Pittwatch.com: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie Gossip

87 opinions for Shiloh Jolie-Pitt “Most Influential Infant” says Forbes

• Kevin
  Dec 14, 2007 at 10:19 am

  I know you won’t post this, because unlike real people who value others opinions, unless we don’t “worship” these two, postings don’t get posted on your site. I’m not a Brangelina hater, but the last interview Angie gave was VERY disappointing. How can all of you as “moms” even relate to her latest “run of the mouth”. She’s beautiful, talented, and more, but this latest interview was a REAL downer. Shiloh will have to read this one day…how sad is that. See interview below:

  Angelina said: “She looks like Brad. It’s funny because she’s almost going to be the outcast in the family because she’s blonde and blue-eyed.”

  The 32-year-old actress also revealed she feels “more” of a connection to her adopted children Maddox, six, Pax, three, and two-year-old Zahara, than she does to “privileged” 18-month-old Shiloh.

  Angelina explained to Look magazine: “I felt so much more for Madd, Zahara and Pax because they were survivors.

  “Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born.

  “But I’m conscious that I have to make sure I don’t ignore her needs, just because I think the others are more vulnerable.”

  (she has to make a CONSCIOUS effort not to ignore Shilo’s needs..she just lost my vote as a supporter)

• tenika
  Dec 14, 2007 at 10:36 am

  This Is Very Cute :) But Their Time And Research Could Have Gone 2 Something A Little More Important I Think

• Sherry
  Dec 14, 2007 at 10:47 am

  Kevin - perhaps you should read the previous threads where this has been discussed ad nauseum. Never mind that it’s a rather OLD interview.

  I guess I’m a bad mother too - my youngest child was so easy-going as a baby (less so now that she’s two and more expressive) that I tended to focus on my oldest who was having a hard time adjusting to a new sibling. I also had to remind myself to keep from forgetting my baby not because I’m a horrible piece of crap but because she was laid back and was content to just lie around.

  Also, many people seem to misunderstand what is meant by “I feel for”. Feel for and love are not the same thing. I myself FEEL for children you see on Saturday morning television, the kids in third world countries sitting in the dirt eating a few grains of rice. I feel for them because they have hardships; I don’t need to feel for my own kids that way because their biggest hardship of the day might be that I said they can’t have another damn cookie until tomorrow. I FEEL more for those underprivileged kids but I obviously don’t LOVE them more.

  Further perspective - I feel for my oldest who had two surgeries to correct an eye problem when she was just a little thing. I don’t need to feel for my youngest who did not have the same surgery. Yet I love them both equally.

  People who dislike Brad and/or Angelina say that we can only see things in a skewed and positive glow. That seems to work both ways because people who have already decided they don’t like either of these two will only ever follow the negative tabloid headlines.

  And how can we “moms” align with Angelina? Because we’re not freakin’ June Cleaver, that’s why. It’s people like you who create this Virgin Mary/Mother Teresa persona for motherhood who cause a lot of mothers to never want to reveal their actual human side.

• tenika
  Dec 14, 2007 at 10:54 am

  Kevin I Respect Your Opinion But I Truly Believe People Are Taking This Out Of Context. Mad, Z And Pax Come From Countries Plagued With Poverty. Shiloh Was Not. I Believe She Just Wants 2 Make Sure The Other 3 Dont Feel Different In The Family. As They Get Older They Will Realize That They Are Minorities And Angie Wants Them 2 Feel Like They Have Self Worth Now While Theyre Young. Because Shiloh Will Not Have 2 Deal With These Issues She Has 2 Remind Herself 2 Be Conscious Of Shiloh And Her Feelings But Trust Me This Is A Woman Who Loves All Of Her Children. I Hope My Explanation Makes Sense 2 U

• Loren
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:03 am

  I don’t believe this is a real quote from Angelina, or a real article either; a made up one to sell magazines. I agree with tenika about a better use of time and research.

• quiet no more
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:11 am

  Bravo Sherry! Well said indeed.

  To Kevin or anyone for that matter can you imagine how the other kids will feel when in articles they will probably encounter when they are older they will read headlines such as: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have one daughter and three adopted children?

  The reality is, as has been said many many times we don’t know what they’re lives are like. Words are taken out of context all the time by the press.

  There is no such thing as perfection and for some reason people feel the need to compare her to it. It’s a losing comparison afterall she is only human.

• irma
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:22 am

  I agree with Sherry & Loren. Usually, tabloids twisted the words from Ange’s mouth, I feel for the children of the third world countries but love my children as much I care for others. I can’t understand why people see & remember a lot of negatives written about Ange but never research the facts. I believe she loves her children equally, regardless if either biological child or adopted. For God’s sake, Shi is her & Brad’s own blood, how can she not love her as much as the other children?

• Enya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:26 am

  Kevin,

  those are exactly my thoughts. I red the article too and could not understand why would Angelina say those terrible things about her own child? I have a great respect for her work as a humanitarian. She is a smart woman, who knows what to say in public. That interview MUST be made up, probably with the intention to harm her. At least I hope so.

• b5media - Celebrities and Their Busy Lives
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:36 am

  […] Shiloh’s got style […]

• tenika
  Dec 14, 2007 at 12:36 pm

  Kevin And All The Others With Negative Comments - There Are Literally DOZENS Of Celebrity Gossip Sites Where U Can Spread All The Negativity U Want. This, However, Is A Fansite And Your Comments Are Not Appreciated Nor Needed. Have A Blessed Day

• Cattie
  Dec 14, 2007 at 12:36 pm

  Angelina does not have to feel any way if she indeed made that comment. Those are her feelings and Ang & Brad will explain to Shiloh when she gets older what she actually meant not what the tabs want you to believe.

  Shiloh will have understood by then because she will probably have the same compassion for human beings as her parents do.

  The article is nice but it does’nt mean anything and might just rile some other celeb mothers and their fans.

• allaboutme
  Dec 14, 2007 at 1:18 pm

  This was from a RECENT interview!!! Get your facts straight! She recently reiterated thiese comments people!

• Janie
  Dec 14, 2007 at 1:32 pm

  Not new, not true.

• Loren
  Dec 14, 2007 at 2:36 pm

  In the venice picture of all four of the JP children, they all look very secure to me and in that particular picture Shiloh looks like she’s a Handful ( I am sure they all are). Brad and Angie are well adjusted, sane people, who can’t help but love all their children. To all the fans and Sherry have a happy holiday; Sherry thanks for a very wonderful site and your work in keeping fans informed about our favorite family.

• cee
  Dec 14, 2007 at 2:36 pm

  allaboutme Try to find a JA site. You are way off base here. We don’t believe the lies and made up quotes attributedto Angie or Brad.

• anamanzana
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:10 pm

  Hello to everyone here at Pittwatch…and again, thanks to Sherry who puts up with all of us - I love your work!!! I went onto Chaos Theory site and could see more of who you are. Very enjoyable.
  My opinion about the confusion related to the comments that AJ makes is that she is so candid, AND NOT MAINSTREAM that she is often misinterpreted, and then because she belongs to the hottest couple on the planet, anything about them will be read and yes, even devoured. So, the media exploits this. These comments were (sort of) made a very long time ago, and are simply being run again to tear her down after all the GREAT publicity that Brad put out in the past few weeks with MAKE IT RIGHT. He not only made it right with the Pink Houses, but he told all of America that his emotional tie to AJ came AFTER MMS. It’s the old classic story - wherever there is light - dark is attracted. Hold the Jolie-Pitt Family in the light, and have the hope that they can continue to do the good work — quit looking for the dark cloud — enjoy the beauty of the parade! Yes, perhaps Shiloh will read this interview one day, and because she has the caring parents she was born to, they will fully explain the reality, (they will all laugh about it) and she will indeed know the life of tabloids and be able to think critically about it.

• gena
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:30 pm

  KEVIN, GET IT REAL HONEY. IF IT’S IN LIFE AND STYLE OR IN TOUCH MAGAZINE, IT IS ALL LIES. BY THE WAY I AM SO MUCH INFLUENCE BY SHILOH, THAT SHE IS THE PICTURE IN MY DESKTOP AND I KISS HER EVERY TIME I OPEN MY COMPUTER. I ALWAYS TELL HERE THAT SHE HAS SUCH GREAT AND LOVING PARENTS, WHO LOVE HER AND HER BROTHERS AND SISTER VERY VERY MUCH.

• Sophia
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:42 pm

  Oh pleeeeez, cee! I can´t stand this referral to a JA site anymore. Do you think that anybody who offers a critical voice is automatically a JA fan? You are using JA as a means of insult.
  I hate that polarising. If Brad Pitt loved her for seven years, and has now loved AJ for three, then that should mean they must both be nice ladies, right? At least, that´s what I gather, being a BP fan. I don´t think he´d be involved with someone not nice. So - why the divide?
  And apart from that - why should someone who does not like AJ automatically like JA? Where is the logic? Sheesh.
  I wish this would stop.

  On another topic, Sherry, could you shine some light on this matter? I, too, believe that this is a recycled interview, because some sentences are exactly the same. Also, I don´t think AJ would repeat sentences that aggravated people so much. And yet, there are new sentences in between - which would mean the magazine made them up? Do you have any facts about this presumed new interview (which sounds like the old one)?

• Neela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:53 pm

  Kevin ought to know that particular article came from The Daily Mail, an effing British tabloid, and Brit tabs are worse than American ones.

  Kevin, I think you need to step down a bit from that high pulpit and be sure your source is actually solid if you’re gonna be citing that. It’s quite annoying that this same thing has been rehashed.

  And way to go Sherry.

• sunshine
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:55 pm

  To Sherry, you are absolutely correct that does make you a bad mother. Just because a baby is laid back, as you put it, does not mean that it does not to be touched and cuddled with. It is beyond words when I hear people talk openly about caring for one child moreso than another. they all came from you, and I do not care if one is a choir boy and the other talks throughout the choir, I will love them equally. But you have given me little insight on why you can identify with Angelina, because it allows you to justify your actions through her non parenting actions. Baby, let me tell you something, you need to consider getting another hero to idolize, seems as if her bad ways are not isolated. Time will tell you if that calm cool bab will not be affected by momies love. Also you may try readind the psychology book the developmental stages of Erikson, it talks about good turn out and bad turn out of children based on their very own personal interactions.

  The very first one is trust vs mistrust. Baby cries, if a baby needs are being met immediately then that baby will grow up to have a certain amount of trust to those around them.

• Neela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:55 pm

  allaboutyou, it’s not from a recent interview. the piece of bleep you’re citing is from a british tab. go figure. but alas, you’re all over it, totally inclined to believe it.

• Neela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 3:59 pm

  Wow, some people here are so bloody sanctimonious and judgmental. Sunshine, you don’t know Sherry, and the little insight she gives you into her life makes her an automatically awful mother to you? Oy vey.

• mayka
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:03 pm

  I did read somewhere about it being a recent interview. So assuming she did say those words, and in a more recent interview, I will agree that they were a poor choice of words, and she could have said in a different way because those words can so easily be taken out of context. HOWEVER, that aside, I personally don’t think her intention was to say to the whole wide world that she loves Madd, Pax and Z more than she could ever love Shi.

  She probably feels a bit more the need to compensate and feel more for the 3 kids because of the circumstances surrounding their birth, compared to Shi, but I don’t think it necessarily means she loves Shi any less.

  Accordingly, she herself said she makes sure that she does not ignore the needs of Shi simply because she feels the others are more vulnerable (does not equate to her saying that they’re more valuable or precious to her).

• Lis
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:07 pm

  sunshine doesn’t seem like the kind to know much about psychology. aren’t psych nurses supposed to be understanding, not patronizing and judgmental??? or maybe she is the type from one flew over the cuckoo’s nest . . .

• jenna
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:12 pm

  This isn’t the only site that didn’t post that article. Not even the major blogs put them up . . .possibly coz that pseudo interview came from a British rag, it’s same trash that’s being rehash by that rag, and oh yes, back to number one, it never happened.

• Sherry
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:19 pm

  Sunshine, if you care to insult me personally, you can be banned.

  I never said I didn’t hold her. If you knew where to find me on the internet besides this site, you’d see pictures that show my youngest as a baby being held in my arms, being carried around in a sling or baby bjorn, with me all the time. What I was saying is that unlike my first born, she didn’t need to be constantly rocked or fussed over. She was more content with her surroundings whereas my oldest was colicky and hated being put down even long enough for me to park my butt on a toilet to pee.

  And you may be confused. I didn’t ignore my baby or abuse her or neglect her. Based on how attached she is to me at the age of two and the love she gives back to me with the same intensity that I give to her, I’d say I definitely didn’t neglect her.

  But you think you know me. It must be fun to hide behind a pretend name like sunshine (how ironic a name!) and insult me and my parenting when you don’t know me.

  You must be the world’s biggest saint in the world, congratulations to you, I’m sure you live the perfect life.

• quiet no more
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:21 pm

  wow a can of worms has been opened.

  love is love people we all do the best we can and instead of such negativity we should be helping each other up.

  It’s the holiday season lets try and be kind to one another.

• Lis
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:24 pm

  sunshine’s spreading her nurse hatchet glow.

• Sherry
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:25 pm

  Also? Don’t quote to me about a baby crying and needing to have needs met. My children - both of them - never cried as babies. The longest they would cry was the amount of time it took me to walk down the hall if I was still up. If I wasn’t up, then I was in bed in the same room as them. My oldest cried because of colic but not because I was ignoring her. I didn’t do cry it out.

  But again, it only shows that you come to this site and get all negative about everything but you? You know absolutely nothing about me. And I don’t need someone on the internet to tell me what kind of parent I am. I only need my kids and my husband telling me that they think I’m a great mom. Anyone else can worry about themselves.

• ligaya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:28 pm

  sunshine, please stuff it. You should change your name to doomandgloom or maybe deliberatelyclueless. Where do you come off telling Sherry she’s a bad mother? What qualifies you to be judge & jury? Are you a mom? You have no right to tell anybody anything so personal and judgmental.

• dianad1968
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:43 pm

  allaboutme
  Dec 14, 2007 at 1:18 pm

  NO, SHE DID NOT. angie made the comments that she “feel more” for maddox and zahara very early in the year. the other comment they are attributing to her never happened. they just made that up because they know that people who do not like her willl believe. and they were so right.
  i am so tired about the continuing drama over this “feel more” for comment. she did not say she loved shiloh less than her other children. she said she feels more for them, meaning empathise more for them, sympathise with them because of
  how difficult their beginnings were in this life. “love” and “feel” have two very different meanings. and i know the detractors know this, but they use it to continue with their hatred for this woman. when will it end.
  someone said on JJ that all of this is because angie chooses to love ALL of her kids equally, with no difference between adopted and bio, and because these people who are raising this ruckus cannot imagine loving a child they did not give birth to, they think angie hates her shiloh. despite several interviews she has given to the contrary. please, can anyone really see angie using the expression “outcast” to describe ANYONE much less her daughter.

• ligaya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:47 pm

  Yes, tis the season supposed to be of love, peace & goodwill towards men (and women). It should be that the whole year around.

  But I don’t think that means we accept insults and abuse verbally and physically. We do have a responsibility to defend ourselves and those in our care who are vulnerable. That’s what Brad’s Make It Right is about, in an extreme case - that’s what Darfur is about, and Angie’s UNHCR & Global Action for Children.

  There are bullies in the world (a lot of them seem to be hiding out in the internet), there are evil people. Didn’t Jesus whip those money-lenders to drive them out of the temple?

  To ignore evil is to become an accomplice to it. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

• dianad1968
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:54 pm

  i am going to make a statement, and please dont take it the wrong way, but i am so happy to see the rigorous defending of angie here today. not rude and vulgar, but not overly polite either. it needed to be done. sherry, kudos to your comments above. after a time you lose all patience with the continuing negativity.

  i am convinced they have been on a campaign to break up brad and angie, because somehow, that will bring honor to his ex-wife, and because it is not happening they are becoming more desperate and vicious. these people are beyond hateful.

  you know i am not a fan of his ex, but that doesn’t mean i believe what is written about her in the tabloids. some of you should try practising critical thinking.

• Lis
  Dec 14, 2007 at 4:55 pm

  ligaya, isn’t sunshine the same person who conducted a bit to bit analysis on brangie’s red carpet premier appearance? hahaha. she is just another close-minded, pompous know-it-all who makes psychological references to make her appear “right.” maybe she enjoys disseminating her noxious glow. i may be being judgmental too but i’m not saint and nurse hatchet has really dug herself a big a-whoopin’ hole.

• dianad1968
  Dec 14, 2007 at 5:16 pm

  ^^^^ this same magazine fabricated a story about brad’s ex-wife meeting shiloh, and some other nonsense, and her publicist denied that she had ever given them an interview. so they have a history of lying, especially when it comes to this stupid “triangle”, and further whipping the
  flames.

  sherry, you should really think about banning sunshine. its one thing to come here with her constant hateful comments about angie, but another all together when she starts insulting you directly. i often wonder if these people’s skeletons were to see the light of day, how would they withstand the scrutiny. somehow i think they would buckle.

• tenika
  Dec 14, 2007 at 5:53 pm

  AS I STATED B4 THIS IS A FANSITE!!! U DONT HAVE ANYTHING GOOD 2 SAY ABOUT BRAD AND ANGIE OR OUR WEBMISS U CAN GO SOMEWHERE ELSE

• ligaya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 5:56 pm

  Just to lighten things up a bit, Newsweek has a web exclusive interview with Brad: http://www.newsweek.com/id/77962/page/1. It’s fun & funny. Brad talks of not becoming Senator Pitt, Mom, Jerry Lewis, singing, Xanax & kids.

  Little Pink Houses

  Brad Pitt’s latest production is an attempt to make things right for Katrina’s still-suffering survivors.

• ligaya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 5:58 pm

  Newsweek has a web exclusive interview with Brad: http://www.newsweek.com/id/77962/page/1.

  (rest under moderation)

• Neela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 6:06 pm

  I actually agree with Sophia on the whole AJ-JA debacle. I’m not a fan of JA, and I do find her a tad uninteresting, but I don’t dislike her either. I think having the divide only heightens the hate/combat between the AJ and JA camps. At the same time, because I don’t care for JA (and even if I wind up disliking her), I don’t make snide remarks against her. It’s either spend 50% of my energy hating or spend it doing something positive.

  Sophia, I think cee and most of us on here are just tired with the constant toxic comments from allabouther. Again, Angie’s a big feature in this site. It’s still a part Angie blog site. That’s just how it is. Otherwise, I don’t think many AJ fans would be here. I know you don’t like it, but just try to let it go. :)

• Neela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 6:19 pm

  Also, all of us here should consider this: even if the interview happened, it doesn’t mean it was transcribed accurately. That is, at the end of the day, it is still the editor and the writer who have the power to edit words (in their zine/paper) in a certain manner, take things out of context so as to rouse the public’s interest. And sure enough it is working. So, we should really be more wise about what we read. And again, the supposed interview came from The Daily Mail—it’s a tab.

• Stacy...
  Dec 14, 2007 at 6:47 pm

  This isn’t even an interview and she never said the ‘outcast’ comment…the publication this came from is a british tabloid named ‘Look’ Magazine. They are notorious for making up ‘interviews’ and attributing them to the celebrity. The other stuff is taken from the Elle UK article that came out in February. She didn’t RE-ITERATE anything. This particular tabloid took words from other places and threw in a sentence or two of their own for their fan fiction. Simple as that. It’s funny though, with some of the other reputable positive interviews and articles that have come from overseas get very LITTLE play with those who like to criticize. Wonder why that is.

  P.S. ‘Look’ did the same thing in August this year about Jennifer Aniston meeting Shiloh at some restaurant. Her publicist (as always) came out and called bullshit on the story. The difference between then and now? Angelina doesn’t employ a publicist and obviously cares less about what the tabs write.

• anamanzana
  Dec 14, 2007 at 7:03 pm

  RE: Newsweek article. I’d be embarrassed to write my name on that by line. What a waste.

• maxie
  Dec 14, 2007 at 8:02 pm

  Sherry,
  You do not need to explain yourself to these people. Some people, like sunshine and kevin, like to stand on the sidelines and criticize. They do not have the guts to actually do. They sound like they do not even have children. As for the “nurse” she sits on her mountain giving out “advice” without knowing a d#@*! thing.
  They cannot stand to see people saying nice things about AJ so they come to this site to try and ruin it, with lies.
  Like always we will all out last them.

• maxie
  Dec 14, 2007 at 8:15 pm

  WOW, my first time needing moderation. Is this like a webby timeout?

• angela
  Dec 14, 2007 at 8:37 pm

  time out guys!

  why don’t we congratulate shi - shi for bagging Forbes most influential infant. way to go shiloh!

  let’s forgive and forget guys, it’s the holiday season.

  world peace :)

• Mary Ann
  Dec 14, 2007 at 9:17 pm

  Ligaya I think Sunshine is really Lori. It has been a while since we have heard from her, but boy this sure sounds like her.
  About the remarks to Sherry that is kicking below the belt. I had 3 children, now all in their 40’s. My middle child kind of got lost in the shuffle. His older brother and younger sister required alot of attention for numerous reasons. And believe me he was always so happy just amusing himself. And he certainly has grown up to be a great human being, husband and father.
  Angelina loves all her children.

• irma
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:01 pm

  Let’s spread the word of God. Love one another. Peace.

• ligaya
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:34 pm

  Extra has a feature online about hottest PDAs in 2007. http://extratv.warnerbros.com/ People can say in the comments who they think had hottest PDAs in 2007. I said Brad & Angelina, natch. (The first post said B&A were fake.)

• Jo
  Dec 15, 2007 at 2:25 am

  Wow, people! Where are all these negativities coming from? Are you people so unhappy with yourselves, or downright envious? Just a nice, “way to go” will do. Sherry is just sharing the news of the distinction Forbes has bestowed on the unwitting Shiloh. (I dare you to misinterpret what I just wrote…isn’t that how some mind works…they’d think I mean Shiloh is dumb…when I simply meant she didn’t even ask for it, totally unconcious and innocent of her title).

  With all due respect, Kevin…you are a guy, am I right? So forgive me if I say, there is no way you will be able to relate nor can you be so self-righteous about Motherhood. And Sunshine…exactly how many kids have you brought into this world or raised? Because if you have at least more than one kid, you’ll know you can’t love all your kids the same because they are individuals with their own distinct personalities and needs.

  When I first read that article by Elle UK on Angelina I didn’t find it offensive. I understood where she was coming from. Maybe because I have a friend with a special child and she needed to remind herself to make sure she meets the need of her “normal” child as well. It’s no different really. It didn’t mean she loved one child less. Angie’s concern was valid since she had adopted first and didn’t seem sure in the first place if she should be a mom because of all the “darkness” in her in the past. Maddox gave her the confidence to become a Mom. Of course it’s not like I was there, but since Angie is so candid in her interviews (the legitimate ones like Vogue for instance and the one with James Lipton in Inside the Actor Studio) it was out of love for Brad that gave her the courage to try and get pregnant. And anyone who is a mom can relate to the surreal feeling of being a first time mom and being handed this “blob” for that first time. And by blob I’m pretty sure Angie meant that Shiloh was this little thing, guileless, innocent and still to be molded, and shaping her character.

  Sherry and Angie….for what it’s worth…God knows how hard it is to be a mother (biological or otherwise)…The only opinions that will matter, at the end of the day, are those of your children. Who cares if our children are the only ones who know that in spite of our shortcomings we are great mothers? Still, the proof is in those very kids themselves. The kind of adults they turn out to be will be testament enough. One thing for sure they won’t be posting ignorant remarks in any website….Peace!

• maryj
  Dec 15, 2007 at 4:03 am

  I don’t always believe magazines but I’m still quite disappointed in what she said. The fact that she is human, there could be some resentment towards this child. So she was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and she looks like her father. What did she expect? That wasn’t Shiloh’s fault. If that bothered her so much she should have just kept adopting. I’m a great fan of this family, I too hope she just said the wrong thing. There are many hollywood stars that didn’t have good relationships with their mothers. Remember “mommy dearest”.

• Bee
  Dec 15, 2007 at 4:45 am

  Hey, can’t believe whats going on here. Its getting real personal. So please calm down and do NOT take any comment personal. It doesnot make sense to bring it on a personal level other then to get into an argument!!

  I think we are all Fans or at least respect Angie and Brad for their work. I fully agree with Mayka. I think Angie loves her children equaly. All words from interviews can be twisted and twisted so long untill you get out of them what you want, no one knows what she is thinking. But if you look on pictures of Angie the kids you see that she loves all of them. Thats what matters and not the words she said in an old interview.

• TOO CRAZY
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:19 am

  Wow… I just came across the life and style site for the first time, I didn’t know they had one. Anyway they’ve got a Where’s Shiloh counter at the top, counting the days, hours, minutes and seconds since they last saw her. Jeez, FREAKS!! Man I can’t get over how obsessed it makes them look. Seriously. Wow. Total total scary weirdos

• fan
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:24 am

  i really doubt this article is true -it’s from a british tabloid-unless you read the tabloids i guess you would believe it-shiloh has two parents and they owe no one on this board or any where else an explanation on how they raise their children or how they feel about them-there is NOTHING anyone can do to angie or brad about their children-enjoy the family like we all do,but remember none of us are related to this family-peace

• Neela
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:27 am

  maryj, try not to be too disappointed. just read what mayka wrote up there. she makes a whole lot of sense. angelina did not say she doesn’t love shilo any less. i think if you really have to read into this so-called interview, angelina’s trying to relay that her love for all of them is equal. i think she’s just aware of what could have happened to the older children had she and brad not taken them in, after all, she has seen the dire conditions in their motherlands. so, there’s a whole lot of sympathy there, but at the same time, just because her other children are more vulnerable, it doesn’t mean her love for shiloh is reduced. i think that’s what mayaka’s trying to explain. each child has a different need and a different background, so, in a way, angelina almost has to mold herself into each one of her children’s situations and at the same time, be sure that each child gets her equal love and attention. it’s all about trying to find a balance. my friend has two children, a boy and a girl, and in some ways she does treat them differently, but she loves them both equally. i think in all, angie’s doing a fine job as a mother. besides, none of us are privy to their lives. we only hear and read things, but we’re not even close to being a fly on their wall. anyway, people shouldn’t just jump into every story you hear out there. how many magazines have claimed to have interviewed angie? and again, like i said, at the end of the day, it is the editor and writer who have the power to manipulate the words that we read, hence, shaping what we believe in.

• fan
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:28 am

  bee, think there are some fake fans on this site-just read their comments-

• Neela
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:35 am

  Totally agree with you, Bee. I just feel bad that Sherry has had to explain herself to a stranger on the Internet, one who made a quick judgment and turned it too personal. This site has been rather fair considering the snarky anti-AJ/BP remarks that have been posted here.

• Children First
  Dec 15, 2007 at 5:35 am

  To quote:quiet no more
  Dec 14, 2007 at 11:11 am

  “There is no such thing as perfection and for some reason people feel the need to compare her to it. It’s a losing comparison afterall she is only human.”

  If we can remember that AND that unless we see a taped interview with Ms. Jolie actually SPEAKING the words attributed to her, then we CANNOT hang our critique onto the printed word from TABLOIDS. Come on people….you should know better.

  Anyone who is a fan should take the time to do some research. You’ll find that these comments were not made to this magzine, rather it was a cut and paste job to sell more mags and make money. Which by the way is exactly what is being pointed out by the FORBES list.

  Does anyone really believe the latest TAB headline “Where is SHILOH?” Do we really believe that she is in a dungeon somewhere banished because she is somehow not “felt” for enough? Do we really believe that the previous bruhaha about Zee was because the media cared one iota about her true origins? And how do you explain Pax? Headline grabbers much!?

  Thank you Sherry for your kind insight to the meaning of the phrase “feel for”. Fans and Sherry, ignore the pseudo intellectuals who pretend that there is some objective rationale behind their critique……their intent is obvious.

  BTW, I ENJOY and get a HUGE kick out of seeing this family, but I fear this obsession with little children. I wish the fans here and of course the JP family a wonderful holiday season. Peace.

• Neela
  Dec 15, 2007 at 6:50 am

  I did a little more digging, and the British magazine that’s claiming to have scored the supposed interview is called Look magazine, the same magazine that claimed (more like fabricated) to have interviewed JA, in which JA supposedly revealed that Brad had taken Shiloh to meet her. There you go. Even JA was targeted by that tab. And of course, tabs have to stick together. The Daily Mail even picked it up. Again, please be careful and wise about what we read.

• Children First
  Dec 15, 2007 at 7:01 am

  Since the topic du jour is about the youngest Jolie-Pitt children, I thought I’d share this again: remember ALL the children are loved and WANTED. Love is like being a “little bit pregnant!” Either you are loved or you are not….there is no “less or more than!” JMHO.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFMjzd-zGvY

• Cattie
  Dec 15, 2007 at 7:43 am

  Chin up Sherry, you owe this person ABSOLUTELY no explaination for your family life and how you live it.

  But when someone is talking utter nonsense about you or your family anyone with emotions would defend it.

  Your doing a wonderful job on this site and the fans luv your commitment, keep on doing what your doing.x

• irma
  Dec 15, 2007 at 8:20 am

  I agree 100 % percent to the fans that no personal attack is allowed here, that” hitting below the belt & out of line. We should all be thankful to Sherry for the work she is doing for all of us. I’m glad Sherry explain herself to clarify. One fan is wrong & should be corrected. Sherry, you are doing a great job.
  Ligaya : I voted for Brad & Ange .

• irma
  Dec 15, 2007 at 8:21 am

  I agree 100 % percent to the fans that no personal attack is allowed here, that hitting below the belt is out of line. We should all be thankful to Sherry for the work she is doing for all of us. I’m glad Sherry explain herself to clarify. One fan is wrong & should be corrected. Sherry, you are doing a great job.
  Ligaya : I voted for Brad & Ange .

• irma
  Dec 15, 2007 at 8:23 am

  Sorry, tried to correct what I wrote on my first comment & I clicked it to early. Have a nice weekend everyone. Remember, Brad on Regis & Kelly on Monday. Tuesday is Brad’s birthday.

• Chance
  Dec 15, 2007 at 9:15 am

  I hope this couple and their children are not #1 in everything every year. It’s getting boring when you already know the outcome.

• Sally
  Dec 15, 2007 at 9:16 am

  I was sad to see so much attention being paid to the children of celebrities. No wonder the parents are so worried about them. If people are that focused on their children it brings up the issue of how vulnerable they are and how important it is to keep them safe. I think we should adopt laws that protect children from this type of scrutiny. I believe Brad Pitt mentioned that in a recent interview.

  As for Angie’s comment…. well the controversy here is exactly what the media wants everyone to do…react. I think that is the purpose of these articles keep everyone stirred up and buying magazines. Sherry nailed it when she explained what she believed what Angie meant. Most of us would pay more attention to a special needs child for whatever reason rather then the one that doesn’t need us so much. Good for her (Angie) for realizing that and paying attention to make sure she doesn’t exclude Shiloh.

• Brit
  Dec 15, 2007 at 9:32 am

  Okay, I think this obsession with the kids is a little bit weird, but such is life.

  Everyone has personal issues that relate back to how they were raised. Angelina has said that she does not really trust anyone, even if her own mum would have done something to betray her.

  We could say: 1. they should not have got together because their lives will always be in the spotlight 2. she has a reputation as a man-stealer but now appears to have fallen totally and deeply in love with her soulmate 3. she will love those kids no matter what, to the best of her abilities, as we all do with our own.

  I am not an Angie fan. I respect her humanitarian efforts, but she is just another person, like everyone else.

  The gossip rags are just that and appear to be able to move copies due to enquriing minds!

  Her and Brad should just live their lives regardless, say very little about their family and maybe, one day, the world will be more focused on more important matters!

• dianad1968
  Dec 15, 2007 at 9:52 am

  neela, i remember when that tabloid story came out, and JA’s publicist came out with a denial that she had never given an interview to that magazine. why then can’t people figure out that if they lied once regarding this supposed “triangle” that the tabs insist on perpetuating, that they could lie again.

  and again, i ask the question, can you really see angie using the expression “outcast” to describe anyone much less her daughter, who she carried for nine months, and has said at the time of her birth, she just wanted to hear her cry.

  the problem a lot of the people who choose to believe this story are having is that they cannot understand how angie can love all of her children EQUALLY, because they could not love an adopted child as much as a biological child. but there are people who are capable of doing this, as we saw when larry king interviewed brad and quoted this man who said he had four children, two are adopted, he forgot which two.

  you know i fully believe that GOOD always wins over EVIL, and make no mistake what these tabloids are doing to this not perfect, but wonderful young woman, is an evil act. all of this hatred stems from the fact that brad divorced hsi wife for reasons none of us know, and chose to move on with his life with angie. i am sure he wishes JA the same for her life. it is more than time enough that all the naysayers do the same, and leave us fans of this couple to enjoy them and their work as we choose to. as brad recently stated, he thought all this would have ended a year ago.

  i cautioned in an earlier post that we had better be prepared for more of this kind of slander against angie, because she has had so many nominations for AMH. but i am sure we will continue to defend her vigorously. sorry for the long post. enjoy your saturday guys. will log on again later.

• Susan
  Dec 15, 2007 at 10:46 am

  This recent interview is a total fake. I know because i live here in England where this fake ass story originated from. It’s from look magazine and i read the whole thing in the supermarket for a laugh. This mag is a complete joke over here. The last angie story they had was that she and brad had split and angie went to the Australian premiere of A mighty heart during their trial seperation LOL. Those are the type of stories you get in look mag. They cannot even get an interview with c-list brit celebs let alone an interview with angelina. They have been torn into by so many celeb ’s reps for their made up stories. Angelina never ever said shiloh is an outcast and the feel for more comment is from elle last year. It’a a shame that even fans will believe something negative without checking the facts. Believe me this interview is the biggest load of rubbish i have ever read. National Enquirer is more reliable than this mag and that’s saying something.

• ligaya
  Dec 15, 2007 at 12:10 pm

  I now expect personal attacks on Sherry more often - not all the time, just enough to keep us riled up. That’s the trolls’ main goal, isn’t it? To divert our focus from the JPs? & to get caught up in their negativity?

  They know we’re going to defend Sherry, so they’ll stir up the pot every once in a while, like the evil goblins they are.

• Courtney
  Dec 15, 2007 at 1:51 pm

  SO CUTE! lol

• ligaya
  Dec 15, 2007 at 2:42 pm

  Shalom y paz, Pittwatchers! Time flies during the holidays, and it’s already the end of week 2 of the Make It Right/Pink Project. Today I read that $3.5 million of the $5 million to match Brad’s $5 million donation has been raised (http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071214/NEWS01/71214011). Awesome! That’s excellent news! That $3.5 million includes OUR donations – yay!

  The 1st week, 14 of us gave $2425 (!!!) + 5 gave unspecified amounts + 3 made pledges. Doesn’t it feel good? This 2nd week, Akishdebaba & Heather added $65 to our total = $2490 ($10 more dollars and we will have donated the equivalent of a roof solar panel to help cut 75% off energy bills for a lifetime). Actually, I’m sure we’re over $2500 because Ranch donated an unspecified amount. Thank you everyone – gracias, merci, salamat. Angelina & Brad & Maddox/Pax/Zahara/Shiloh would be so proud of us. The 10 houses paid for grew to 27! Celebrities who gave whole houses: Jimmy Buffett, Donna Karan, and the band Widespread Panic.

  If you’re a procrastinator like me, this might have slipped off your busy holiday agenda. I found this:

  Give Today
  Do it now. It is not safe to leave a generous feeling to the cooling influences of the world. - Thomas Guthrie

  Consider this advice on how you can help change the world. And just do it.

• anamanzana
  Dec 15, 2007 at 2:49 pm

  Light attracts light AND dark - it’s up to us to determine what action to take. May you all live in peace! Jolie-Pitts are a wonderful example of living one’s truth.

• irma
  Dec 15, 2007 at 11:21 pm

  I tried to donate to Make it Right a few days ago but then when they asked for the # at the back of my credit card I didn’t push it thru, I mean, I don’t know how safe the site is. I really like to donate not much but it will add up & it will help. I’m so proud of all the Jolie-Pitt fans, we are making a difference. I will donate tomorrow. Christmas is just around the corner. Been so busy at work. God bless you all specially the Jolie-Pitt Family.

• naty
  Dec 16, 2007 at 3:21 am

  Im not beleive that thre is interview for angelina that shiloh is an outcast in their family. all are lies! shes not like that they do that in order to sold out their magazines ad make negative comments againts angelina!soooh rediculous!

• Liz
  Dec 16, 2007 at 11:09 am

  JP fans just to remind you all, Regis and Kelly show tomorrow morning 17Dec07 Brad will be one of the guess. Let support him by watching the show. Pls check the time on your area. Congratulations Shi. Have a wonderful day to all.

• cristine
  Dec 17, 2007 at 10:56 am

  guys lets all try to ignore the haters/trolls. personally they were the reason i left this site for awhile. i get soo mad ‘cuz i love love angelina and as always these haters will try their very best to trash her then i fight back and say some nasty things and get a moderation! lol! i so respect sherry for what she’s doing to us fans but sometimes she’s tooo nice to this trolls! GODBLESSALLTHEFANSOFBRANGELINA!!!!!!!!!!!!

• cristine
  Dec 17, 2007 at 11:04 am

  okey my post awaiting moderation? what did i do now? lol! anywho guys accdg.to jj brad’s regis and kelly’s guesting will be shown next week monday 12/24. they taped it today he was seen in ny abc studio.

• BlessBrangelina
  Dec 17, 2007 at 11:23 am

  Thanks Cristine,

  I hurried up to sit and watch, they didn’t show him on the highlights…I was confused. Thanks for clearing that.

• BlessBrangelina
  Dec 17, 2007 at 12:49 pm

  “i think she’s just aware of what could have happened to the older children had she and brad not taken them in, after all, she has seen the dire conditions in their motherlands. so, there’s a whole lot of sympathy there, but at the same time, just because her other children are more vulnerable, it doesn’t mean her love for shiloh is reduced.” Neela

  Thanks that’s the clearest interpretation of what she originally said. IT is a very positive thing she said which encompassed the range of emotions she felt for ALL her children.

  There are people who want to believe the negative things, hence the pouncing “See she said that about her OWN daughter!! She’s not perfect.” It makes them feel better to point the finger at her, to try and destroy her.

  Anyone ever watched Fight Club??
  =The Narrator annihilates blondie in a fight. When asked why he said “I wanted to destroy something beautiful!”

  This is where the constant labelling of Angie as the embodiment of perfection is grounded. She has been set up to be hated by all insecure shiftless/directionless people…an easy target, it seems, for all that is wrong in their ’small’ worlds.

  Sherry, she is baiting you. We have seen your family and read your commentary. Unlike this person who ‘points fingers’ without benefit of prove.

• cristine
  Dec 17, 2007 at 12:56 pm

  you are most welcome BlessB! i miss you guys! my first post still on moderation???? i only said that we esp.me shld try to ignore the haters of angie and they were the reason i left this site for awhile! oh well.

• ligaya
  Dec 17, 2007 at 3:40 pm

  Cristine, I think “8ers” is one of those words which triggers automatic moderation. Too bad - it’s such a useful word to describe everything about them.

• cristine
  Dec 17, 2007 at 4:54 pm

  ligaya you’re right that word triggered auto mod in my post. sherry clarified thru e-mail. but really its the best description of them! lol! maybe i can use a tagalog word of it? watcha think ? lol joke only!

• ligaya
  Dec 19, 2007 at 11:47 am

  Cristine, sure, why not? I might stick to my “8ters” though. ;-)

  Here’s a present for everyone from one of the best Brangelina video artists on YouTube.

  ANGELINA JOLIE - MAGICAL WORLD
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cH1dTxsUocc

• A-M
  Jan 8, 2008 at 2:11 am

  Hi all,
  I’m new to this site but have been a Brangelina supporter from the beginning. I, too, agree with many of the comments re: haters, negativity (towards either JA or AJ), tabloid liberties, etc. The only thing I can’t agree with are about the merits of the kiddie pics - on one hand, I agree that constant stalkerazzi photops exposes them to greater danger, but on the other hand, where would I get my Shiloh (and Z!) fix? Shiloh=Most Beautiful Celebubaby Ever!!!! (and no, I’m not a hater for other celebubabies since I do think that Suri is a cutie, too, but there is something about Shi that renders me awed!

• maggie
  Feb 1, 2008 at 2:19 pm

  a-m y did u put (and z!) after shi!! evryone on this site always put shi before zee Y?? i dont get it zee to me is a very cute baby aswell! i no i often get jelouse of my little sis, if i was zee and read all these comments i wud fell soo second best! this is cumin frm a 12 year old! a proper exepert jealousy! “”oo wat wud i do with out my pics of shi” wat about zee
  one of the people has shi as there desktop photo WAT ABOUT ZEE!!!!

• Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie - Most Influential Couple
  Feb 11, 2008 at 7:15 pm

  […] like Shiloh Jolie-Pitt was listed as the most influential infant, Forbes.com has now declared Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie is […]

• LARY
  Jul 14, 2008 at 3:08 pm

  I WISH ANGIE PRODUCE MORE BEAUTIFUL BABIES. HOLLYWOOD NEED BEAUTIFUL STARS VERY RARE BEAUTIFUL STARS NOW. MOST IS FAKE., PLASTIC..ETC…

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: