceptable to me. And, do not think Angelina should settle for this. This woman is not happy, no matter how you spin it.
Now, is there anyone here that can separate the fantasy of them, and see the reality of a woman that just do not seem happy with Brad. Now, without any personal attacks, or calling me names, tell me you do not see that there are problems here.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 3:18 am
Why do you erase my post that clearly proved my point. I guess reality has no place on this site, only fantasies because fans can not handle what about 80% of the nation already knows. If you erase my post for telling the truth then, why show the pictures of Brad ignoring his only biological daughter. This also came on the publication of Jennifer Hawaii pictures. Now, call my bluff if I am wrong, and put the post back.
Sherry
Nov 26, 2007 at 7:25 am
Sunshine - Moderation of a comment doesn’t mean it was deleted. You included a ton of links, the system automatically moderates it because people who post spam or porn also post a bunch of links. It’s not me being unfair to you, it’s automatic, it’s how filters work to protect people from comments that are all about porn or where to buy free pharmaceuticals.
And it’s still under moderation because it’s only 8:20 am in my time zone and I’ve been busy preparing my daughter for school.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 8:46 am
Sunshine, grow up.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:02 am
Sunshine, you are going to great lengths to prove your opinion is the right one. You said it is only an opinion. Just leave at that. It doesn’t make it right. It doesn’t make it wrong. And no matter how much of those links you post won’t change our minds. Just wish this family’s success and strength, instead of anointing yourself a clairvoyant. Stop buying into the tabloid’s delusions. You trying to prove your point to this extent is making you all the more ridiculous and intolerant of others’ views, NOT TRUTHFUL. Stop shoving it down our throats. We get it, you think they are not happy. Get this, we believe they are. You keep insisting on tolerance of a difference of opinion, and yet, you persist that “what you see” is infallible. You’re only doing this because you can’t accept it that almost every person that has replied to you doesn’t agree with you. NEWSFLASH: this is a JP fan site.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:14 am
Sunshine, if you want somebody to agree with you, visit an anti-JP site. You can share 99% of your delusions there with the rest of the haters who hold the tabloids their bible.
ligaya
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:31 am
What are you doing here, Sunshine? Are you on a mission to convince us that Angelina & Brad are a train wreck? IMO, your goal is to hijack this fansite to discuss your obsession – which I think is very bad and disrespectful of you. This reminds me of the Christian (not that there’s anything inherently wrong with Christianity or any other religion) missionaries and their destructive effects on indigenous Hawaaians and their culture in the 1800s. This practice continues today – with the assumption that one’s beliefs are inherently superior to others’ beliefs.
IMO, pittwatch is not the place to work out your issues about being abandoned. Will it help you to know that almost everyone (I’d say everyone but I have to allow for the possibility) has experienced being left by a partner? Or friend, parent, mentor? In life and in death?
Having worked in the mental health field for quite some time, my opinion is that you need to do some counseling work (some are free) and move on from having been treated badly. I don’t know how old you are, 18 or 80, but whatever age, what a waste of your life to wallow in the past. One of the great things about sharing your issues with others is getting a sense of perspective – exactly how bad you are off compared to others. I’ve been in counseling myself (as most mental health workers do) and it really helped me improve my life.
It’s easy to choose clips that seem to show one thing, but really are not. Remember the Cannes RC pictures? It was so obvious that Brad & Angelina were hot for each other. But the Angelina 8ers posted pics/clips that purportedly showed Brad pushing Angie away from kissing him. Lately, the fad is to say Angelina & Brad look like wax figures on the RC. Yeah, they do in a few shots. But I’ve seen the complete videos and other pics which show how animated & in love they are. Pictures aren’t always true, specially if they’ve been carfefully chosen with a specific goal (i.e., show they’re breaking up), edited, cropped, photoshopped, and put in a misleading context.
ligaya
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:38 am
80% of the nation knows? Your reputable, reliable sources please (that means no tabloid mags, tv shows, blogs, gossip columns, etc.) Reliable sources mean AP, Reuters, BBC, Wall Street Journal, NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, Readers’ Digest, Vanity Fair, Vogue, W, Glamour/Allure, Elle, Essence, O, Mademoiselle, Keith Olbermann, Daily Show, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, & Alternet.
Pictures aren’t always true, specially if they’ve been carfefully chosen with a specific goal (i.e., show they’re breaking up), edited, cropped, photoshopped, and put in a misleading context.
It’s easy to choose clips that seem to show one thing, but really are not. Remember the Cannes RC pictures? It was so obvious that Brad & Angelina were hot for each other. But the Angelina 8ers posted pics/clips that purportedly showed Brad pushing Angie away from kissing him.
Lately, the fad is to say Angelina & Brad look like wax figures on the RC. Yeah, they do in a few shots. But I’ve seen the complete videos and other pics which show how animated & in love they are.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:49 am
With Sunshine, her main point is to show that she is correct. Rather than accepting and wishing Brad and Angie and their brood are thriving, she cares more that she is proven right, that her discriminating eyes know better than the Pitts themselves or the people who actually know them.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:51 am
Chae, I was just stating why I came to this opinion, due to the fact that I was called delusional. I am being told to grow up, which, it is only on this thread that I am met with such opposition, because I am never arrogant or trying to put anyone down just to make a point, and yet, I can not say the same thing about others. I think it is just not that serious, and I will leave you all to your discussion. I do believe that you should just note that the only post accepted here are those that only have one point of view. Well, I wish you and yours a very safe and blessed upcoming Holiday season. Peace Ladies.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 9:56 am
Sunshine, you are so wrong. Many “disagreeable” and anti-JP posts have been put up here. I’ve read so many of them, with some of them, just down right nasty, and they still exist. Read Sherry’s post up there, and you will see that many of the posts await moderation. That has happened to me just now. Sherry’s just one person running this site for crying out loud. And please do leave us to our discussion. We’ve had enough of your “views.”
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 10:16 am
You get no argument from me Chae, PEACE.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 12:59 pm
OK, I said I would leave it alone, but I have to touch on this. Ligaya, if you truly work in the mental health industry, you would see that what you posted goes against most dynamics of mental health. You truly should practice what you preach. I’m in the same field that you proclaim to be in. You attack me, and you know absolutely nothing about me. You are defending the honor of people that you do not even know, never have known, and quite frankliy will never know. If you are to be believed about the more responsible newspapers, then I am dead on, because NY Times has been very critical of her, as well as The Washington Post. Remember the Fall From Grace article, the article ripped Angelina to shreds. The Washington Post, also had a few choice words for her. Now, I believe it is you getting info from tabloids. The tabloids continue to keep them together, when I truly believe they are not together.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/movies/22back.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I will end on this note. You attack me and do not know anything about me. You attempt to give me advice about counseling based on a couple of posts. You defend someone you do not know and I am the obssessed one, go figure. What you did not attack or dispute was the pictures of Brad ignoring his baby and Angelina appearing upset about this. I did not choose these pictures Pittwatch did. I just used them as a point of reference. BTW, I have worked in some of the most nationally recognized hospitals in the country, Johns Hopkins, and ST. Elizabeth Hospital. Yet, this makes my opinion no better than yours, and yours no better than mine,PEACE.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 1:25 pm
Sunshine, I know you’re responding to Ligaya, but your post is just too laughable to not respond to. For one thing, you are accusing Ligaya of being judgmental towards you when you yourself are being judgmental towards the Pitts, people that you don’t know either. You accuse the fans and Ligaya of defending the Pitts when we don’t know them and yet you criticize them when you don’t know them either. Aren’t you just a pot calling the kettle black???
The “Fall from Grace” article was written around the time when Angie had lost her mum. Go figure there. That article was proven moot when one week later everybody found out that Angie’s mum had been in the hospital for some time and had just died, hence, her so-called glum appearance at the Golden Globes Red Carpet. The article just nitpicked at Angie because of that appearance and because she referred to Shiloh as a blob, when it was the interviewer who actually offered that word. And guess what, that article is clearly worthless seeing as Angelina has not fallen from grace. She has just been named as one of EW’s top entertainers of the year. She has just penned a praise worthy article for the Economist. Her movie career is blooming. Boewulf is a success, and she gets to work with some respectable actors/directors in the biz. And guess what, she is still with her family.
And you must be living in a skewed world because week after week, the tabs have Angie and Brad breaking. Give us a break. Shall we have a rundown of the tab headlines on the JP’s this month? How about in the past 2 months or the past year? The negative headlines far outweigh the positive ones. Even US Weekly called on its fellow tabs for its contradicting negative headlines against the JPs.
You really need to stop it. This is the Internet, and anyone who dips in it can expect to be judged. It is unfair, but that is the reality. And when you are posting negative opinions against the Pitts on a fan site, then, expect retaliation from the fans.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Chae, you truly seemed to be clued up on all the gossip about the two of them, but with that aside thanks for the reality of internet blogging. You tell me that I should not pay attention to the tabloids, now you want to run down to me what they say, make up your mind baby. But, trust, I am not that easily offended and I am truly not affected when I am criticized from people that know nothing about me. I have better sense than that. Trust me baby, I can handle the responses because they are just words, you know, letters of the alphabet, It is laughable when people get so upset, you would think that I was writing about their personal family or something. It is not that serious honey. Peace, Babe.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 3:54 pm
Oh dear, Sunshine. You do seem to get offended. Actually, you’re badly affected. You can’t take it that people don’t agree with you. You keep coming on here insisting on your opinions. You have said peace multiple times, and yet, here you are. You’re coming apart now because you can’t keep the patronizing tone off your post. I only referred to the tabloids only because you referred to them. If you are going to support your arguments, at least try to make them solid, instead of being punctured with holes, such as your biased “sight” and ill sources.
Oh, and you’re welcome. You do need to be educated more on the reality of Internet blogging. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have jumped on Sherry for your “moderated” messages.
And for somebody who doesn’t care, you sure keep “defending” and “assuring” yourself.
Hope you’ll peace out soon. Perhaps you need to visit an anti-JP site. You’d find many would agree with you there.
sunshine
Nov 26, 2007 at 10:31 pm
Chae, let it go, baby, it is truly not that serious. You truly do not know me, that is the only reason that you have me being affected. Now, it is over and done with, just like the relationship of BRangelina, you are a little too consumed sweetness. So, I will say to you, let go and let God. Peace Baby.
Neela
Nov 26, 2007 at 10:41 pm
Oh, look, no surprise. It’s sunshine. You’re the one who can’t seem to let go. Oh the extent you’ll go through to prove yourself right. Okay. Guess you like me that much. Or you’re that much of a masochist. If that’s what gets you turned on. So be it. Oh yeah, pot, you might want to look at yourself first and think about who’s being too consumed, sweetness. Just can’t take it that you’re not as clairvoyant as you think you are. Not only are you deluded, you are also a hypocrite.
You keep saying peace and this is it, and yet, you’re back again. Surprise, surprise. Guess what, Brangelina are still together. Suck it up, you ever-so all-assuming and all-too obsessed, sweetness.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 11:14 pm
By the way, if you want it stopped, you can just end it yourself. If it’s not that serious, then, you would actually stop yourself. Yet, you’re here, affected as ever, replying to me. With me, I’m just bored and just having a fun at you. I’ve seen a lot of laughable and farfetched logic, and yours is among the best of the skewed ones. I betcha, you’ll reply again. So much for you saying peace.
And seeing as you’ve polluted this particular post incessantly, we can probably expect you again hmmm, in a matter of minutes, hours, days. You can’t seem to stay away, honey. Do you need validation for your feelings, your opinions? Aww. Aren’t you a psych nurse? Hmm, one would think you would be above all this. But if immaturity and banter is something you crave, then, I’m here for you, honey.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 11:22 pm
Oh, look it’s Sunshine.
By the way, if you want it stopped, you can just end it yourself. If it’s not that serious, then, you would actually stop yourself. Yet, you’re here, affected as ever, replying to me. With me, I’m just bored and just having a fun at you. I’ve seen a lot of laughable and farfetched logic, and yours is among the best of the skewed ones. I betcha, you’ll reply again. So much for you saying peace.
And seeing as you’ve polluted this particular post incessantly, we can probably expect you again hmmm, in a matter of minutes, hours, days. You can’t seem to stay away, honey. Do you need validation for your feelings, your opinions? Aww. Aren’t you a psych nurse? Hmm, one would think you would be above all this. But if immaturity and banter is something you crave, then, I’m here for you, honey.
Chae
Nov 26, 2007 at 11:31 pm
Ya, Neela noonim! Did you get my email? If not, let me know.
Neela
Nov 26, 2007 at 11:46 pm
Chae, I’m just checking it now. Thanks. I’ll just make revisions to it if I have to. If you’re still up later, I’ll just talk to you then about the changes. Or tomorrow morning on the way to campus. Heh. I should be getting busy, but I’m distracted at the moment.
Chae
Nov 27, 2007 at 12:20 am
I’ll be up pretty late, just the usual. I’m latched on Nodame Cantabile! By the way, my Internet’s slow, so, just call my cell.
BlessBrangelina
Nov 27, 2007 at 12:40 am
Chae and Neela
You guys have a lot of energy.
*Sunshine doesn’t want to know the truth, Look how she IGNORED the truth about the NYT.
She wants to create descent here. Truth has nothing to do with it.
Chae
Nov 27, 2007 at 6:07 am
Hiya, Bless Brangelina, seems you’re up late, too, at least in my time zone. It’s not so much that I have a lot of energy, I’m just bored and just want to finish a Japanese series that I just started. It’s probably a result of an eventful holiday. I have the next two weeks off to recover some energy. My sister is also up because she has a big project to complete. But I hear you about psych nurse up there. At the same time, I’m just having fun at her expense because it’s hilarious how she just spins things, utterly out of her bum.
ligaya
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:06 am
Thanks for getting my back, Chae. You did it so well, I didn’t have anything to add. :-)
ligaya
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:07 am
People is polling readers for the 2007 Besties. We have 21 days in which to vote.
http://www.people.com/people/package/bestof2007/0,,20160055_20160291,00.html#flashpolls
–“Who was the best dressed celebrity baby?” It had Zahara & Shiloh competing against Maddox & Pax! (I agonized and then chose Mad & Pax; I’ll keep voting for them too, because if I alternate voting between the brothers & the sisters, I’ll just dilute the vote and none of them will get high numbers.)
–“Who was most talked about?” Angelina & Brad are listed separately. (Wait a minute, is there a pattern here of splitting the vote?)
–“Which couple is most likely to make it to 2017?”
–“What was the best 10 bucks you spent at the movies?”
And 2 crimes: Angie wasn’t named in “Best Red Carpet Moment.” What about that chartreuse dress in Cannes!?! And she wasn’t included in “Who looked the best every day this year?”
ligaya
Nov 27, 2007 at 9:12 am
We have 8 days, 6 hours, and 7 minutes to vote for the People’s Choice Awards. http://www.pcavote.com/pca/
A Mighty Heart is up for Best Independent Movie and Brad & George are up for Best Onscreen Matchup.
Chae
Nov 27, 2007 at 10:49 am
;-) Sure, Ligaya. It isn’t a problem. Even my sister has my back and has jumped in the fray.
We’ll see if miss potty can actually refrain this time around. Tic toc.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: