Angelina talks about St. Johns
From ET! at Yahoo:
The headline-making actress is gracing the pages of fashion
magazines everywhere as the face of St. John. “I am a working mother
who has set goals to accomplish a lot in this world,” she says. “I want
my wardrobe to be beautiful, sexy and comfortable — all at the same
time. St. John is all of those things.”The Oscar winner says she’s proud to be a part of a company that has
always honored powerful women. “St. John has always been worn by strong
and independent women who truly appreciate the quality that St. John
offers,” she says. “I am happy to be a part of that tradition and more
importantly part of taking that tradition into the future.”
Once again, here is one of the pictures from her St. Johns campaign…so pretty:

Related Stories
POSTED IN: Angelina Jolie, Angelina Jolie Pictures, Fashion


6 opinions for Angelina talks about St. Johns
jagres54
Sep 12, 2006 at 10:00 pm
I for one, am truly happy that St. John picked AJ as their model for their clothes. She has soooooooooo much class, and not to mention how extremely GORGEOUS she is. Not many women out there can beat her LOOKS! Kudos for St. John’s in selecting Angelina Jolie as their model for their clothes. She looks just fabulous. She is soooooo BEAUTIFUL! AMAZING!!!!
viva brangelina
Sep 12, 2006 at 10:15 pm
She IS georgeos, no doubt about it.
But, what you guys think about that hillary rodham clinton said that St. John was wrong to picked angie as their new face becuz she’s tacky while st. john is elegant?
perhaps becuz hil had this bad experience with ‘another’ woman and she thinks angie is the other woman in brad and chin’s marriage…*lol*
may
Sep 25, 2006 at 5:10 am
Well said viva brangelina, lol!
jagres54
Sep 25, 2006 at 11:40 pm
Yes! I so totally agree with you viva brangelina! We must never, ever forget hil’s other woman while she was in the white house. Musn’t we!!! Bottomline, I guess some of these women out there, that have been hurt sooooo bad like little ms. chinnifer are soooooo totally sticking together. Thats okay! There’s nothing wrong with that, but as far as taking it out on AJ, well thats just sooooo totally wrong. As far as I’m concerned, AJ did nothing wrong. I’ll say it a million times, AJ did not twist BP’s arm for sex, or for any other reason, as far as I’m concerned. BP is the one that strayed from his marriage to that oh so ugly chinnifer. So, if anything, all of you fans out there should be upset with BP, not AJ. She just did her job by showing up and playing her part, but it was BP that forgot all about his chinnifer. Guess he was just tooooo darned bored with this TV actress, where he wanted to just be with someone more exciting. Even if it wouldn’t of been AJ, BP would of eventually found someone else. Thats what I strongly feel. BP was ripe and ready to get out of that house with chinnifer, and all of you chinnifer fans have to accept this; because I truly believe that that is what happened. He just grew tooooooo damn tired of her, and he obviously fell out of love with her. Bottomline!! So, as far as St. Johns clothing, I sooooo truly believe that AJ can wear those clothes oh so gorgeously, and I’m soooooo sure that they know this. AJ is just one beautiful woman. And, everything just looks so good on her, where all of her modeling experience comes out. All of you out there, need to understand that chinnifer will never be the beauty that AJ is, and I know that it is sooooo hard for all of you to understand this. Personally, I so can’t stand to look at her. To me, she’s UGLY, and downright HOMELY!!! AND, SHE IS NOT MOVIE STAR MATERIAL!!!! I WILL SAY THIS A MILLION TIMES!!! WATCHING HER IS LIKE WATCHING TV. BORING!!! SOOOOOO TOTALLY BORING!!!!!
JOY
Jan 5, 2007 at 4:28 pm
YES. SHE IS NOT A MATERIAL STAR. SHE VERY SIMPLE
LOIS
Jan 5, 2007 at 4:40 pm
JENIFER ANISTON CAN’T COMPAIRE TO ANGELINA JOLIE. SHE IS SO INFERIOR .ANGIE IS A BEAUTIFUL STAR, TALENTED STAR, SHE GOT OSCAR AND FEW GOLDEN GLOBES . BRAD PITT IS SMART TO GET ANGIE.THEY ARE PERFECT COUPLE. THEY GOT BEAUTIFUL KIDS.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: