Brad Pitt on CNN again
Don’t forget to tune in to Larry King Live again tonight (9 ET, check your local listings for sure). It’s a bonus segment featuring a second half of Larry King’s interview with Brad Pitt. Apparently it’s quite compelling and I’ve heard rumors that it’s uncensored.
Also, if you go to the Larry King homepage, you can subscribe to a podcast (over on the right) about Brad and his Make It Right campaign.
Technorati Tags: brad pitt, larry king, make it right, cnn
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Activism, Brad Pitt, Brad Pitt Pictures, Make It Right
46 opinions for Brad Pitt on CNN again
anamanzana
Dec 11, 2007 at 1:51 pm
Sounds good. What do you mean by uncensored? Does that mean un-edited? or that LK was able to ask any question he wanted?
irma
Dec 11, 2007 at 2:07 pm
We were in Cocoa Beach when it showed LK’s interview with Brad Pitt & then it says another uncut & uncensored interview coming up which is today. I don’t have CNN at home but hopefully fans will post the interview or I will just order the tape interview from CNN. I wonder what LK will ask Brad this time?
BlessBrangelina
Dec 11, 2007 at 3:45 pm
Yeah am wandering what he is going to show too.
liliwaton
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:23 pm
good to know..i haven’t seen the interview yet..thanks for the info..
madd
Dec 11, 2007 at 6:03 pm
Brad will be guesting on Regis & Kelly, Dec 17.
Angelina is nominated in BFCA (Lead Actress).
irma
Dec 11, 2007 at 6:12 pm
Is it confirmed that Brad will be guesting at Regis & Kelly? It’s nice to know that Ange is nominated again. Brad, Ange & kids are my pride & joy as a fan. God bless them always.
angela
Dec 11, 2007 at 6:17 pm
we have cnn at home but i don’t know what time LK will be shown. in the first half of his interview there were plenty of questions about zahara. i hope in the second half he gets to talk about angie and the 3 other kids. i miss shiloh already! :)
chevjuls
Dec 11, 2007 at 7:40 pm
I don’t mean to go off the subject, but did anyone where kylie sister, dannii minogue where she wants to break up brad and angelina, because she wants him. Is the crazy or what. reply.
Liz
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:29 am
Patiently waiting for CNN interview I probably order the tape but not sure how to do that because this is my first….I’ve a fan of Jolie-Pitt. Regards to all
SoulHunter
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:35 am
good bless the hat makers!
http://www.spymac.com/details/?2317043
musicisourhigh
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:34 am
Was Danii taped saying that? If not then she might have said it she might not. I really don’t trust “quotes” anymore because so many are made up. If so, it is possible that it was said for publicity. It seems that anything that is related to Brad & Angelina makes it to print or on television and I do believe that many times those who are out for publicity will insert their names to get more press
just my opinion
cheryl
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:47 am
saw the show last night. Love Brad Pitt. What a dynamic couple he and Angelina are becomming. And so humble. You could tell Larry was impressed .
cee
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:02 am
I am happy that Brad is finally speaking out about what he believes and the things he is doing and how he feels about his family and his relationship with Angie. I think it stops a lot of the speculating based on tabloid lies. They are becoming a well respected couple no matter where they are Hollywood, NOLA, Europe. As LK to AC “they are a great couple”.
Ana
Dec 12, 2007 at 10:57 am
I LOVE BRAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Andrea
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:40 pm
I am a big fan of Angelina and Brad, but now Angelina is quoted as saying that Shiloh is an outcast because of her blonde hair and blue eyes?? and Brad just sits there and praises his kids as equals and says they are brother and sister and there is no difference, now I am sure this was taken out of context but she never has anything nice to say about the poor little thing…any clarification would be very helpful….I did see this on MSNBC??? not a gossip magazine…
ligaya
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Yes, I want more accurate, positive coverage of the REAL Angelina & Brad - at least once a week, whether in print, tv/radio, internet, whatever. That should neutralize the tabloid stuff.
Angelina & Brad are great individually, and they are a Super-Great couple. Love the Jolie-Pitt family!
Janie
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Please do not use tabloid trash as something to quote. That nonesense is from a British tabloid and should never be believed.
Andrea
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:51 pm
Thanks for letting me know, I figured it was not true, I have just seen it so much these past few days…and you do not need to get mean, I was only asking!!!!!!
Janie
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:51 pm
Also, I sent MSNBC an e-mail about using gossips as sources. You might look at where that article is posted, though it is on the front of the web page and it was on in the morning. MSNBC should be embarassed that they did what they did. It is still not true.
Andrea
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:56 pm
I will check it out, thanks, I figured it was reliable coming from MSNBC obvioulsy you cannot trust any sources these days….thanks again
BlessBrangelina
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:17 pm
Andrea,
It is taken out of context.
WHY would you believe this considering you have heard Angie talk about her kids in person.
Well I believe She was asked about all the children being from different countries and backgrounds…minorities I think they were getting at. How they get on.
And she said that actually Shiloh could be considered the minority because she is the only one with blond hair and blues eyes. She went to call her her:
“full of light and love” and her little love or something similar. I think it was CNN web interview.
MSNBC like all the other sites want to create controversy so they throw in Angie, Shiloh; does she doesn’t she…and voila! People hit their site/talk about their site. Advertising!
DISGRACEFUL-Yes. UNSCRUPULOUS-Yes. But it seems that where Angie and her kids are concerned nobody gives a shit. It’s as if its their given right to hit at her and hers.
Change your homepage or don’t visit MSNBC. Heck even CNN has done it, runaway with a false story and never corrected it (that am aware of).
LIGAYA do you remember the interview?
BlessBrangelina
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:24 pm
Andrea,
It is taken out of context. :)
WHY would you believe this considering you have heard Angie talk about her kids in person.
Well I believe She was asked about all the children being from different countries and backgrounds…minorities I think they were getting at. How they get on.
And she said that actually Shiloh could be considered the minority because she is the only one with blond hair and blues eyes. She went to call her her:
“full of light and love” and her little love or something similar. I think it was CNN web interview.
MSNBC like all the other sites want to create controversy so they throw in Angie, Shiloh; does she doesn’t she…and voila! People visit their site/talk about their site. Advertising!
DISGRACEFUL-Yes. UNSCRUPULOUS-Yes. But it seems that where Angie and her kids are concerned nobody gives a shit. It’s as if its their given right.
Change your homepage or don’t visit MSNBC. Heck even CNN has done it, runaway with a false story and never corrected it (that am aware of).
LIGAYA do you remember the interview?
ligaya
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:29 pm
That rumor is a distortion of what Angie said. Shiloh is no outcast in the Jolie-Pitt family. Really, truly, can we fans imagine that of Angelina? And that Brad would allow that to go on?
It didn’t come from the hard news side of MSNBC. That rumor came from the gossip side of MSNBC - under the banner, it clearly says “Entertainment/Gossip/The Scoop.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22205927/from/ET/. The wolf comes in sheep’s clothing - msnbc isn’t the only one that has this problem.
My rule of thumb is: if the source is a tab rag/tv show, or gossip column, assume it’s all/mostly wrong. If it says Angie has said/done something terribly wrong, assume it’s a lie, suspend judgment until I can check it out. Not that Angie can’t make mistakes and do no wrong. But she definitely deserves the benefit of a doubt, don’t you think? Why would we be upset every time something negative comes about Angelina? That’s 24/7.
I want to complain to MSNBC too. That derogatory stuff comes out under their name – which people trust as hard news.
madd
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:39 pm
F the tabloids. GG noms tomorrow.
sarah
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:55 pm
Guys, I am norvegian. And was wondering what ” a blob” means. That’s something angie said about Shiloh when she was a couple of months old.
marsala
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:58 pm
By Courtney Hazlett - MSNBC
The Scoop
updated 10:30 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 11, 2007
Courtney Hazlett - MSNBC
The Scoop
Poor Shiloh Jolie-Pitt. As it turns out, being the most genetically blessed child of the decade has its disadvantages. Her mom, Angelina Jolie, recently said that she feels Shiloh is top contender to be the family’s “outcast,” and that she has to be careful to not ignore Shiloh’s needs.
“(Shiloh) looks like Brad. It’s funny because she’s almost going to be the outcast in the family because she’s blonde and blue-eyed. I felt so much more for Madd, Zahara and Pax because they were survivors,” Jolie said. “Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born. But I’m conscious that I have to make sure I don’t ignore her needs, just because I think the others are more vulnerable.”
Sound familiar? It should, because Jolie recently lamented her daughter and the privileged womb from whence she came to the UK edition of Elle when she said, “I think I feel so much more for Madd and Zee because they’re survivors, they came through so much. Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born. I have less inclination to feel for her … I met my other kids when they were 6 months old, they came with a personality. A newborn really is this … Yes, a blob! … I don’t ignore her needs, just because I think the others are more vulnerable.”
Sophia
Dec 12, 2007 at 3:46 pm
I get the feeling - I could be wrong - that she isn´t feeling so close to Shiloh as to the others, in particular Maddox and Zahara. And this has nothing to do with the tabloids. I had the feeling even before Shiloh was born. Just the way she never was into having biological children. And when I look at photos of her and Shiloh - she looks at her in a very friendly way, and obviously loves her, but a certain closeness is missing. She never BEAMS at Shiloh the way she does with the others. And in fact, she said so herself - that she had to make a conscious effort to feel so much for Shiloh as for the others. This might have been distorted and over-valued, but the words were there, and must come from somewhere. I have no idea whether or not she was telling the truth, or whether my impression is right, but it feels that way for me. Does any of you feel the same?
I´m not trying to run anybody down. Just trying to voice my impressions, and also daring to voice something that could offend some as criticism. But I really just wanted to know if it was just me that got that “vibe” (completely independently from the tabloids which I don´t even read anyway).
Passerby
Dec 12, 2007 at 3:58 pm
http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2007&mon=09&evt=angelina-shiloh&pic=07-angelina-shiloh-toy-shopping.jpg
Old pic but beyond cute.
I personally believe that if Angie is capable of loving someone that she didn’t have then she is VERY capable of loving someone she did have.
I think what she meant by shiloh has experienced less hardships then the other kids and that it puts a smile on their face seeing them happy. Shiloh will have her own hardships that when she overcomes them Angie will be beaming brightly.
That’s what I think. And its not to put down Sophia’s view.
dianad1968
Dec 12, 2007 at 4:53 pm
sophia, if everything you did and said was dissected the way it is for angie, you would go stark staring mad.
with that said, the words angie used were that she tends to “feel” more for her adopted children because of how rough their starts in life were in comparison to shiloh, who was wanted, prepared for and loved before she was born. “FEEL” in this instance, means to empathise with, feel sorry for a person/persons dire circumstances.
i have seen pictures of angie kissing her younger daughter, and relating to her very lovingly. it pains me that fans of angie have to keep apologising for her, and in so doing comes across so defensively, but i will keep on defending her because i think it is so unfair how this woman is targeted so relentlessly, while other celebrities get away with saying and doing similar things.
angie did not think she would ever have bio children, but she met and fell in love with brad and changed her mind. people have a change of heart all the time. nothing sinister about that.
i am not trying to attack anyone, and have not been posting recently because my patience is wearing very thin and i had to take a little break for my sanity.
anamanzana
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:06 pm
Hello all JP fans here at Pittwatch. Firstly, I’d like to say, thanks for the gentleness here…I’ve read some of what happens on other sites, and I’m appalled at the mean-spiritness that goes on, not only towards the JP family, but to each other upon disagreeing. So, I am compelled to post to Sarah regarding the “blob” comment. It’s a common term used in the Mom circles to describe the first 3 months after birth when all the baby does is sleep, eat & poop. When their vision becomes more clear and they can imitate interactions (usually at 3 months) they become WAY MORE FUN!!! Gwen & Angie tossed the term around, and unfortuneately, in an interview, AJ used the reference and all hell broke loose.
The way I see the adopted vs the bio child debate, is that people who’ve never adopted are hard pressed to understand how one could love children from other mothers as much as “their own”…however, we’ve seen the JPs enfold them as their own. My opinion is that Shiloh is so young to be in the papz sight, and they are protecting her. There may be a slight bit of AJ seeing too much of herself in Shiloh and quite possibly being afraid of it. However, she has said in interviews that Shiloh is her light and her love, and there’s no doubt in my mind of the JPs commitment to their family….ALL OF THEM!!!!
ligaya
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:21 pm
Thank you, Anamanzana. One clarification - in that interview, Angelina never uttered the word “blob” (I read the interview, I’m sure it can be found on google). The interviewer was the one who said “blob.”
Like you said, Gwen used the term, and as Lainey reminded, was never crucified for it the way Angelina was.
In my experience, parents often use terms which seem unkind but in a loving way, like the woman standing & rocking her baby for hours to sleep singing a sweet lullaby and calling her a little devil/satan.
My husband called our youngest “pumpkin-head” for his first couple of years - so far, no problems for our 31 y.o.
dianad1968
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:24 pm
angie with shiloh.
ahttp://i2.tinypic.com/822w9s9.jpgngie with shiloh
dianad1968
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:28 pm
lets try this again. i am a doofus when it comes to posting links. lol.
http://i2.tinypic.com/822w9s9.jpg
ligaya
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:36 pm
P.S. In our internet world, it only takes a millisecond for distortions & untruths to circle the globe and be taken as gospel truth. Unfortunately, even reliable media with journalistic ethics & standards will repeat/reprint/broadcast things they haven’t fact-checked. They don’t bother fact-checking because the news cycle is so speeded up now that they don’t want to take the time and then be scooped by their competition.
It’s like that game of telephone (?) - the one where each person whispers something to another one in a chain and the end message often has nothing whatsoever in common with the beginning message.
ligaya
Dec 12, 2007 at 5:39 pm
About Danni Mylogue, as I remember the first report, she was just kidding and revealing her crush on Brad. Now it’s reported that she said this seriously - much ado about nothing to rev up sales/ratings/clicks on websites.
anamanzana
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Ligaya, You’re so right…I was remembering BP and AJ speaking out during AMH interviews about journalists and their responsibility to research and report the truth and how that quality seems to be lost these days. Thanks for your input and accuracy. LOL!
angela
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:06 pm
anamanzana, i agree with you when you said “there may be a slight bit of AJ seeing too much of herself in Shiloh and quite possibly being afraid of it.”
it’s kinda true.
Mary Ann
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:18 pm
No wonder we have not seen Shiloh in a long time. I would protect my child from this garbage also. Agree with the others, we have all called our children or grandchildren crazy little names. It doesn’t mean we don’t love them. The JoliePitts love all their children.
wtf
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:39 pm
i call my kids monkeys at times…oops…will those parent police be coming over and crucify me?????
Sherry
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:45 pm
I’m with all of you - I’ve frequently called my kids monsters when they’re having less than charming moments. Even when they were little babies, such as, “oh my god I’m so tired, this little monster has been up all night!” I certainly don’t say it because I don’t love my kids. Sheesh.
And when it comes to Danni Minogue, knowing the media, I truly believe that it’s something taken totally out of context. She was probably confessing to a celeb crush of some sort and made a joke about how she’ll just break them up and move into his life. Again, many people say things like that and it isn’t meant to be taken seriously, but the media will grab the most innocuous things and turn them into something ridiculous.
Susie
Dec 12, 2007 at 8:51 pm
Sherry, I just love your site. The fans here are kind, gentle, mindful and respectful to each other when expressing ourselves, unlike other sites that are vile and vicious. All these negative articles re. Angie and Shiloh are so distorted, in my opinion. Madd, Z, and Pax are orphans from very hard and sad backgrounds and of course Angie really “feels” for them. She has seen firsthand how hard life is in their birth countries. I bet their mothers never had pre-natal care and so the kids struggled and were disadvantaged even in the womb. Because Angie is a very compassionate human being, she is trying to give them the extra nurturing they didn’t have so that they can at least have the foundation to grow up to be strong despite their sad pasts. They’re vulnerable because of their fragile backgrounds. This doesn’t mean she loves Shiloh any less–after all, Shiloh hasn’t had the struggles and hardships her brothers and sisters endured (hence the word “privileged”). I just don’t see Angie neglecting or casting Shiloh aside like those articles are claiming. Not our Angie. Her heart is way too big (Brad too!) and they’re way smarter parents than that!
angela
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:04 pm
guys, was the second part of the interview already aired? i wasn’t able to watch it. :(
ligaya
Dec 14, 2007 at 7:21 am
Showbiz Tonight has a segment tonight, Friday, 12/14/07, on “transformations” good & bad - looking at Brad, Ben Affleck & Britney. Angelina would have been a good one too.
Molly
Dec 14, 2007 at 8:41 am
dianad1968, wow! BRAVO!!! Feels great, doesn’t it. How come I only saw your links today but seems those were dated 2 days back?
Don’t let those negativity get you or any fans down. What I do these days is go and view this great “creation” by Cliniqua @ jjb megapost. It is accessible on page 1005. Somewhere on the upper portion, click on a link to her post and viola, for me the most hilarious smackdown. She’s the master par excellence. After you view that, you’ll understand why I’m not providing a direct link!
Molly
Dec 14, 2007 at 5:01 pm
Oops, now it is on page 1004.
ligaya
Dec 14, 2007 at 11:42 pm
Extra has a feature online about hottest PDAs in 2007. http://extratv.warnerbros.com/ People can say in the comments who they think had hottest PDAs in 2007. I said Brad & Angelina, natch. (The first post said B&A were fake.)
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: