The Jolie-Pitt kids create a bit of hotel chaos in London
February 11, 2009 by Sherry
Oops! It seems that while Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were attending the BAFTA Awards, the four older Jolie-Pitt kids were causing a bit of a ruckus back at the hotel.
According to the UK version of Marie Claire, the story is that Maddox, Pax, Zahara, and Shiloh were playing in the hallway on the third floor, which had been almost completely reserved for the family and the people traveling with them.
I’m not upset at the kids, because seriously, they’re ages two to seven. They’re children and at that age they just don’t really care about whether the noise they make is causing a disruption to other guests. They’re just trying to have fun together and they don’t realize they’re creating a scene.
I’m upset about two things with this story, assuming that it is indeed true. One, I’m annoyed with the nanny. Did she think they were in a park or a private home? She’s the adult and she should have known better than to let them run wild in the hall like that. The article mentioned:
But other guests weren’t amused.
One moaned: ‘They were running up and down the hallway for over an hour.
‘Their nanny tried to quieten them down and move them out the way when people came through.
‘But she had her hands full with the four of them.’
If the nanny realized that she had to get the Jolie-Pitt kids to be quiet and step out of the way for people, she should have realized they were being disruptive and it’s up to her to step up and find something more appropriate for them to do. It’s not very likely that a seven-year-old who is having a great time is going to suddenly stop and say, “hey guys, this isn’t a very good idea, let’s go inside and color instead!”
The other thing that upset me is something that doesn’t surprise me – I’ve seen other articles and blog posts where people are blaming Brad and Angelina for the behavior, and calling the kids wild, out of control, and spoiled.
First of all, how are Brad and Angelina to blame? They weren’t there! It’s not like they were locked inside, sleeping. They had gone out to attend an awards show. They were not responsible for what was going on at the hotel. If non-celebrity kids drew all over their living room walls because their babysitter was too busy watching TV or just didn’t care to stop them, no one would blame the parents who were out. But naturally, because it’s Brad and Angelina, people must blame them for something that happened when they weren’t even present.
Second, kids playing in the hallway and making a lot of nose are not wild, out of control, or spoiled. As I said, that just makes them KIDS. Kids want to run and play and have fun. If anyone has a kid who is two, three, five, or seven years old who would be happier to sit quietly in a chair than play games with their siblings, well lucky them. Most kids are not like that.
Hopefully Brad and Angelina spoke with the nanny after hearing what happened so that things won’t get so loud next time – but on the other hand, I think that’s why they tend to rent houses instead of hotel rooms when they can, because it cuts down on this sort of situation!
Image used with permission: Newscom
correction
The hotel has already denied this report as a tabloid story.
We shouldn’t believe UK Marie Claire. Yesterday I read new Japan Marie Claire story which says Brad had regretted marrying to Aniston soon after their wedding because he realized he was deceived by her good girl image. She is described as a bad wife.( In Japan Angie is very popular while Aniston is widely believed as a career ambitious ex wife)
This made me laugh because anyone with kids know that when you are staying at a hotel, kids tend want to try out everything from running in the hallway to pushing the buttons in the elevator to jumping on the beds.
seriously they need to find something else to write about…I am sure the same people writing this stuff have kids who run down the halls of hotels or other places…get in people’s way…and are chaotic. LOL
I don’t know whether or not to believe the story. On the one hand, I’ve never heard of this happening before, and it seems awfully suspicious that this is supposedly the first time they’ve mis-behaved like that. On the otherhand, I can easily see the kids doing that, since things like that are just what kids do.
I think it’s awful that Angie and Brad are getting criticized for it, though. As Sherry said, they weren’t even there!
Oh, and I also find it fishy that there was only one nanny. Angie herself has said that they have more than one nanny, and even if they DID have just one nanny, I highly doubt she’d take the older kids into the hall and leave the twins unattended!
If the Kids make noise, they are normal. If they are not running around and make noise then they is something wrong here. It is up to the adults in this case the nanny to take a firm hand, if the nanny does not how to take control, the kids will outsmart them if they are intelligent. Kids are Kids, that’s why they make have fun, make noise and run around especially if they are a 7 year old to lead them. I think the nanny did not tried hard enough and just let them play.
The guest (s) wishes to remain ‘anonymous”! THAT says it all. Gee, I wonder who the hotel would rather have back—the anonymous whiny complaining people or the Jolie-Pitt’s..? As a fan, I would have LOVED being on the same floor. But, hey, that’s just me
I think it is kind of snootie/stuffy/suspect on the one complaining.
If they wanted to, the Jolie-Pitt’s could rent out an entire floor. Actually, I’m surprised they didn’t. Some “people” just want to “stick it” to them because they are SO famous, SO attractive, SO in love with their kids & each other, Plan B is SO successful and Brad & Angie are having the time of their lives with their six kids and counting.
It is amazing to me that a “lie” can go around the world—while the “truth” stands still.
and a P.S. thanks Sherry for all you do. I don’t know how you do it, but, I am SO gratful to you.
Funny story! I still doubt if it´s true. And so what if it is. This just shows that they´re normal children. Thye love to disobey their nanny and do things that any other child would do. Although their parents would have been there they sure would have ran around the corridors. Children of their age love to explore and have adventures. so don´t blame the nanny. Or Brad and Angie! They all are doing a great job. Angie and Brad are great parents and sure have put some limits to their children. Pretty soon all six will be running around when the twins learn to walk. God bless the JPs!
so their making an issue again with the JP kids..
i don’t know if i will believe this..
well, just like everyone, i have two sides on this..
first, their KIDS. kids love to run and play all day! they have that kind of energy that seems to never run down. and we have a two year old at our house and her pediatrician said that her age is the age of playing and being wild. kids from two above tends to play, run, jump, scream, get things all over then throw it away, go somewhere where you can’t find them or anything they want to do. it’s not like they wanted to cause trouble, it’s just that they have too much energy and they have to release it all. they don’t know that what their doing is ok for others or not, it’s because that’s the way they express things out. that’s the way they reach out to others, tell them that their here and wanted a little bit of attention. you don’t have to say “NO!” to a kid, because the tendency is they would be curious and things will get out of your hands.
the nanny should talk to them, i guess this is my second side of the story. the nanny didn’t do her job very well. she should talk to the kids, tell them in a nice and simple way that they would understand or let them inside were they could play w/o disturbing other people. we all know the right to privacy so maybe the other guest wanted to rest since it’s already late. but just like our kid here, she is still awake eventhough it’s 11pm already.
i don’t blame brad or angie. they don’t deserve to be blamed after all. i think what they need to do is to talk to the nanny and tell her what she needs to do in case the kids would do that again.
1. Having children you can’t support is negligent. Having children you know you can’t support is child abuse.
2. “Collecting” children is as pathological as collecting cats or dogs. It is indicative of pathology. If B and A can afford to provide a lifestyle that allows all of their children to have interaction, education, love, attention and the material things they need to not only survivie but strive, then that’s fine. This woman can’t.
3. If you can’t control your children at an upscale hotel to the extent that they bother other paying guests, you’ve got a problem. I don’t care who you are. See #2.
I hope this situation in London is an rare breakdown. I totally disagree with you that say “Oh kids will be kids.” I like A and B and don’t want to see them turn into the sort of celebrities that think that rules are different for them. My kids wouldn’t be allowed to run wild. What I have always liked is that Brad and Angelina says they want their kids to grow up normal and make gifts and … This incident is the sort of behavior that contradicts that.
I don’t believe that this story is true! One wld. think that you wldn’t wait an hour to complain after all that noise! They wld have said something to the management after 10 minutes! I’m sure the kids know better than to run up and down the hallway and what with all the adults there?! They wld know that they wldn’t allow that in that highbrow hotel. The story is all made up!
This is sounds like one person with an axe to grind…If this story is true, one might have heard them getting off the elevator or walking the hallway to get to one’s suite, did these guest stay in the hallway? lets be for real, these hotel suites are huge, and to some degree sound proof, right? So why would one be anywhere near the door or hallway for an hour, as this seem like the only way you would have been able to hear the kids in the hallway. I say good for the nanny, let them run and play, they are kids regardless of whose kids they are. For those who think they should have been in bed, the time zone could have been a factor, traveling could have been a factor as to why these kids were up.
Heh, Keats, thanks, but I’m not back. I just had to weigh in on the kids. And this will be my last comment on them, I’ll exercise some self-discipline.
Let’s keep some perspective. In California, even criminals get 3 strikes before they’re thrown in the prisons permanently without hope of parole. This is ONE incident, REFUTED by the hotel. EVEN IF it had happened, it’s one incident. If the JP kids established a pattern and record of destructiveness, then I’d be concerned.
Every report I’ve read in the media of the kids have described them as polite and well-behaved. This is the first report – a false report – which paints the JP kids as hooligans. So I know who and what I’m going to believe.
I was raised in the Philippines for the first 8 years of my life and I went to Catholic school for 12 years. When we came to the U.S. in 1964, I was amazed at how impolite and unruly American kids were. Granted, Filipino parents erred on the side of being unnecesarily strict. But when Filipino teachers, such as my cousins, are recruited to work in the U.S., they suffer a huge culture shock. In the Philippines, students still rise at attention when the teacher walks into the classroom and s/he is addressed as Mr./Mrs. so-and-so. Two of my brothers and my 2 sister-in-laws are teachers. Honestly, I don’t know how anyone can learn in today’s school environment – it’s a lot different from when I attended junior and senior high schools in 1964-1970.
Some people just don’t like or “get” children. This was the most ridiculous gripe.
I felt the same when I read about the press calling Suri Cruise a brat because she didn’t want a bodyguard to touch her doll stroller. This gist was that she had a great vocabulary and shouldn’t behave that way..seeing how she is 3 and all! Many extremely verbal 3 year olds are still 3 years old.
Linda, you work at the hotel where the kids were supposedly being unruly??? Cool, and I’m glad your hotel has refuted the story.
I’m just passing through, I come here once and a while and find its the only place you can post and not be attacked regardless of whether or not you’re a fan of A&B… I’m not a fan but think they are great actors.
Lets be real, 4 kids “terrorized” a hotel???? I think this is if nothing else over the top. And while I don’t agree with the statement “oh well kids will be kids” I do acknowledge that no matter how much you teach respect and dole out punishment kids will act out. If and its a big if, this happened by all means the kids should be “punished” by their mom and dad WHO WEREN’T there and the person in charge should be reprimanded. But given everything going on in the world, global financial crisis, deadly fires in Oz, this is NOT newsworthy and is in all likelihood an attack on the parenting skills of AJ & BP.
RE; the mom of octopulets. I find this disgraceful, and whomever, meaning the medical professionals, assisted her should face disciplinary hearings. I feel for these 8 kids and the 6 she already has, they do not deserve this. But this woman is not right, she CANNOT support them and has set up a website to collect money. FOR SHAME. Also, any comparisons to AJ are a stretch and frankly insulting to AJ.
Right on, Soozie!!!
Phobe you are not INSANE!LOL!!! I was just so frustatred about the how this women was able to have all these babies and no one stopped it! and her unbelivable look to Angelina after she had some work done! but hopefully she will get the help she needs and those babies will strive!
thanks Rosie:)
i am from Germany and all i heard about that woman was firstly tabloid stuff and that she was compared to Angie. i have informed myself know i and totally totally understand why many people are so angry!!!!
Neela:
sorry i ´didin´t know much about Nadya…know after i know i can truly understand why so many people have a problem with her. i think its total nonsense by the media to compare her to Angie!
Phoebe, no worries. No need to apologize, really.
I tried not to pay attention to Nadya, but I am disturbed by her, and I’m bothered by the comparison to Angie as well. I don’t know why for the love of a higher being why my mother chose to subscribe to US Weekly, and because of my annoying curiosity, I started reading the article on Nadya Suleman, and of course, there was the comparison to Angie. And before I could get past the first page, I threw away the magazine because the article said something about Angie having a “yen for collecting children.” Such an insult. Because really, Angie likes to gather them and hang them on a wall or display them on a shelf!
Regarding Nadya Suleman….I agree with whomever it was that basically said we’re being a bunch of hypocrites. We hate it that Angie is constantly criticized for having a large family and expanding that family so quickly. We also hate the false things she’s accused of, such as having plastic surgery and basically controlling Brad as if he were a puppet.
Yet some of us are now doing the exact same thing to Nadya! I mean, talk about not practicing what you preach! I also don’t think it’s right to accuse ANYONE of things you don’t know are true.
For example, none of us, I repeat, NONE of us, know whether or not Nadya has had any sort of work done. We know Angie’s lips are natural (all you have to do is look at Shiloh, the twins, pictures of Angie when she was a kid, and pictures of her mother), so who’s to say that Nadya’s aren’t natural as well (granted, I’ve never seen old pictures of her, so I have no idea if her lips have always looked like Angie’s)?
Speaking of which…While I DO certainly see a resemblance between Nadya and Angie, I don’t think they look THAT much alike. In fact, I think Megan Fox looks a lot more like Angie than Nadya does (not that there’s anything wrong with that!).
I think that, with Nadya and Angie, it’s just one of those cases of two unrelated people who happen to look similar (in fact, in their 2008 year-end issue, PEOPLE magazine ran a feature of side-by-side photos of celebs and people who resemble them. I’m not kidding, some of those people could very easily be mistaken for the real celeb!).
Anyway, while I understand Nadya’s mother’s frustration, I do hope that she doesn’t cut her daughter and grandchildren out of her life completely. Grandmothers are a blessing, and I’d hate to see those children (especially the octuplets, who haven’t even really gotten a chance to know her yet) be deprived of a relationship with their grandmother.
One of my grandmothers died when I was only six years old, and to this day I regret that I didn’t have more time with her. It also saddens me that I now have only faint memories of her.
Therefore, I know how important it is for children to know and have a relationship with their grandparents!
All of that said, I wonder how Angie would respond if someone asked her about Nadya and her situation?
UNDER MOD- My thoughts about Nayda, and how I think some of us are being hyopcritical by criticizing her.
joliepittfanatic, this time, i have to disagree with you.
the reasons for criticism of Nadya is valid. many have explained it well. if Nadya and her family have the financial means to support 14 children over night, then, she wouldn’t receive criticism. in fact, when it first broke news that Nadya gave birth to 8 kids, the majority were ecstatic about it. but after learning of her circumstances—being unemployed, living with her parents in a small house, having 6 older kids, etc.—it’s hard not to be critical. her very own mother has been vocal of how much she disapproves of the situation. from 6 kids to 14 is a major jump. her own mother has been critical of nadya’s situation, and understandably so.
i don’t think we are being hypocritical because Angie has the financial means to support her big brood and still run a school for girls in Africa and help out orphanages. that’s a mighty difference between Angie and Nadya, so, i don’t think hypocrisy really comes into play. she also has a partner and extended family members who can help out. she has resources, whereas Nadya does not.
and i can understand your point about the plastic surgery issue, but to be honest, and this is just my opinion, i truly believe she has had them. seeing her before pictures on RADAR does convince me. if she had surgery, and i believe she did, to look like Angie, then, she wouldn’t be the first to do so, but i find such things creepy, no matter who does it just to try to look like a certain celebrity.
while i have nothing against megan, i really do not see the resemblance between her and angie. although megan fox looks like sasha grey … hehe. don’t ask me how i know about sasha … when one has guy friends, well, there are things you learn from guys being guys.
nevertheless, we all have different perceptions. so, we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
under mod: joliepittfanatic, this is the first time i’ll have to disagree with you
just want to add that i think many are just concerned for the survival of all 14 children, that’s why criticism has been loud.
I have to agree with Neela. I don’t think I’m being hypocritical because I think their situations are totally different. I’m not questioning her love for her kids, I’m sure she loves them all very much.
But she is not in a situation to afford to care for 14 children. Brad and Angelina have six kids, large by today’s standards, but they can more than afford to care for them properly.
Also, like I’ve already mentioned, I’m very angry with the doctor who never should have implanted so many embryos at once. It’s very high risk and to deliver eight babies all in one shot is dangerous to both Nadya and all of her babies. They’re lucky they didn’t lose anyone. It’s medically irresponsible in my opinion. Most in vitro attempts involve two or three embryos at the most, in the hopes that at least one will work out. More than that is endangering everyone.
Karen, I completely agree with you! I hadn’t heard the story about Suri Cruise, but it makes me chuckle to think the tabs couldn’t even get her age right. She is actually 2, not 3. She won’t be 3 until April (just as Shi won’t be 3 until May).
i agree with you sherry ,IM NOT ALSO UPET AT THE KIDS ESP. THEY STILL TOO YOUNG AND BESIDES IM NO REALLY BELEIVE IN THIS TABLOID STORY. THEY ONLY CREATED IT OFCOARSE! YOU CAN SEE THEM HOW THEY BEHAVE EVEN THOUGH THE FANS ARE GETING WILD AND CALL THEIR NAMES THE JOLIE PITT KIDS ARE WELL BEHAVED!
Oh, and one thing I forgot to mention about Nadya is that I think saying she’s trying to be like Angie is actually a little odd.
I mean, Nayda’s oldest kid is what: 6 or 7? And her youngest before the Octuplets is, I believe, 2. Therefore, of Nayda’s first six kids, most were born when Angie still had only one child-Maddox. Depending on when the two-year-old’s birthday is, Angie and Brad had either only Maddox and Zahara, or Maddox, Zahara, and Shi when s/he was born.
Even if it was the latter, three kids is still hardly a lot of kids. Therefore, when she had her first six kids, I really don’t see how Nayda could have been trying to be like Angie.
Now, was she trying to be like Angie when she had the Octuplets? Who knows (although, from watching her interview with Ann Curry, I get the impression that she simply wanted a lot of kids. I also get the impression that she never expected to end up with Octuplets, because she thought that the IVF procedure either wouldn’t work at all, or only a few embryos would implant)?
My point is that I don’t think she started out trying to be like Angie. That said, this is the last I’ll say on that topic.
Ok, I agree with you guys about kids being kids and I can see them being rowdy in a sense I mean screaming and laughing the little girls while being chased by their older brothers playing tag…possible…But I also think that one have to factor in that they are in London. Children are very very very well behaved in London in public places. The English, from what I’ve seen are very quiet, serene and poised people. They are proud of that. Si I can see screaming kids can appear very unlruly to them Now I could be wrong, any English or British people to share their two cents?
The hotel debunked this fictional story – why are we talking about it as if it was fact? We’re just perpetuating the rumor. LOL, don’t make me come out of my sabbatical again.
BTW, thanks, Sherry. Got the wonderul organic silk blend knit scarf I won here. So light, warm in cold, rainy, windy weather, and yet cool in hot weather. Amazing. I’m going to order another one since they gave me a 10% off coupon.
Ligaya – I’m so glad that you were finally able to receive it! I hadn’t heard back from my contact so I didn’t know what was going on yet. Yay!
amen Ligaya. hehe … and hey, congratulations for the scarf and also Sugar. I like the trailer
Ligaya, I am sure I am not alone when I say, we wish you would not take a sabbatical. You add spice and fire to Pittwatch.
I think this says it all about Nadya/Angelina. What I don’t understand is IVF and plastic surgery are supposed to be very expensive – how was Nadya able to get both procedures – or 3, since both pregnancies were IVF – since she didn’t have money? The medical providers made highly questionable decisions. IMO, they should be held accountable.
http://www.theimproper.com/Template_Article.aspx?IssueId=11&ArticleId=3167
So for all the parents of little girls who are afraid their impressionable daughters might say, “It’s okay for me to have lots of kids out of wedlock since Angelina Jolie does, right?” You can reply, “Absolutely, right after you’ve earned and donated millions of dollars, won an Academy Award and become a U.N. Ambassador before the age of 30.”
Don’t Blame Angelina for Nadya Suleman Fiasco
By Samantha Chang
Nadya Suleman, the California woman who gave birth to octuplets Jan. 26, bears an uncanny resemblance to actress Angelina Jolie, thanks to all the plastic surgery she reportedly underwent (see a before-and-after photo below).
Like Jolie, Suleman, 33, has the same tapered button nose, pouty lips and a truckload of young children under the age of 8. But that’s really where the similarities end.
Not surprisingly, Nadya is said to be obsessed with Angelina and has repeatedly tried to contact the actress. For her part, Jolie is “totally creeped out” by Suleman, a source close to the actress told the Chicago Sun Times. “It is clear this woman needs psychological help,” says the insider. “It’s one thing to clip out a celebrity’s photo from a magazine and ask your stylist to copy that cut. But to have a nose job and collagen injections in your lips—that’s over the top.”
Since Suleman has obviously fashioned herself to resemble Jolie, some may wonder if celebs like Angelina—who make motherhood look glamorous—might be influencing impressionable women seeking attention and a sense of purpose in life to have kids—and lots of them. But is Angelina really to blame for the sorry state of Nadya’s life? Gimme a break!
Jolie, who has been a working actress since her teens, has made—and donated—millions of dollars over the years to charitable causes. Indeed, it is widely known that Angie, 33, donates one-third of her income to charity every year.
In addition, Jolie is a respected actress who was established in her career and won numerous awards before she first became a mom in 2002 (when she adopted son Maddox from a Cambodian orphanage).
In stark contrast, Nadya ignited a media firestorm for having having 14 children out of wedlock while unemployed and on food stamps. She made international headlines when it was revealed that she was already the mother of six young children when she was implanted with six embryos through in-vitro fertilization. Two of the embryos split, which resulted in 8 babies.
Until recently, Nadya lived with her 69-year-old mom Angela Suleman, who was the primary caregiver for all six of her grandchildren. Nadya’s mom has said she has been financially supporting Nadya and all the kids without any help from her self-absorbed, irresponsible daughter.
“I’m really tired of taking care of the six children and need her to think about how she’ll provide for all these children,” Angela said recently. “Nadya promised to help me with the bills, but she never has. I lost a house because of it, and now I’m struggling to look after her six.”
While Angelina can support her own children, doesn’t burden her family and even contributes to others in need, Nadya is a financial and emotional drain on her senior-citizen mom and really, to her community at large.
It takes more than a nose job and lip injections for someone like Suleman to be like Angelina. She’d first have to have a career, earn her own money and have her own identity before birthing a litter of innocent kids, who unfortunately, will suffer for having a psychotic mom.
So for all the parents of little girls who are afraid their impressionable daughters might say, “It’s okay for me to have lots of kids out of wedlock since Angelina Jolie does, right?” You can reply, “Absolutely, right after you’ve earned and donated millions of dollars, won an Academy Award and become a U.N. Ambassador before the age of 30.”
Samantha Chang is the executive editor of TheImproper.com.
(While I don’t think Nadya is necessarily psychotic in the clinical sense, IMO, she definitely has mental health issues and – based on her statements – has a weak grasp of reality.)
UNDER MOD:
I think this says it all about Nadya/Angelina. What I don’t understand is IVF and plastic surgery are supposed to be very expensive – how was Nadya able to get both procedures – or 3, since both pregnancies were IVF – since she didn’t have money? The medical providers made highly questionable decisions. IMO, they should be held accountable.
http://www.theimproper.com/Template_Article.aspx?IssueId=11&ArticleId=3167
So for all the parents of little girls who are afraid their impressionable daughters might say, “It’s okay for me to have lots of kids out of wedlock since Angelina Jolie does, right?” You can reply, “Absolutely, right after you’ve earned and donated millions of dollars, won an Academy Award and become a U.N. Ambassador before the age of 30.”
Don’t Blame Angelina for Nadya Suleman Fiasco
In response to Brangelina forever. My hubby is british and I lived in London for 4 years…. the whole british people are reserved/stiff upper lip/children minding their manners is a MYTH. Like everywhere you have the good, the bad and the ugly. I certainly don’t think kids misbehaving is anything new and is something for their parents, or whomever was in charge to deal with. I totally doubt this story.
Ligaya- Actually ALL of Nayda’s children were concieved via IVF. She has 14 all together, including the octuplets and a set of twins. Therefore, that means that she’s had IVF at least 6 times (I say at least because, for all we know, some of the first attempts weren’t succesful). I don’t know what you meant by “both pregnancies”.
Oh, and thanks for posting the entire article. After reading it, I’ve changed my stance on being mad at the author for taking some jabs at Angie (Ligaya, if you’re confused, read my post over on the “Brad Cruises LA on his Motorcyle, thread).
I now believe that the author the author was actually trying to be very supportive of Angie, and I don’t think she made any intentional jabs at her.
Oh, and Brangelina4Ever, very good point about the British being more quiet and proper than us Americans are. I also agree that, if the story HAD been true, I could definently see the kids doing that. I mean, maybe Maddox and Pax are probably old enough to know they shouldn’t be doing that, but Zee Zee is only four and Shi isn’t even three yet. At those ages, kids tend to act out a lot.
JoliePittFanatic, by both pregnancies I meant – if I understand the reports right – the first with sextuplets and the second with octuplets, both achieved by IVF.
UNDER MOD:
JoliePittFanatic, by both pregnancies I meant -
Thanks, Mary Ann. I really appreciate that. I’m really lousy at multi-tasking and it’s more than enough doing what I can to help publicize and promote Sugar among our extensive network of family, friends, etc. with newsletters, organizing the opening night after-party, keeping on top of the Ryan Fleck archives, etc.
Maybe by Ryan’s 4th movie, he’ll be well-known enough that he won’t need homegrown promotion.
I like that “fire and spice.”
Sabatical? What is going on….how long? I think I’m starting to have <>
I like that “fire and spice” too, Marry Ann. Sometimes you can say a lot in with two little words….
Ligaya- Huh? Nayda does NOT have sextuplets! She has the Octuplets, four singletons, and a set of twins.
UNDER MOD- Ligaya, Nadya doesn’t have sextuplets…
UNDER MOD- My “under mod” post!
I say let kids be kids, Brad and Angelina who cares what people say about your kids. If kids are not making messes, then they are not healthy.
daisy
About the kids having been up too late and should be in bed: I’m guessing they weren’t actually adjusted to that time zone physically yet and it was probably a logical time for them to be up- and since they were all leaving that night- why try to adjust, as they were probably going back to whatever time zone they were acclimated to. ?? Perhaps?