Wow, US just got on Angie’s bad side…
So what do you do when you’re US magazine and People once again trumps you for pictures of Angelina Jolie and her kids? You get snarky, I guess.
The newest issue of US has Angie on the cover with a blazing headline of “Her Twisted Double Life”, followed by bullets stating:
Ouch. Bitter much?
First the raked her over the coals for her announcement that she would be a stay at home mother to help Pax adjust to her new life, only to sign on to film “Wanted” which starts shooting in Prague in April.
I admit that I’m confused over that one. I don’t know why she would have announced to have chosen to stay home for awhile only to change her mind, but I can’t help but wonder if - as often happens - maybe her words were twisted. I wonder if she meant she would only work if she could bring her kids with her or if she meant either she or Brad would stay home with the kids while the other worked whenever possible. Who knows?
On the other hand, it kind of smacks of the double standard where she’s damned if she gives it all up to be at home and damned if she works. Typical “mom must be perfect” fare, just on a celebrity level.
What truly irks me is this part of the article:
The day Jolie picked up Pax at the orphanage, where paparazzi swarmed, she said, “Photographs make him upset.I’m sorry for bringing this into his life.”
And yet, just days after picking up Pax, Jolie staged photos of herself, Zahara, Maddox and Pax and sold them to the U.K.’s Hello! magazine and People magazine.
Why the change of heart on the photography issue? Why can’t Angelina settle down? Is she confusing Pax?
Are they completely stupid? She’s sorry that photographers strong armed their way into her son’s face as he was being taken to a new life. Who wouldn’t be?
But are they really so moronic that they can’t figure out why she staged a photo shoot which she sold to People? I’ll give you three good reasons why:
1. When I was reading Down Came the Rain by Brooke Shields about her post partum depression, she shielded her daughter Rowan from cameras for the first few days or weeks. BUT, being a celebrity she knew that rabid photographers would never leave them alone until they got the pictures of her baby so she quickly chose which magazine she wanted to work with exclusively and then she did a proper photo shoot in order to give the public photos they wanted but in a manner where SHE was in control. If you ask me, that’s probably the primary reason Angie staged a photo shoot in a quiet, controlled environment; there’s a big difference between set up photos in a hotel room and and chaotic shutter clicking as people chase you to your car.
2. She knew that everyone was willing to shell out good money for the exclusive official photos and she knew she could turn around that and donate it to help more people - just like she did when Shiloh was born.
3. She chose to do it with People/Hello because they’ve been good to her and they aren’t big freakin’ smear campaign fans like US.
Whew. I think I may have gotten worked up. I’ll have to see if I can grab the issue to get the full article. Apparently US also labels her with an addictive personality because she had a decent amount of sex (gasp) in her life, and had some drug experimentation when she was younger and so clearly the fact that she likes to adopt means she is addicted to adoption. Unnamed sources claim she had a big argument with Brad over whether she should adopt Pax or slow down, but as usual with shady reporting, the source is completely unknown.
And again, they have a relationship “expert” saying:
“Angelina’s behavior may cause problems because it’s hypocritical. Either you want to build a stable family or you want to be a woman with the career who’s flying off here, flying there, doing this film, doing that film. But you can’t have it both ways.”
Right, because mothers can’t do anything but take care of their children. Hello, and thank you for setting the feminist movement back 50 or 60 years!
I’m disappointed, truly. I have been a fan of US in the past but this snarky article just screams of self-pity that they didn’t win the photo shoot bid themselves. Well, WAH.
Thoughts? Let’s discuss, but please remember to be respectful.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Gossip, Jolie-Pitt babies, Musings
81 opinions for Wow, US just got on Angie’s bad side…
dark faith
Mar 28, 2007 at 7:53 pm
wow i gess US tabloyed wants to win the award for best work of fiction by writting this.
jelligirl
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:17 pm
i can see why celebrities hate the rags that publish stories that aren’t true…as much as i don’t like britney spears, she never gives an interview to us magazine, opting for people instead…angie has a great relationship with people magazine, why shouldn’t she give them the interview and the pics? its way better than some photographer diving down at them from some tree…she gets enough of that as it is…as far as her career goes…i WISH i had a life like that…i would take ALL of my kiddies and do what is best for me and my family regardless of what anyone has to say…there a lot of snarky people out there who are just jealous of what she is doing and will say anything to make a buck…how sad…i don’t purchase any magazines if they are nasty towards my favourite couple…
luv=bradangshimadzpax
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:25 pm
Luv what u typed.You go!We the true admirers of this family know that the SunGod(Brad) loves his SunGoddess(Angelina),(and vice versa).Brad and Angelina luv their children,the family unit is intact and all is well.Jealousy,greed,and spite I would venture to type is what this garbage rag story is about.Makes me disgusted that rag mags would go this far,but unless Angelina or Brad speak out theirselves directly about ‘problem issues’,I choose to think their living a normal happy family life.(as normal as they can have with idiots like rag mags and razzies around).Thats my take on it.I dont contribute to Us(a–h -.les) anyway.But I luv your vent,u can strike harder Idon’t mind.Luv this family and what their doing.God bless all. Ang.,praying 4 you its only been 2 months and a day since your mom died.
cynthia
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:50 pm
I am 100% with you, Sherry. The tabloids twisted the facts to get attention, all for money. They do it to other celebrities as well. It breaks my heart to know about these articles, although I must admit I don’t usually read them. They’re trash. Angie is really one of the most misunderdstood person. Whatever she does with all the goodness of her heart, they will still write negative things about her. She is just but human and she is not perfect but I believe in her and love this wonderful family. I do wish that these malicious accusations would go away. They are hurtful.
Jolie-Pitt 4Ever
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Here’s a new scenerio….maybe, just maybe Angie is using this time to bond with Pax while Brad is finishing off his scenes for the CCoBB. Brad too is bonding but not as much as Angie since she’s home all day, thus being the primary caregiver. When the roles reverse next month, Angie will be working and Brad will have more time to bond with Pax while he’s home throughout the day. It’s nice to be able to split the roles up between the two. If only we all had the opportunity, I think we would do the same. Doesn’t Angie donate a percentage of her salary to charity and worthwhile causes? Wouldn’t she need to maintain some employment in order to do this? I’m not a reader of US magazine, so I doubt I’ll read this article unless - I come across it at my doctors office.
shane
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:56 pm
US is really pissed, to go that length for a news which is over a week old shows how bitter they are and pissed that they can’t get any closer to have an exclusive with the Jolie-Pitts. With regards to her working, it wasn’t like she was just offered the role lately and took it, the role has been hers probably for quite a while and was just reported recently. The stay-at-home-mom thing must have been taken out of context for what AJ really want to mean. The shoot can mean anything, I mean it will probably starts on April but doesn’t necessarily mean she has to be there. The bottom line is people are so predictable they are so gullible they quickly jump on every news and make judgements and opinions on things which are so vague. The Joli-Pitts have shown in the past how smart they are in handling the media situation, more kudos to AJ for doing so even without a publicist.
The article went so far as to criticise working moms, you’re right Sherie that one home it, now relegating woman to domesticity. it’s actually hilarious that these comments came from experts.
No one knows what the Jolie-Pitt family really is but judging from the way their kids look when taken random pics (hey that’s how far i can go) they seems to be happy kids and with distinct personalities to boot.
i admire Angelina for her tireless activism for the refugees and children. So does Brad’s own activism to bring effort in rebuilding NOLA. That’s all that counts. Tabloids can be entertaining but that’s how far they will go for me pure entertainment but not a source of facts because they themselves are the pioneers of hypocrisy and manipulation.
Jess
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:57 pm
Lies Lies lies! They just want to sell their mag and know a photo on the front of Ange will do that for them. Truth is they don’t have anything to write about. I would like to see how the family are getting on but am also glad they managed to get some family time away from the paparazzi. Selling the photos gives them the control. Not many other celebrities give the profits to charity. The Jolie-Pitts couldn’t do wrong in my book.
checkers
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Geez!! papparazzi can’t get photos, this family chooses who they want to release photos of their private life… this is all publicity stunt. you’re right Sherry, there are only a few magazine that they consider worth something (elle,vogue,hello and people)divulging info to..
this twisted double life is a bunch of crap!!! for all we know, I’m sure this was not done deliberate, I’m sure she has signed up to do this film way before she knew that Pax was readily available to join their family… Ange is being smart in anything that she does and so is Brad, they both think things thru for the betterment of their family… I’m sure she will be a stay home mom, but she even admit that raising children need alot of money. this article for sure has been twisted… like I said before, they are very selective and take things out of context… if it is from any other source aside from what I have mentioned then I wouldn’t buy it! why waste time and have anxiety over it!
Gena
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:10 pm
As a result of the article in”US”,I will no longer look at their mag. At one time I started to subscribe until I noticed how negative their to A.J. and Brad. Plus their information is full of lies. Tonight one of the churches in my community hosted a “African Children”s choir from Uganda, ages 7-11. Those kids have seen death and hunger. Hell, I wanted to adopt one or two myself but they made the announcement that they were not up for adoption but we could take them home with us by purchasing one of their cds.
I don’t understand why there is a need by the media to trash Brad and Angie. People and HELLO are the only positive magazines.
checkers
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:13 pm
btw, I just finishe reading People magazine even the article they have published is nowhere near what has been said out there by other magazine, well we all know the answer to this, because Angelina did not speak to any other tabloid magazine (aside from whom they trust) who wants to make a quick bucks.. so please don’t patronize any of unworthy magazine!!
checkers
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:17 pm
Hasn’t anyone notice that neither Brad nor Angeline ever has to clear up anything that is written up about their lovely family or about them? it is because they know their truth and obviously they are not affected. They live their lives day to day like normal people, the only difference is that they make things happen and they have brought attention and are doing something about the crisis around the world…
checkers
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:21 pm
I like your comment Gena, People and Hello don’t have to harass them for an interview and or photos, Jolie-Pitt go to them, they have gained their trust, and not just BAMPZS they don’t fabricate stories to make money, that’s why they are reputable!!
checkers
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:25 pm
btw, thanks Sherry for this article, it’s much appreciated, but this one, got my blood boiling! lol!
15for2
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:32 pm
Who wasn’t a little wild and crazy when they were younger? Some people show it by having lots of sex, others by playing lots of chess, or loud music, or reading every book in the library. So Ange grows up nice, wants to help the world and is in an excellent position to do so. Brad says, wow, that’s what the world is really about, not just my hair and career and a match made in heaven is formed.
So what does the press do? Anything they can to sell a few mags. Shock, horror, awe. The positive so very rarely sells.
And do folks really believe it, when they see it sitting on the rack at the register? Nah. Probably not. But it’s sensationalism and it is sensational to read about it.
Great website, whoever you are :-)
viva brangelina
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:41 pm
Janice Min was pissed becuz the jolie pitts didnot sell the pictures for UsMag.
i think UsMag is an opprtunist. they wrote something bad about jen too. they’ll do anything to increase the selling.
everything angelina does always been given a bad credit. we cannot stop those hate.
i wish God give angie and brad the strength to face the world and keep doing their good work.
dark faith
Mar 28, 2007 at 10:41 pm
hey go to the TOMKAT CRAZY site so you can vote for shiloh as cutest celebrity baby.
cristine
Mar 28, 2007 at 11:30 pm
sherry thanks for the article although i’m not surprise. ken baker from us mag hates angelina. he along w/ ryan seacrest trashed angie at ryan’s radio station here in los angeles[kiss fm 102.7] the day after golden globe. i e-mailed them both and call on them for their cruelty on angie.i campaigned against them to all my friends and family so as not to support us mag and ryan’s radio station.and now i will continue to do so! they cannot accept the fact that angie didnt trust them! why would she? these 2 idi**s never say anything good abt.angie since she hooked up w/ brad! they are both on the other teams side w/c they always praise. maybe they’re on her paycheck! tonite i planned on flooding us mag in defense of angie! DAMNED! i’m boiling mad right now! okey what i know abt.angie’s movies from 2 of brad’s site and another 1 of angie’s.it say’s angie signed up for challenging and wanted since last year. she will start to shoot late may by that time brad wrapped up his tccobb and will not take any work ’til next year. they both agreed that they will not get jobs together. one has to care for the kids. abt.pax’s adoption angie wanted it asap so she can bond w/ him for few months before she starts to shoot. and she will be busy ’til end of the year! she had mentioned before that she needs to work so she will be able to support the charity that she chosed.SO WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THAT? the things that angie has done to humanity nothing can compare!she is risking her life to reach to the needy.she has the biggest heart! Again guys,STOP BUYING US MAG and only believe and support people magazine!
our BAMPZS family is ROCK SOLID! lets continue to pray for their health and safety!
Lyonel
Mar 29, 2007 at 12:38 am
I’ve been the one passively reading about Angie, Brad and the kids. (BTW, LOVE your site) Usmag is just a parasite scum mag. What concerns me is that Angie just lost her mom, dealing with a new son, trying so hard to raise her children right — why can’t they just leave them be. Why? Well, because they are low life parasite scums, that’s why! They weren’t out for publicity when they went to see Pax the first time in the orphanage. I mean the people there didn’t even know they were celebrities! It just goes to show you how low people will go for the mulah!
die_hard
Mar 29, 2007 at 12:59 am
US is one heck of a HATER mag….*roll eyes*
and the best thing to do about them: IGNORE!!!!
BAMPZS may not be a perfect family because i think there’s no such thing as “perfect family”?! the important thing is they are working it out & they are working really hard to keep their family going steady & strong.
what makes life really hard on BAMPZS are articles & tabloids like this one. but i am praying for the family & so does many other people.
i guess they just can’t get enough of Brad & Angie getting so well with their kids that they always try to break the family apart.
WE’LL JUST IGNORE ALL HATERS!!!!
Dukka
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:13 am
Check out this story about Angelina and Brad and threats of Pax kidnapping. It’s long and full of information that may or may not be true from a story in Life and Style. Explains why Angie can’t eat. Terrified about her kids being kidnapped for ransom. Beefed up security around house and family. Sounds horrifying. Hope it’s all false rumor.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/03/28/magazine-angelina-target_n_44427.html
abelard
Mar 29, 2007 at 3:50 am
Great comments, and I agree. I hope and pray that BP and AJ and their kids can ignore all of these negative lies published about them, and just continue on with their wonderful work and their normal family life.
As a consumer, I no longer purchase any mags or watch shows that are negative about BP or AJ. That includes everything related to Oprah (I used to be a big fan, but not anymore) and E! and mags like US Weekly. I do, however, like People magazine a lot more now!
captd
Mar 29, 2007 at 4:40 am
Well Us seems to want to use Angie to sell their mag by putting her on the cover. They don’t care about truth just sales. No wonder celebs stay away from them. Brad and Angie hopefully live above the fray of false stories and lies. I think sometime these mags think if they print these lies it will somehow affect the way Brad and Angie live their lives. WRONG!!! Brad and Angie are loving parents and until the haters have to pay their bills and fed their family and provide for their lifestyle they need to back off. Excuse me but they are a two parent household. How many working two parent households are there in the world. At least they try to make sure one is home when the other is working, but htey are both still young and deserve to enjoy their careers and their family. Millions do it every day. Go Bamz & P Love this family.
Andrea
Mar 29, 2007 at 6:08 am
I agree with you 100% Sherry, you know it. :) As to the stay-at-home comment, all she said was she was going to stay home and help Pax adjust to his new life. That’s hardly an announcement of her staying home for the next 18 years. She probably meant she was going to stay on this continent. :)
Christina
Mar 29, 2007 at 6:33 am
WOW! I agree.. Their statements have no credibility. Everything they said is false and from their own selfish opinion (because they are pissed). I urge everyone to NOT buy this tabloid (except Sherry, so she can give us the scoop) .. You guys nailed it all so I will leave it like that…. Much love to the Jolie-Pitt family
Tulip
Mar 29, 2007 at 9:30 am
You only write the comments that are positive and agree with you. I wrote a comment yesterday which you did not post. I said she has issues and time will tell us all. I feel sorry for Shiloh. That little girl WILL NOT get the same kind of love from your mother. Thank God for her daddy and grandparents. See if you write this!
carm
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:10 am
Us is just try to compet with people mag. That is all!
Sherry
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:26 am
Tulip - actually I don’t mind comments that disagree, but they need to be respectful. I choose to remove comments that are purposely inflammatory because I don’t want flame wars here. Please do feel free to speak your mind but I found the other two comments were just rude for the sake of getting people angry.
If you feel sorry for Shiloh, that’s your right. However Angelina never said that she doesn’t love Shiloh, she said she doesn’t feel the same compassion for her because she has never had to be hungry, alone, lose her parents, give up hope, and see tragedies around her like her siblings did. There is a huge difference between loving your kids and feeling compassion for them due to their circumstances. However, people who dislike Angie will always find something negative.
Tulip
Mar 29, 2007 at 11:48 am
Sherry,
Just because I disagree about thinkin Angie is just the greatest, does not mean I dislike her. I don’t know her at all to dislike her. She is too wrapped up in this adoption and from her saying she does not have compassion for Shiloh WILL spill out in the way she treats her. It is so obvious. In her mind, Shiloh is not as special and just ordinary because she just came about. As I said, we will wait and see. Time will Tell.
checkers
Mar 29, 2007 at 11:56 am
we love you Sherry!
nowordneeded
Mar 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm
Isn’t US a chief Jennifer Aniston supporter? It seems everytime I see this ragmag in the stands at Walmart or at the grocery store, they’ve always got something positive to say about Jennifer but nothing kind at all about Angie or Brad. They are always having articles where Angie is supposedly anxious because Brad’s on the phone with Jennifer, or that Jennifer has told people she plans on getting Brad back. In any case, US is KNOWN to be bitchy about Angie and her truer motives. It’s digusting really. Why can’t they just leave this beautiful family alone?
Seems it’s a smear campaign for the sole purpose of sending the wrong message about Angie and Brad, yet elevate Jennifer to the position of Goddess or something.
Selah
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:29 pm
As a mother of natural and adopted children, I relate to Angelina and Brad very much. Perhaps that is why I’ve gotten to be such a fan. I resent Tulip saying AJ doesn’t have compassion for Shiloh and that Shiloh is not as special as her other children. It does not make AJ a bad or neglecful mother to care a little more for those who need you more. Those quotes where probably little blurts from hours of interview. When I adopted my son, we thought that we would not love him as much as our natural children. But we were wrong. There are times we feel more for him because we consider it a privilege that he chose us. Our other children are loved equally, but there is more of a feeling there when you work to bring someone in your home than when it just naturally happens. I doubt Angelina loves Shiloh less. She is just aware that Shiloh was born into privilege, and the others went through more in their lives in the first few months than Shiloh will probably ever will in her lifetime. That doesn’t make Shiloh any less. It just makes her natural.
sophie
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:33 pm
Tulip, you just wrote “I don’t know her at all” with regard to AJ, yet then you make a comment about AJ being “too wraped up in this adoption”. So, which is it, do you know her, or don’t you know her?
either way, a parent may feel more compassion for one child as opposed to the other. One of my kids is strong and resilient, and faces life as it comes to her, with little worry about what people around her think. My other child is the opposite, always worrying about what people will say or think ….and she has such a hard time, no matter what her father and I try to show and tell her. Does that mean I love her more than my other daughter? ABSOLUETLY NOT, but I do have a bit more compassion for her when it comes to this particular issue. I think that’s all AJ was trying to say as well….it’s compassion for a particular issue.
nette washingtonm
Mar 29, 2007 at 2:24 pm
I THINK I WILL NOT BE PURCHASING US MAGAZINE AGAIN. THE STORIES THEY PUBLISH ARE SO NOT TRUE. GET OVER IT US MAGAZINE, YOU WILL NEVER WIN OUT TO PEOPLE AND HELLO MAGAZINE. BRAD AND ANGIE KNOW THAT THEY WILL PRINT THE TRUTH.
Vivi
Mar 29, 2007 at 4:38 pm
Sherry I totally agree with what you said. This magazine disgusts me, they probably didn’t have anything to say about her, so they keep trying to find these “stories”… it’s very easy to twist words.
yaya
Mar 29, 2007 at 7:04 pm
Geez that wuz a long reading and can’t imagine that they would do something like this, I feel BAMPZS
BlessBrangelina
Mar 29, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Sherry regarding the staying home quote, all the mags and news sources except the AP took her words out of context.
The AP translated the interview she did for the Ho Chin City Law Paper. She said the following as well, which puts it into better context. Since she is NOT filming right now!
**”I’m not making any movies right now,”** Jolie said in the interview. “I will stay at home to help Pax adjust to his new life…”etc.
People mag were the first I think, to edit the quote to just the part US is now throwing back at her with glee!
The fact is she is not making movies right now or then; and by the time she will be her son would have started the settling process. But will have his father and siblings at home to help him whilst Mum works. IF in fact she is attached to Wanted. We know Atlas is in development. And gossips told us about The Changeling also.
I don’t think we have heard anything from Official sources re: Wanted and Changeling yet. Have we?
US weekly is a horrid and untrustworthy mag…but once they put B&A on their cover and it doesn’t matter what they write, people buy. I think we as fans have to start being a little decerning about our reading habits when it comes to these two. Read it in the supermarket but don’t buy. Send them a message that we are on to their hate campaign.
Big babies that they are!!
yaya
Mar 29, 2007 at 7:30 pm
ITA…. Gena
Mandy
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:33 pm
I wrote in a couple of days ago that, the tabloids ran out of stuff to write, and they are DESPERATE! Well, it is so true, now they go every which way to get stories made up.
ShirTuck
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Take the blinders off and you shall see the truth. Her moral compass is dictacted by her selfish needs. And there’s heaps of those!
justpassing
Mar 30, 2007 at 8:08 am
Just wanted to say that I enjoy your website.
shirtuck
Mar 30, 2007 at 6:26 pm
No First Amendment Rights on your website. You simply censor anyone who has a different opinion.
Do you work for George Bush?
Sherry
Mar 30, 2007 at 7:05 pm
Shirtuck - Nope, I don’t work for Bush, I’m Canadian.
I have no problems with differing opinions, but I do expect people to be respectful when they voice them. If you have something intelligent to say, great, but if you’re only here to be rude, then yes I will edit or delete your comments.
A great deal of comments get flagged by Wordpress for moderation, not by me. If I am at my computer I can allow them through quickly but on a day like today where I was out a great deal of the day, I don’t always get to the moderated comments until night time.
If you think Angie is directed by selfish needs you are entitled to think so but someone who spends so much time, energy, money, and love on needy children and refugees doesn’t sound selfish to me.
BlessBrangelina
Mar 30, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Amen, Sherry!
When is this hatred going to end? These are the people that US weekly caters for…*shakes head*
checkers
Mar 30, 2007 at 9:50 pm
lol!! blessbrangelina!!
checkers
Mar 30, 2007 at 9:53 pm
Sherry, thanks, but sweetheart you didn’t have to explain.. we know what this site is all about and needless to say, anyone will agree with me that when people are right out bashing on this site, we can ask you to delete!! right BAMPZS fans?
cristine
Mar 30, 2007 at 10:19 pm
I agree checkers. this site is for the lovers of the BAMPZS family. the haters should stay away to avoid ill feelings towards e/o other. since majority of us here wants the haters to go away we can all agree that sherry delete their comments against our family. they are not wanted here!
ryo_girl
Mar 30, 2007 at 11:37 pm
Us Weekly knows it’s never gonna score anything from the Jolie-Pitts after all its crap, so it’s getting desperate; Angie covers sell, that’s all there is to it.
And regarding her “stay at home” thing…someone pointed out that the interview was translated from English to Vietnamese and then back to English, so I have a feeling a lot of what she said–with Angie, you have to look at EXACT wording–got lost in translation.
HOTTEST COUPLE EVER
Mar 31, 2007 at 1:08 am
Absolutely..checkers and cristine!
crazypinky
Mar 31, 2007 at 7:22 am
i just hate that … am afried it will give jolie a bad feelings ….
i haaaaaaate thaaaaaaaaaat really
i love her 2 death
checkers
Mar 31, 2007 at 7:59 am
see, thanks for agreeing Christine and Hottest couple ever!! we can continue to keep this site harmonious and sometimes haters stumble but they don’t stay.. let’s just not respond to them and continue to ignore, they’ll get the hint!!
BlessBrangelina
Mar 31, 2007 at 1:59 pm
Right checkers!
luv=bradangshimadzpax
Mar 31, 2007 at 9:03 pm
I agree with you guys.Its very frustrating at times when persons(knowingly I think)come to a site where Brad and Angelina are getting luv,respect,just all around good vibes towards them,family and their great works towards others to have someone start either bashing them,or pointing a finger a finger at them about whatever they can find to nitpick about.I say to them it doesnt work.Even your so called best shot(or lamest)isnt going to make a difference.I(we)are 110 percent for this family(if not more).So if your purpose is to be mean and dirty towards them try another site(Us weekly comes to mind).Iadmire this family.Wont change my mind.Brad,Angelina+family always!
checkers
Mar 31, 2007 at 9:20 pm
Right on! blessbrangelina!! and to my fellow BAMPZS fans!! we can probably direct them to other sites that don’t care if they bash on BAMPZS, but if you ask me, these people are also crazy about them since they come to this site!!
checkers
Mar 31, 2007 at 9:58 pm
Clearly, you guys, these haters are not regulars here, they don’t even know that Sherry is not american. Sherry introduced herself the first week of March when she took over this platform and clearly said she was from Canada, lol about working for Bush!!
Jamie
Apr 1, 2007 at 3:39 am
I rarely post any comment on the Us mag, but the manipulative article annoys me so much that I have posted there several comments. One of them which I cite here drives some of those haters mad:
“Vicious people would never see the goodness in Angie. If there is something good, they misrepresent and distort it in such a way that it becomes vicious to fit to their vicious mind.”
I refer this to the tabloids and the “haters” in general.
pat
Apr 1, 2007 at 1:58 pm
I’m not a fan of either one, I just thought I would comment. As a christain, it is applauing that so many people would over look, how these two people got together. And you guys continue to overlook their morals, just because they adopt some kids or give money to charity. A real moral person isn’t seeking fame for their good works, like angie is doing. And she should forgive her father already, it’s been five years already.
yaya
Apr 1, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Why would you come on site that says pittwatch if your a hater? Come now people this is coomon sense if you don’t have anything nice to say, then keep it to your bloody self.
luv=bradangshimadzpax
Apr 1, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Though I dont usually comment to a post such as yours.Ijust thought Id comment.Starting with ‘Ye who is without sin cast the first stone’,(so youre a saint).Continuing with I wasnt there(were you)so I dont really know when,how(except what Ive read or speculated)it happen.And what goes on between Ang and Mr.Voight is their business(I dont know all the ins and outs of the ‘why’ their as you say, she want 4give her dad).But you probably know more than I respectfully, since youve judge their character with your own moral compass.Maybe you know them personally,if so as a christian myself “can you hook me up(humor)and have them call me.Id love to get to know them personally(as you have).But Id probably not come to your conclusion cuz,I alread like em’.You have not the(true)slightest clue why I or others adore them.By the why as a christian ‘youre not suppose to judge’(so critically)so harshly.Come on, their really great people.Have a good one.Bradangshimadzpax always!
yaya
Apr 1, 2007 at 4:35 pm
Hooray to everybody who loves BAMPZS!!!!!
Lucy
Apr 1, 2007 at 6:44 pm
Thank you Sherry for the vent. I just came from the grocery store myself and flip through the whlole article. They also have a picture inside of James and Angie’s kiss. Not too long ago, I saw an iterview of James Haven about that kiss. He said, that year, Angie was leaving the next day to film in Mexico. So when she won the award, James gave her a kiss, it was not a long one but the photographers took the picture and it was blasted all over the media calling it an “incest.” A psychologist said in “Showbiz Tonight” Angie’s transformation from her wild years is typical of a person who did not find her purpose in life yet. When he found Maddox, then Brad and Zahara, then Shiloh and Pax she is now a different person. All her energy is focussed on refugees, family and helping others through her work with the U.N. She found the right guy, she alo found her purpose in life. Both Brad and Angie are devoted to their kids and to each other. These tabloids are too desperate and want to destroy this family anyway they can. Thank you all for your insightful comments.
cynthia
Apr 1, 2007 at 9:49 pm
When she said that she felt more for adopted kids she didn’t mean she loved Shiloh less. We have also 2 adopted sons and true, I have this special feeling with these boys…love and compassion, because they were underpriveledged,unwanted and so unprotected just like other orphans. Like her, I have to work, too. I have 3 biological kids and that would make them 5 siblings! We have to feed them and give them security. Right? Those haters out there! STOP whinning about BAMPZS!!!!! This family is not perfect but I really luv them. I don’t care what you think. If you don’t have anything nice to say, be quiet, please. And by the way, I really really luv Pittwatch. I enjoy reading your comments. Hooray!
HOTTEST COUPLE EVER
Apr 2, 2007 at 2:48 am
#59 yaya Says: ITA
#60 cynthia Says: You are special like Brad and Angie. God Bless you and your family.
Della Thomas
Apr 2, 2007 at 5:13 am
Angelina,you can adopt fifty children if you want to.
Della Thomas
Apr 2, 2007 at 5:25 am
Beauty is only skin deep. God searches the heart
cynthia
Apr 2, 2007 at 6:08 am
Thanks #61 HOTTEST COUPLE EVER and to all the wonderful lovely guys of this site. More power!!!
Jamie
Apr 2, 2007 at 8:44 am
To Pat: Morality is made by society, and we people are not always right. Morals also change by time and different cultures define their morals differently. Years ago, a divorced woman was more persecuted than today. However, a divorced man has always faced with less social criticism.
What should Angelina forgive her father for? We don’t know what exactly has happened, so you who talk about morality should know that you shouln’t judge for things that you don’t know. What we read and see in the media is always an interpretation. Some interpretations are close to the reality, but tabloids don’t interprete, they speculate. Their speculations are far away from any reality or truth. I personally think Voight is not a good father, but a quite manipulative person. I have my explanation, it would go beyond the framework of a comment.
To YaYA, I think we should let people have their opinion, even we might not agree with them. When we start to bark at them, we just make them more aggressive and foster stubborness. This would never open any discussion, and noone will listen to each other. Personally, I prefer to bring in good arguments and be respectful to each other.
ike
Apr 2, 2007 at 1:43 pm
he said the following as well, which puts it into better context. Since she is NOT filming right now!
**”I’m not making any movies right now,”** Jolie said in the interview. “I will stay at home to help Pax adjust to his new life…”etc.
People mag were the first I think, to edit the quote to just the part US is now throwing back at her with glee!
___________________
I agree, it annoyed me that People left out her entire quote. She said she wasnt working RIGHT NOW, and would stay at home and help Pax adjust. Not that she would be a stay at home mom. This movie wasnt something that just came up after the adoption.. she knew about it and knew that Brad would be finished with his film before she had to go back to work. They both have said that they take turns working. Is there anything wrong in a dad taking care of the kids? Brad needs to do some more bonding as well..(im sure he is doing as much as he can while working)
BTW, I will never buy US Mag again.
lulu
Apr 2, 2007 at 1:48 pm
Oh please.. enough with the judging. And Angie HAS FORGIVEN HER FATHER. she has said so many times.. she also says she cant have him in her life because it is too painful. The man has serious issues and seems to have caused a lot of grief in her life as well as her mother and brother’s. It is sad but.. sometimes it has to be that way. He rarely was there for his kids.. maybe a few times a year if that. Not a real dad. And angie tried hard to change things.. by offering him a role in one of her films… right after that he sent her a cruel letter berating her.
Nope Voight is toxic. Angie is right to keep her kids away from him.
yaya
Apr 2, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Thanx HOTTEST COUPLE EVER!!!!!!! U guys just made my day.
shirtuck
Apr 3, 2007 at 1:27 am
Umm, some of you jump to conclusions. I don’t HATE A&B. I am just capable of seeing through the PR smoke screen they have created to take the spotlight off the adultery. Considering the MILLIONS they make, what they give to charities is a minor tax deduction. And I will repeat myself - I don’t HATE A&B.
BlessBrangelina
Apr 3, 2007 at 12:24 pm
#Really Shirtuck?# 65
Then why do you assume their guilt in something that you know nothing about. A situation that all 3 concerned swear never happened. But you & US weekly knows better, because you were the FLIES on the wall, I guess!
Going on holiday with someone when you are legally separated from a spouse does not make you an adulterer. You are a free agent, because you and your spouse have decided to call it quits, and filed papers to that effect!
Being pregnant together 1month after Judge signed off on divorce? That does not make you an adulterer either. Just makes you very HAPPY, to finally be moving on with your life and not babysitting your spouse’s career whilst your life “waves” at you as it flies by!
shirtuck
Apr 3, 2007 at 4:55 pm
BlessBrangelina 71
You were there? If I apply your theory-of-fact, YOU were a fly on the wall! Or you’re doing a bit of assuming yourself. I love the fanatical psych. WE LOVE YOU BRAD AND ANGELINA!!
BlessBrangelina
Apr 3, 2007 at 6:16 pm
#Shirtuck 72:
I never claimed to be there. I go by what the *parties* involved have each said regarding this issue. I am more inclined to believe what they say than what US weekly and their ilk report.
Unlike you who is absolutely certain that adultery took place. The only people who have suggested this “wrongdoing” are the above mentioned. So I am left to assume from your firm believe that you were either there with these publications to bare witness, or you have absolute faith in all that you have been fed.
And you are also calling “America’s sweetheart” a liar! And we all know she above such things.
BlessBrangelina
Apr 3, 2007 at 6:18 pm
PS: thanks for the label. If looking @ facts independently and thinking for myself means am a fanatic….then so be it.
I will be proud to be called a fanatic.
Lucy
Apr 4, 2007 at 11:31 am
I really enjoy reading all your comments and this is why I love this site. No rudeness, unlike the other sites I have seen. However, I do not admire the fact that the media is focussing on Brad and Angie’s personal lives so that we lose track of their work. They are just like us, if you strip their celebrity status, you will notice that you have a cousin who is not speaking with her Dad, a guy who fell in love with a co-worker and decided to leave his wife, a family who is raising adopted kids of all races and who also have the capability of having biological kids, a family who loves to travel, a woman who is talented and beautiful with a wild past, a man from the midwest who was raised in a traditional setting, etc. All these scenarios can be anybody’s life except for the fact that their names are not Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. We do not question their morality issue, their role as a mother or father or husband or wife. Actually it is none of our business. But since we are truly fans, we love to celebrate their successes even if it is not concerning their movies. So they give to charities for tax deduction. If I am wealthy, I will do the same. Others help the environment, which is also a tax deduction. Brad and Angie help orphans which is another form of charity. I give to my church and they give me an annual account of our contribution for tax purposes. It is life to whatever purpose you want to undertake.
lisa
Apr 4, 2007 at 12:26 pm
How true !!!! You are the best US !! We love you !!!! The truth hurts (Ouch)*
cynthia
Apr 4, 2007 at 9:21 pm
AMEN!!! #75 Lucy.
HOTTEST COUPLE EVER
Apr 4, 2007 at 10:40 pm
#75 Lucy
Very well said!
yaya
Apr 5, 2007 at 5:24 pm
you couldn’t have said it better #75 Lucy
FrankTalk
Jun 6, 2007 at 6:01 am
Thank God for this site, i can’t believe am justing noting it now, and i have been wasting my time and getting myself so pissed of with all those cabbage they write about Angelina on Eonline, getting myself so worked on and so annoyed each day. Now i won’t even bother there again except for information purposes. Thanks
Neleh
Jul 25, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Good day. Nelah here. ITA tabs are just that tabs. I have no respect towards them. Hey WOW. Im on a break. I think the other place was speaking about JJB. I love Angie/Brad+6. Nelah.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: