Pittwatch.com: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Gossip

94 opinions for Angelina Jolie Interview In Elle

• Mary
  Jan 5, 2007 at 9:26 pm

  I was a big fan of Angelina but I think I am so turned off on her comments about Shiloh, what kind of Mother says she doesn’t feel for her as much as her adopted children? what is she trying to prove? oh look how great I am I Love my adopted children more! WTF she seems mad at Shiloh for being born privaleged. I have always defended her in the past, now I’m just turned off.
  Hope she does not have any more biological children, because she doesn’t deserve them. Angelina should just adopt because she seems to Love them more, thats what I’m hearing in this interview. She never seemed excited about this baby, maybe it was just to anchor Brad to her.
  I am officialy turned Off by this woman who proffesses tp love children, Why doesn’t she try
  to love her own flesh and blood, christ I hope Brad doesn’t feel the same way.
  Poor kid, that is in print, maybe one day Shiloh will
  read that! you never see this poor child, yet she trots out the other 2 everywhere! she is full of it and full of herself! Grow up Angelina act like a real Woman and a Real Mother, I for one Love my children so much I would Lay down my life for them! well we know she would for the adopted ones!

• anne
  Jan 6, 2007 at 12:39 am

  viva brangelina!!

• Ana
  Jan 6, 2007 at 6:40 am

  Great interview. Thanks, Robyn!

• michelle
  Jan 6, 2007 at 10:09 am

  i dont like the quote abaut the children!

  “I think I feel so much more for Mad and Z because they’re survivors. Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born, I have less inclination to feel for her”

  it sems that she like Maddox and zahara more than shiloh!

• deb8045
  Jan 6, 2007 at 11:33 am

  checkout Angelina Jolie Posters http://www.mypostercorner.com/aa/angelina_jolie_poster/

• Tiffany
  Jan 6, 2007 at 1:35 pm

  I have been a fan of Brangelina since they got together. Angelina has this Earth Mother persona going on, that is inspiring. I am trying to start my family and she has been an inspiration, in that she is roughly the same age I am. It told me that I didn’t wait too long.

  But I have to say I am a little upset by this article. It makes me feel very sorry for Shiloh. Angelina admits she loves her adopted children more than her biological child. That blows my mind. I personally don’t think it should make a difference, adopted or biological. The children deserve to be loved equally, without favorites. Bad feelings will result from the children if it is obvious to them.

  Hopefully an older Shiloh will not read this article.

  And hopefully the person writing the article got the message wrong. I don’t like feeling bad toward Angelina!

• veronica
  Jan 6, 2007 at 2:21 pm

  Although I appreciate the fact that AJ was open and honest as she usually is about her life I really did not like what she said about her feelings towards Shiloh. I mean, I know she loves her but it really sounded like she feels differently towards her. It’s not any child’s fault what circumstances they are born under and honestly Shiloh may have been born “privileged” but she is the one that is going to compared to BP/AJ for the rest of her life. The media is going to hound this kid forever simply because of who her biological parents are. And what will Shiloh think about her mother’s feelings for her when some idiot brings up this interview 15 years from now? I guess I just feel like by saying this AJ is the one who made the distinction between the children she adopted and the one she gave birth to. Before I just thought of all three kids as the children of Angelina and Brad. Does anyone know what I mean?
  That being said, I can really see where she is coming from in regards to the fear she feels when she thinks of what might have happened to Madd and Zee before she came into their lives.

• dark faith
  Jan 6, 2007 at 3:52 pm

  she in no way said she doesnt love shiloh you missread her words

• libra 21
  Jan 6, 2007 at 4:38 pm

  There has been speculations that this interview is suspicious whether the interview occurred at all. Some say it was cut and paste from somewhere and of course written out of cfontext to suit them. Just have a look at the photo, it is an old photo. If it took place during the filming of Mighty Heart why didn’t they took arecent photo of hers.

• Tiffany
  Jan 6, 2007 at 5:53 pm

  Good point libra21! I thought the photo looked old as well.

• Anna
  Jan 6, 2007 at 6:28 pm

  if she realy said this in interview than she is a
  BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• dark faith
  Jan 6, 2007 at 7:52 pm

  yes i this interview seems weird everywere else she has said she loves her childre the same

• Angel
  Jan 6, 2007 at 8:17 pm

  Many unfortunately do jump into conclusions, and not really aware that the media have the right to reword to suit the population.

• Original jpf
  Jan 6, 2007 at 8:21 pm

  I think people don’t give Angelina’s knack for speaking without prop’s and preparation, or guarded “celeb-speak.” I’m really disapointed by the reactions to her words by people who should know better than to ever believe she means what she’s being accused of. Look deeper, and remember who she is. For one thing, when was the last time she gave an interview that didn’t have something in it that was misenterpreted? Never is when. The one thing that can be counted on without fail is her candor being turned on it’s ears, and into something else. You are taking her way to literal, and out of context. She’s simply explaining that she hopes she doesn’t take for granted that Shiloh’s needs are being met because of the attention she feels Maddox & Zahara require. It’s naive to believe that just because they’re Brad & Angelina Jolie-Pitt’s kids they won’t face issues where their race/ethnicity is concerned. There are studies regarding children who affection was witheld in the first hours let alone months, and people seem to forget that both Maddox and Zahara didn’t come into Angelina’s life until they were 6-7 months old. Where Zahara is concerned, we know she was very seriously ill, and we don’t know if they’ve left lasting medical issues. Point is, Angelina is in her honesty someone who at times one has to seek the essence of what she’s saying, and sometimes that takes a few more reads to “hear what she’s really saying.” Trust that Shiloh is loved, adored, and not an afterthought. JMHO

• Robyn Tippins
  Jan 6, 2007 at 8:26 pm

  I think she’s just trying to say that she doesn’t feel burdened to overcompensate for Shiloh because she’s so gifted with love and money. Also, I can understand exactly what she means on loving them differently at first. I always worried that I couldn’t possibly love additional children as much as the ones I already had. By six months or so I was so in love with the baby that I worried I wasn’t giving the others enough attention.

  We, as parents, stress ourselves far too much about stuff like that.

• jbl
  Jan 6, 2007 at 9:01 pm

  It is so funny how the fans to the one that shall remain nameless allways acts so concerned for Angie’s children or they act as if they have been their fans for a long time and now since this occurred they all of the sudden cant be fans of theirs anymore. BULLSHIT. WE BRAD AND ANGIE FANS ARE NOT BUYING IT YOU ALL ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE. Get lost losers !!!!!!!!!!.

• dark faith
  Jan 6, 2007 at 9:11 pm

  thats true the real fans we know angelina loves her children the same if you are a fan you wouldnt call her names and jump to conclussions it is those people that called the children names for 2 years now they are concern about something jolie may have said real fans dont accuse her

• veronica
  Jan 6, 2007 at 9:34 pm

  Good point on the article maybe being written out of context. I reread the interview…if indeed that is what it was , I’m starting to have doubts. It’s easy to see where some of us are getting negative feelings about what she said, honestly. BUT, I don’t doubt….and I hope no one else does either….that Angie does love Shiloh. And it also dosn’t change the fact that I am a fan of hers. If anything I kind of see that maybe she wasn’t sure how to relate or deal with a child Shiloh’s age (i.e. newborn) and it was easier with Madd and Zee because they were older and more interactive. Also Robyn, you really put it into context for me when you mentioned worrying about different feelings towards additional children.

• Tiffany
  Jan 6, 2007 at 9:45 pm

  I have to agree with dark faith. I think the article is either fabricated, taken out of context, or compiled from a number of different statements.

• libra 21
  Jan 7, 2007 at 12:00 am

  I haven’t read the article myself but I was surfing through JJ and accordingly This was more or less Her words “I feel more for Mad and Zahara but has no inclinitions to feel more for Shiloh because she seems more privilige since she was born” I don’t see anything wrong with that. The thing is people against her will always try to find something in whatever she says to accuse her of anything.

  All she is saying Shiloh has never gone any difficulties in life as Mad and Z. Let’s face it, Mad and Z will soon grow up and will soon be questioning Mum and Dad, why they are different from the rest of their family, maybe Mad already did, I heard he is really a smart boy. Shiloh being the biological don’t have to go through that. I don’t think so she was talking about loving Mad or Z more as some people interpreted, I think she was saying she feels more worried about Mad and Z but have nothing to worry about Shiloh being their biological child and privileged because she came out in this world with a very loving and wealthy parents.

• sick of no integrity journalist
  Jan 7, 2007 at 1:23 am

  It’s most likely taken out of context. Think about it.

• Katie Hesler
  Jan 7, 2007 at 1:34 am

  I don’t believe this fabricating articles about AJ doesn’t care for Shiloh but more incline to give care towards Mad and zahara.. This is a mis-interpretation of her words plus I’ll always read her interview that she loves them equally and even want to have many kids…So there’s no distinction…

• marley11
  Jan 7, 2007 at 2:32 am

  Did those of you screaming that Angelina said she does not love Shiloh as much as Mad and Z actually read the article? She said “I have to be really conscious that I meet Shiloh’s needs, just because I think the other two are more vulnerable. NO WHERE DID SHE SAY SHE DID NOT LOVE ALL THREE OF HER CHILDREN THE SAME.

  She is realistically aware and rightfully worried that Mad and Z will face some harsh difficulties that Shiloh will not face no matter how much Angelina and Brad try to protect Mad and Z. People already say terrrible things about Mad and Z, a baby and a young child, on a number of blogs including racial slurs. Mad is said to be very smart and reads and writes as he has had a tutor since he was 3 years old, and I imagine he already hears things and asks his parents questions. Some of you just want to find fault with Angelina, but this crap about her not loving Shiloh is just bizarre and so stupid. You are probably the same group of people who said Shiloh would be loved more than Mad and Z before she was born.

• dark faith
  Jan 7, 2007 at 2:36 am

  yes true

• dark faith
  Jan 7, 2007 at 3:07 am

  lets not make abig deal out of this enymore mary you were not ever a fan if you can turn this ugly by a missandurstood comment you know if angelina iven made a comment her words are always twisted you know how she has been treatd for 2 years now enybody that has something against her will try to take her down there are pictures of her olone with shiloh you can see the love in her eyes for that child the last one in people the close up of shiloh i have seen that pictures in other sites angelina has shiloh in that picture and she looks like she is kissing her you can see her lips very close to her childs face if you were a fan you would know that people are trying to make her admit she loves shiloh more and they can she is a bad mother but since she has not they are trying to say she loves mad and z more it is unfair for her to be treated like this the true fans will stand behind her lets not make a big deal so others wont

• Ana
  Jan 7, 2007 at 12:18 pm

  Awwww, I see. The haters are coming out of their closet..calling Angie a bitch or that she doesn’t love her children equally because she saids those quote? We don’t even know who the interviewer name is, and when the interview took place. Doesn’t any question the validity of this interview? And if she saids those quotes, you can’t measure or determine she loves Shiloh less than the other two. How many of you have been adopted or have adopted children to questions her love for her children?

  When someone claimed to be a fan of Angie for a long time and than bitched about her love for her children for the 3 lines of the articles makes me lmao. They chose to focused on the 3 lines and not the whole articles, what a shame.

• dark faith
  Jan 7, 2007 at 12:58 pm

  this things always only happen to angelina why doesnt more people question cruise on the love for his adopted children he had been parading the belly then hid the baby now he cant stop parading that baby or the other actors who have bio and adopted children it is unfair she is the only one question why cant they worry more about whitney houston daughter britney spears kids, there are a lot of messed up celebrities on drugs having bio kids and no one worries about them lets jump on angie we cant make the news if we don rag on her how pathetic they are to do this to her

• Sandra
  Jan 7, 2007 at 7:42 pm

  I’ve seen the cover photo as well as the ones with the article. I can say with 100% certainty that they are not new. More like 2 years old if not more. If you are going to have a new sit down article, there are new photos along with it. This is the same thing that Maxim did with their cover recently. The cover they used was three years old. Intelligent people know that quotes are taken out of context. Any way if you are a real fan you are able to read between the lines.

• Robyn Tippins
  Jan 7, 2007 at 8:19 pm

  If they are that old then how is Shiloh mentioned?

• Original jpf
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:08 pm

  The covershots are old and that’s verifiable but I’m not convinced the interview is fake. Some lean more towards the words being a compilation of various sitdowns, and it may be, but I’ve read everyone, and read everyone, and I’m not having trouble believing that this one is authentic. Personally, I think people want to call foul on it because they’re uncomfortable with the wording. I think it’s easier for some to shine it on as being a misrepresentation than to accept Angelinas way of communicating. I reiterate that as far as I’m concerned, she’s said nothing scandalous, or horrid and I’m sorry people can’t see that too. JMHO

• Ana
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:09 pm

  If they are that old then how is Shiloh mentioned?

  I think Elle bought the interviews from the Indian’s media and cut and paste and made up some of the quotes themselves. It happened to an actress before from Elle UK and she sued them. I’m surprised, no one question the validity of this mag, and who is the interviewer.

  Real fan of Angie would not questions her love for her kids because since she’s a mother all she talked about most is the love for her kids. How many times had she gone on records to say she loves them equally and how they are a joy to her life? I’m disappointed with these so-called fans of hers. They just wait for the right moments to attack her as a mother, the woman who value and love her kids more than her own life.

• Original jpf
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:18 pm

  ^^^make that….I’ve read each interview as it comes, and I’ve READ everyone of her interview except the obvious tabloid ones that claim this source, or that unamed person said this, that and the other. If you notice, the ELLE mag doesn’t refer to anyone without a name. Someone is asking, and only Angelina is answering. Maybe when someone actually gets their hands on the issue than can post the name of the interviewer. Usally they will have the photo and/or bio of the interviewer in the front of the mag.

• Tina
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:39 pm

  I have admired Angelina for awhile now but found the comments she made in Elle regarding her children to be very disturbing. I hope that in the coming days,she will address these comments and either own up to them or clarify them. As a human being and a mother,I very much hope that these comments were taken out of context or false altogether. If she did ,in fact make such comments,I must say that I will lose alot of respect for her as a mother and human being. As fans,people should not be shocked,surprised or feel the need to “defend” her. She is a flawed person like the rest of us and those comments.of true make that quite obvious.

• dark faith
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:40 pm

  i dont think she said enything bad eather i told my sister about it and she agreed in no way she said she loves shiloh less

• viva brangelina
  Jan 7, 2007 at 9:54 pm

  the real brangelina fans know how to comment on this interview.
  we know angie. and we saw and heard her lively that she loves her kids all the same. remember the anderson cooper interview?
  i agree with libra21 and dark faith.
  as for the haters, please don’t say that you’re a fan if you call her names. these haters will always search for some weakness and nagative things on angie.
  anyway, this doesn’t change the way i feel for angie and brad.

• Tina
  Jan 7, 2007 at 10:07 pm

  I believe one can support and be a “fan” but also be wise enough to know when this person makes a mistake or uses poor judgement. Many seem to want to create these people in our own image, one that would never say such things or feel such a way, yet we forget that like everyone else, actors have issues too. I have been somewhat puzzled my Angelina’s choices where Shiloh is concerned since the childs birth. It seemed ok to use her pictures to get donations for wonderful causes,yet since then the child is rarely seen out in public. I found this odd..when Brad and Angelina are pictured often doing things with Maddox and Zahara,Shiloh remains absent. True she is young but it’s ok to take her out and get her some fresh air too. As I recall,,Zahara was out and about in LA very shortly after her arrival in the US and she was in a much more fragile condition then a seemingly healthy Shiloh. It is odd.

• viva brangelina
  Jan 7, 2007 at 10:45 pm

  by the way,
  do you guys really think that elle will do that (manipulating the story)? i saw the scans, and those are indeed old photos of angie.
  but i just couldn’t believe that a magazine like elle will do nasty stuff like that. is elle credible enuf as vogue mag?

• green
  Jan 8, 2007 at 1:04 am

  Fascinating. Bits of that interview seem like they were taken out of the recent ‘in-depth’ interview that surfaced from the Philippine Inquirer, and even that to me was suspect because so much of her responses didn’t sound like Angelina at all. (I say this because I am familiar with the style of writing seen in Filipino publications. It just seemed to me that some of her answers sounded more like the interviewer’s interpretations of her words.)

  Whether or not the Elle interview is legit it still amazes me that anyone can conclude from it that she doesn’t love her children equally. When she said she had ‘less inclination’ to feel for her (Shiloh)’ I read that to mean she didn’t feel for her in a sense that Shiloh didn’t have to endure the hardships that her siblings did. This is a fact but doesn’t imply that Angelina loves her less, and yes Shiloh will be treated differently by the media and the world no matter how much Brad and Angelina treat them equally. Also, there was another interview where Angelina mentions that it’s sweet that she sees Brad in Shiloh when she sometimes looks at her. Now I didn’t see anyone jumping all over that one and worrying that Madd and Z might read that one day and feel rejected. I’d like to think that this couple put as much thought into having a biological baby as much as they did into adopting one and they’ve considered all the issues ad scenarios.

  At the very least that comment probably represents a few seconds in a wider conversation that will now, unfortunately, incite all manner of annimosity from those who are inclined to digest that sort of thing as real news. Sort of like commenting on a single celeb photo and believing it to convey the absolute truth about what that person is all about. Off course that’s why the tabloids make all that money.

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 2:47 am

  well all this got me thinking to much about something so dumb i read the cards for them yes i do that i ask about that interview and yes its altered that interview it’s not right and oviously angelina doesnt know this has been done i asked about other things angelina and brad are not going to break up eny time soon in fact they will have another bio baby, if itseems angelina iven when she talks doesnt say too much about the kids or her love for brad if you notice angelina’s lips the upper one is smaller than the bottom one mine are like that too what that say of people like us is we are not exactly emotional people and we tend to hide our feelings and not openly express them too much also the not wanting to be hugged ask me when was the last time i let enyone hugged me i usually run away from people if they try but in the case of angelina she is extroverted and she is a gemminy and thins fly out of her mouth thats why people get confussed about her i am a virgo and i am introverted and ussualy shy my father is a gemminy dont worry about shiloh i asked the cards she is fine she loves that kid as much about my father loves my sisters and i equaly i read the cards for other people i am usually right about this things

• kathy
  Jan 8, 2007 at 10:44 am

  This is a link showing AG out shopping wiht baby Shi and Mad…. I still think she is a loving mother and her comments were taken out of context.
  http://perezhilton.com/topics/angelina_jolie/quote_of_the_day_20070108.php

• Robyn
  Jan 8, 2007 at 10:53 am

  Me too, I can’t see any evidence she doesn’t adore Shiloh. Look at this older image:

  http://www.justjared.com/2006/10/20/shiloh-jolie-pitt-india/

• Robyn
  Jan 8, 2007 at 10:54 am

  Kathy, Maddox gets cuter everyday. Thanks for the heads up :)

• veronica
  Jan 8, 2007 at 12:18 pm

  I just read that today is Zee’s 2nd birthday! HAPPY BIRTHDAY WISHES TO HER!!!!

• green
  Jan 8, 2007 at 12:22 pm

  I don’t know if it’s bee mentioned already but this article was out of Elle UK. Here’s a link that talks a bit about the same interview.

  http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272610847.shtml

  So I don’t know if that gives it more or less cred than an Elle US article.

• green
  Jan 8, 2007 at 12:29 pm

  Sorry, I forgot to add this to the last post. This shows the cover of the mag with a photo of Angelina taken in 2003. The general consensus seems to be that both the cover and inside photo were completely Photoshopped, which again makes me wonder about the credibility of the so called ‘interview’.

  http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/10193060.html

• Jenny
  Jan 8, 2007 at 12:59 pm

  You people are Nuts. Angelina doesn’t have “White Guilt”. I’m not so sure that you people would so annoyed if the children were all the same race. Angelina does not love Shiloh less than her siblings. Her comment referred to the decisions she made earlier regarding Brad’s family making more of an effort with Shiloh than with the two older grandchildren. Initially, Brad’s family showed preference to Shiloh. In fact, they have three grandchildren, not one from Brad. Angelina is very sensitive to paternal rejection. Growing up, Angelina felt rejected and abandoned by her father. As he divorced her Mom and started a new family, leaving Angelina and her brother as the secondary children; you know the stepchild cliché’ where the biological father is not emotionally sensitive or adequately financially responsible for the first set of kids after he divorces their mother and moves on to the next family. As a result, she knows from personal experience that biology does not make a parent. It takes Commitment, protection, love and attention to the children makes one a parent. It hurts her to see the same thing happen to her children that happened to her. In protecting the children she would not allow Brads parents to see Shiloh without her other siblings and she would not accept gifts for Shiloh without her siblings receiving gifts. Brads parents were offended and expressed to the media that Angelina was controlling and preventing them from seeing their grandchild. I think Angelina did the correct thing. I have experienced a similar situation in my own family where their was a preference towards me for similar reasons, but we are of the same race, and my sister, who was left out has lots of elf inflicting issues and destructive behavior due to her childhood emotional pain. She is unaware that the self destructive behavior is due to abandonment issues. I was the preferred child. If I had to relive growing up, I would have stuck with my sister and rejected the preferential treatment.

  Brad has helped them understand that he has three kids and his parents are now accepting of all the children. As a matter of fact Brad’s sister adopted children from Ethiopia also. Initially, Angelina was unwilling to compromise on that issue. But now both parties have come to middle on the issue and recognized that not knowing their grandparents is not good for the three children. Angelina hasn’t spoken to her John Volt in five years and has legally changed her name deleting Volt.

  I said all that to simply say that
  Angelina does not have a PR firm. Therefore, she speaks candidly. Often, the press misconstrues her thoughts in the editing process. PR firms are valuable for an entertainer’s career because the Reps always ask for pre-questions, and often script the responses. The PR Rep has relationships with the journalist, who understands that if they do not write what is scripted that journalist will not have access to any of the PR firms clients. For an entertainment journalist that would mean career suicide.

  Moreover, Angelina has said many times that finding her children in the world is no different than birthing them. She also, said in many interviews that she did not know anything about children, and chose Maddox because he smiled and embraced her immediately. When she received Maddox, the Namibian African women taught her how to care for him while she was their filming. She often says that he taught her to be a Mom. She often says that you earn being a parent by your children accepting you as their parent. I suspect that it is upsetting to her that the world puts so much attention on Shiloh as the special one. My god, there is a wax figure of Shiloh. I can understand Angelina’s position, whether her children came to her through her heart or her womb, her children are the same. Moreover, birthing a child doesn’t make you maternal. Mothering a child makes you maternal. It appears that she connects better with children at six months when they have a personality. The comment about Shiloh being privileged refers the fact that Shiloh had the best prenatal care where in Zahara was born malnourished, needed to be hospitalized when Angelina brought her back to the states and has Rickets(sp) as a result of malnutrition. It is highly likely that Mad will be short and bald by 25 years old, and Zahara is already severely bow legged from Rickets and will probably get worse as she ages, while Shiloh will have super-model looks and will be treated like Hollywood royalty. Shiloh will be at least 5′10 with dark blond hair, thin with a perfect features (perfect nose, lips, long legs and big boobs) at 25. From what I’ve read about Brad’s growing up, his parents made it a point to make sure he knew that his extraordinary beauty was to be used for good and not evil.

• Original jpf
  Jan 8, 2007 at 1:09 pm

  Kathy, just a correction on the photo. That’s Zahara in the photo not Shiloh.

• Andrea
  Jan 8, 2007 at 2:08 pm

  I really thought Angelina was a great mother, seeing her latley in all these interviews she really shined and now she goes and says that she feel more for her adopted children, it is gross and she should never have had a baby she should have just kept on adopting (POOR SHILOH)well I have completely changed my mind about her!!!!

• Robyn
  Jan 8, 2007 at 2:18 pm

  As I’ve said before, some of us didn’t bond instantly with our newborns to the extent that we bonded with the children we’d had for years. That doesn’t make any of us bad parents. However, when people do their best to make good parents feel horrible and guilty, I question their own certainty in their parenting skills.

  I’m sure Angie knows she’s a great mom and anyone who feels differently surely can stop reading about her.

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 2:48 pm

  when did madd and z become angelina adopted children in the eyes of the supposedly jolie-pitt fans again they are all her children it just shows iven some jolie-pitt fans can be resentful of 2 small children for not being angelina’s bio children

• Original jpf
  Jan 8, 2007 at 3:02 pm

  Andrea Says: January 8th, 2007 at 2:08 pm

  I really thought Angelina was a great mother, seeing her latley in all these interviews she really shined and now she goes and says that she feel more for her adopted children, it is gross and she should never have had a baby she should have just kept on adopting (POOR SHILOH)well I have completely changed my mind about her!!!!

  ^^^

  I seriously hate lying hypocrites pretending some great past respect for Angelina Jolie, and with one interview it’s disapated into a puddle of disgust. I’d have more respect for “you” and those like youself if there was even a modicum of truth and honest in your words. Why not own up to never feeling any different about Angelina than you do now? Why lie? What, or who does it benefit to perpatrate a farce? She (AJ) doesn’t owe you a reason to like or dislike her. She doesn’t even know you’re on this earth and so who is it you and the rest feel the need to convince you’ve shared a past affection for her and now dont?

• libra 21
  Jan 8, 2007 at 4:02 pm

  Sometimes I wonder where all this hate coming from, I mean whatever Angie did to deserve this relentless attacks on her. The only reason I know is that she is paying a high price being involve with Brad.

  I stick to my first instinct, that this supposedly interview never happened at all, it was fabricated to make Angie look bad as a mother. Recently she was voted again as the best mom in hollywood and people have been praising her for this, now they are trying to destroy that good image. Mind you most UK tabloids are soo pro Jen.

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 4:15 pm

  frustrading and dissapointed so-called fans can turn this ugly

• Lily
  Jan 8, 2007 at 4:58 pm

  We don’t have to read any articles to know that she loves Shiloh so much. Just look at the happiness in her face during her pregnancy and after the birth. She’s stunning and is genuinely happy having a baby with the man she loves.

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 5:17 pm

  thankfully the real fans are sticking by her is very sad things have to come to this to know to know who is just there for only the happy times and not willing to support when someone makes a mistake

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 5:26 pm

  angelina did not call shiloh a blob it was the interviewer who suggested that term i think i saw that on baby blog

• Erica
  Jan 8, 2007 at 6:14 pm

  i Think, you people are all jumping to conclusion here. First of all these interviews are edited. I think she is simply trying to say she has a lot more pity for her adopted kids. She has said she loves all of her children equally on larry king live and other media outlets.

• libra 21
  Jan 8, 2007 at 9:25 pm

  dark faith, they were never a fan in the first place, how can someone idolize anyone he/she does not trust or have no faith in. I love Angie because I admire her as a person, I admire her works, I admire her unselfishness, her originality and being herself just doing what she thinks is right. She does not give a damn of the criticism being thrown to her left and right. She is so natural and so unassuming. She plays with the dirt if she has to and be elegant when the situation requires. She could be anything she chooses to. She is beautiful but doesn’t flaunts it, she is one of the A-list star yet so humble.

• Ana
  Jan 8, 2007 at 10:58 pm

  libra and darkfaith, I agree with you. It’s the so-called long time fans of Angie or trolls the one who wait for the right moment to attack Angie.

• dark faith
  Jan 8, 2007 at 11:21 pm

  i now they are trolls are they turning in to haters as well all their admiration they said they had was a lie are they going to bash her and caller names they are becoming the haters they criticise i knpw angelina will rise above this for all the real fans thank you

• dark faith
  Jan 9, 2007 at 1:27 am

  i was tatching a tv show in one of the spanish tv shows in the morning and a lady in the show said we die the same way we live for all those who boliave in heaven or hell she said is us who create our own heaven or hell and for all the angelina haters who live with hate in their heart will die as that haters and for all those who proffesed they were fans and turn their back on her so quickly over one comment will die as traitors and cowards and i feel sorry for them because they are also liers those people they were only conviniant fans not true, fans they were not real fans ever

  i agree with you libra 21, ana, viva brangelina and the other true fans

• viva brangelina
  Jan 9, 2007 at 2:16 am

  i also love what jenny wrote.
  *gigle* how can you say that you’re a big fan of angelina and failed to get the meaning of her statement?
  THAT one is ODD.

• Jill
  Jan 9, 2007 at 3:48 am

  It’s grainy is the understatement of the year….gave up, too hard to read and can’t get the American magazine in Australia. If anyone else has a copy, any chance of re-posting a clearer copy here?

  Thanks

• dark faith
  Jan 9, 2007 at 3:23 pm

  does eny body think the people doing this to angelina are just trying to break her because she seems so strong and no matter how much people have tried to bring her down she hasnt budge and they keep trowing things at her, blowing everything she says out of proportion just to see how much she can take i mean it’s pretty clear that many of this people hate her for being with brad pitt specially because of her past they cant see she has changed or that she cant be good they dont want him with her he is the golden boy how dare this bad girl be with him he is hardly ever called eny bad names not as much as she is they are trying to take her down because he loves her they want others to turn on her because she doesnt leave him and the so called-fans now traitors who have turned were only looking for a reason to hate her i dont andurstand why they cant move on i know they are celebrities but everybody needs peace i am sad for them

• dark faith
  Jan 9, 2007 at 4:35 pm

  i just saw inside edition they were at the premiare of god fergot about us they looked very in love and very happy they dont let what haters say about them or their family affect by what i saw

• veronica
  Jan 9, 2007 at 11:25 pm

  jill…..copy it to your pictures folder on your computer then zoom in

• Andrea
  Jan 10, 2007 at 12:07 pm

  I am not a lying hyporcrite but I guess you no me and how I feel, I respected Angelina and her missions, I feel that her comments were wrong and maybe she should keep adopting and not have natural children and its nice that you did not even leave your name when you commented on my BLOB oh I meant BLOG!!!!!

• Andrea
  Jan 10, 2007 at 12:09 pm

  Well I will never visit this website again, I am being called a lying Hypocrite…

• k
  Jan 10, 2007 at 5:29 pm

  Pretty soon this website should be renamed Joliewatch.com instead of Pittwatch.com. Is there nothing left of Brad’s that Angelina has not taken over or tried to control. He could not even have the spotlight for the premier of his movie. She was there giving her thoughts and spins on the movie. During the Good Shephard opening Brad took the back seat and let her have the stage so he wouldn’t upstage her. Angelina
  should not upstage Brad every chance she gets. He worked just as hard as she does. It’s generous of
  Angelina to give all the time, but many of other
  famous give thousands and thousands of dollars to the less fortunate and every donation does not make the front page news. Look at Andre Agassi. I think his donations are more sincere because he doesn’t have his publicist advertise EVERY donation he gives. Brad was never that way before
  the Angelina era. At least it seems like Jen let Brad be himself.

• Jillian
  Jan 11, 2007 at 8:37 pm

  Well it seems like UK Elle magazine & USA Elle magazine may have given two different versions of the same story.

  Below is an extract from UK Elle magazine:

  Speaking in an interview with UK Elle magazine, the mum-of-three explained that at the time her new beau was more intent on having a child than she was. “Some men have kids when they’re not ready and some men know they want to take it seriously and wait until they’re absolutely ready,” she said. “You could say Brad changed me.”

  The 31-year-old went on to say she loved her two adopted youngsters Maddox and Zahara, JUST as much as her new baby.

  Angelina confessed that the difficult start her first two children had in life made her feel a special sympathy for them.” I think I feel so much more for Madd and Zee because they’re survivors, they came through so much”.

  She said, “Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born. I’m conscious that I have to make sure I don’t ignore her needs, just because I think the others are more vulnerable.”

  I think a lot of people on here are totally misinterpreting her words. As its obvious to me she deeply loves all her children but is aware the adopted children have more specialised needs because of their backgrounds and difficult start in life.

• sheri
  Jan 11, 2007 at 10:48 pm

  Goes to show that perhaps Shiloh shines brighter than Angelina, so the comment doesn’t surprise me. She is so insecure. Brat Pitt will be there for the sweet little girl when Angelina decides to give her up. I do believe that Brad WILL eventually leave her. Just a matter of time.

• bamzs
  Jan 12, 2007 at 11:55 am

  AJ is an awesome person and nomatter what people say about them that will never change. People have to put in mind that the media is just full of crap, and when it comes down to it who do you believe the media who are just craving for attention and money (shit brains) or a peeson like AJ who has given a lot of her time to help people and make a better future for kids. just think about it and get back to me with an answer.

• dark faith
  Jan 12, 2007 at 3:28 pm

  you are right bamzs

• dark faith
  Jan 13, 2007 at 1:50 pm

  the idiot commentor 69 from k this site is about both jolie and pitt we want to hear about both of them if you dont like it then dont read it, TGS was angelinas movie pitt had nothing to do with it, he has had the spotlight in babel i think i have read your post in other sites were you also said angelina stole the spotlight from pitt by giving birth go let your vile poison were others want to read it idiot 69 comment leave angelina olone as for you go to hell shery

• vicki
  Jan 13, 2007 at 9:14 pm

  to #69, angelina has said the reason it is made public when she does something for charities or someone less fortunate it is b/c the more attention to the CAUSE the better. she certainly doesn’t need the publicity but the causes do. if you don’t like pittwatch that is unfortunate but i am sure since brad loves angelina it would be hard to profile and update about him without including her. as to jen letting brad be himself, he seems much happier now. he seems mature and not self involved. he has a family and love.

• libra 21
  Jan 14, 2007 at 8:18 pm

  to No 69 K

  Brad was never allowed to be himself with Jen. Jen was so insecure control freak. Brad was so smoothered that his talents, skills and the person within him was so subdued. Look at him now, he matured as a man (he was just a pretty boy with Jen) as an actor and now has the chance of winning the G Globes, the Oscar etc, which he never achieved with Jen. I find him sexier and more manly now. Jen did not change, she’s still the same girl I saw 10 years ago.

• lynn
  Jan 15, 2007 at 11:48 am

  angelina doesn’t deserve to have shiloh. What kind of mother says that she loves the other 2 children more then the other? she should have just given shiloh up for adoption so someone who would truly love her could have her! She may be a good mother to her adopted children but she’s a terrible person for saying she doesn’t love her real child. she’s admitting that there’s a difference in the children.

• dark faith
  Jan 15, 2007 at 5:18 pm

  yiu are stupid lynn angelina has all her children tattood on her arm

• Mocco
  Jan 16, 2007 at 11:06 am

  I agree with you Lynn, she in one breathe says there is no difference and then in the next draws a very defining line. All this Good Will stuff has gone to her head .. she needs a reality check.

• Mocco
  Jan 16, 2007 at 11:15 am

  to dark faith .. she also had billy bob on her arm at one time too. what does that mean?

• dark faith
  Jan 16, 2007 at 1:26 pm

  nothing to me mocco means bugger or snot in inglish if you dont like it then dont read it billy was just a man men are plenty out there at this stage we dont know enything so i dont judge her and real fans dont eather the children look happy and that is all that matters

• Mocco
  Jan 16, 2007 at 2:08 pm

  good point .. not a real fan of hers that much you are correct about. Also right on about the plenty men thing .. sure there be a time in the future where she will have fallen for another costar. She said in many interviews that is what she does. She switches stories to make her self seem dark, deep .. Watever! She can explain her tramp stamps to her daughters on how most them included some night w/strange guys in different countries.

• dark faith
  Jan 16, 2007 at 5:48 pm

  mocco you dont have to read about her if you dont like her avoid her then, there is no need to come to a jolie-pitt friendly site to write crap we have herd from other haters before why waste youre time, we like her and we dont care if you dont, we are not begging people to like her we are just asking you to move on

• Mocco
  Jan 16, 2007 at 9:46 pm

  Is that you Angelina???

• Mocco
  Jan 16, 2007 at 9:50 pm

  Also .. what is this we crap (you have a mouse in your pocket?) I see some here and there liking her .. most have an option about her and not all good. You are her defender, are you wearing her blood around your neck?

• vicki
  Jan 17, 2007 at 9:39 am

  mocco, the “we” means those of us on this site who admire brad and angelina. they are humanitarians, they seem to be trying to build a strong and happy family. why the ill will?

• Alec
  Jan 18, 2007 at 11:51 am

  Mocco, I think you have are the problem. You appear to attach those who disagree with you, and your hostile and loathsome words are quite irritating. I aggree with Dark Faith, maybe you should move on.

• Alec
  Jan 18, 2007 at 12:00 pm

  It seems to me that many of the Brad fans are searching for things to hate about Angelina. You must fanstasize that if he is not with the “One” then you might have a chance. It is obvious that the article was misinterpreted. Yet so many of you continue on aspousing this nonsense. Agelina’s children are obviously the most precious to her, and it’s clear that she dosn’t prefer one over the other. You people act as if you are off your meds.

• Mocco
  Jan 18, 2007 at 2:46 pm

  Alec, everyone is entitled to an opinion .. never did I start saying things to anyone directly until dark faith starting gettin nasty tell me to shut up .. calling me names, i should have taken the high road and let dark faith continue to be insulting loser but I had stated my opinion (which I thought that is what blogs were about) and suddenly I was attacked by everyone. Every single angie lover throws out that anyone that does not worship her like a stalker has a problem. Which I agreed on many things abuot her, and said I used to be fan .. just not as of lately (agreed with others that she is shwoing her true colors) Angie-lovers are the 1st ones to throw out nasty things .. let me quote you “I think you have are the problem” “You people act as if you are off your meds.” Angie-Lovers are very hateful when someone does not workship like you .. and angie-lovers get very personal and lose their head instead of staying on track of the subject which is angie not me. Very strange .. like I have said on another blog on this site, I have never been on a blog and after dealing with the kind of people I have on this site .. I prolly never will again. I think all of you angie-lovers could take a lesson from your GOD’s (Angie) book of advice and not judge. You all judge so much. Speech is free and so is an opinion. I hope you all find your own real life BP & AJ in life so you can move on too..

  PS. Angie-Lovers use the hate alot when someone disagrees or is not a fan of (which what I used NEVER did I use the word HATE)HATE is a very strong word and you guys throw it around a lot .. I feel for all of you that get so worked up and use that word so often in your comments. I can honestly say there is not one person in this world that I hate .. can you say that?

• pat
  Jan 20, 2007 at 6:38 pm

  I’m not a fan of angie but. How can you continue to be a fan of a women whom cheated with a married man. And over look that because she adopted two kids and doing humantarian work. What happened to morals, she doesn’t have any. I feel sorry for her kids.

• Cinnabana
  Jan 20, 2007 at 8:24 pm

  It is easy to be a fan of Angie…clearly she has changed and moved on to be a better person. I wish you haters would do the same. It is called evolving…and by the way she never stole any man. These men are human beings with minds of their own…they wanted her not the other way around. So enough with the bull and moralizing. If the men were happy why would they leave. Enough said she didn’t steal these men. Get a life of your own.

• pat
  Jan 21, 2007 at 10:08 am

  It’s your opinion that she has changed and move on, you aren’t her close friend, you are only a fan. I’m not a fan. I just wanted to comment about you crazy fans and how you hold up these celebrities as icons. Find some real people to look-up to, not celebrities.
  I’m not fan of brad either, it takes two to tango. Angie isn’t an innocent bystander of men, she wanted to be with brad.

  You should get a life of your own. Just to reinorate I’m not a fan. I just wanted to comment , which is allow in the US

• Amy
  Apr 30, 2007 at 5:28 am

  This website is supposed to be for Brad & Angie is a part of Brad (a big part of Brad!). So, let the real lovers of this couple enjoy exchanging good notes. Haters need to find their own website. Love is believing, love is blind. We all love our idols (Brad & Angie) and the children they care for. All their four children are lucky to be with parents who has so much passion about life and the world that revolves around them. Shiloh will be most proud to be given the opportunity to be with all his brothers and sisters (now and the futute to come) from all over the world. Her life will be so reach of knowledge.

• ME
  Jan 14, 2008 at 5:50 am

  Hy! I never posted before on this site, or on any other site, to defent angelina. I usually just read and move on. But this time I was outraged of how the words were twisted. I’m not a native american, but i’ve studied english all my life. “To feel for (someone) is a typical expression in english-and you should know better because you’re americans- which is equivalent to feeling sympathetic for someone, feeling sorry for someone…When you say to smb “I feel for you” it means that you feel sorry for his situation, for what he’s going through. So, what angie was really saying is that she feels (more) sorry for the adopted ones, because they gone through a lot, while shiloh was born in their familly. She was a wanted kid from the beginning and she didn’t suffer hunger, pain etc like the others. She has no reason to feel sorry for her. God! Read between the lines, people!!! How can you even imagine that she could love her biological child less than her adopted ones. See, this is how thing get missunderstood!!! And it’s a shame. I’m sure that she was affected by all the comments that were made after the interview was posted.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: